DCLugi Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 First, remove the religion and politics. From here I see it as individual businesses deciding who they want to sell to. If I could afford to I would open a gay only one stop shop and compete it the market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AynRand Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 I believe the goal is to make the highest overall profit, so do you believe that you will attract more business then you will lose by opening a gay only shop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fractional slacker Posted March 28, 2015 Share Posted March 28, 2015 Religion vs the state. Gee, I wonder which one will win.I live in Oregon where not baking a cake is crime punishable by taking all your stuff, because egalitarianism/altruism. Indiana has passed a law saying not baking a cake is okay. For that the lefties are losing their minds.How about a law that makes not dating someone a crime of sexual assault. Sounds reasonable /sarc. As to the OP, removing religion and politics you have freedom of association. Open a gay unicorn bar for all I care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anuojat Posted March 29, 2015 Share Posted March 29, 2015 Religion vs the state. Gee, I wonder which one will win. I live in Oregon where not baking a cake is crime punishable by taking all your stuff, because egalitarianism/altruism. Indiana has passed a law saying not baking a cake is okay. For that the lefties are losing their minds. How about a law that makes not dating someone a crime of sexual assault. Sounds reasonable /sarc. As to the OP, removing religion and politics you have freedom of association. Open a gay unicorn bar for all I care. The comments on some of the new sfrom Oregon strike me as insane. Wait, oh thats right they are insane. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tasmlab Posted March 31, 2015 Share Posted March 31, 2015 Instead of the law saying religious preferences are somehow special, I would've preferred if they used a free association argument, allowing for discrimination for any preference or criteria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
labmath2 Posted April 1, 2015 Share Posted April 1, 2015 I never understood why conservatives choose to represent their ideas the way they do. Instead of making the case for free association, they instead say religious freedom. Its obvious atheist statists will loose their minds over religious freedom. I imagine no one will oppose free association. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts