GYre0ePJhZ Posted June 29, 2015 Share Posted June 29, 2015 Recommended. Link: http://hwcdn.libsyn.com/p/a/9/4/a94c4ad5149b279e/cswdcc93.mp3?c_id=9292118&expiration=1435585133&hwt=acd246c85934bd7f591315474fbf5b2d Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheRobin Posted June 29, 2015 Share Posted June 29, 2015 Can't find the podcast, link just goes to the general page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GYre0ePJhZ Posted June 29, 2015 Author Share Posted June 29, 2015 Sorry! Fixed it now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WasatchMan Posted June 29, 2015 Share Posted June 29, 2015 I listened to this yesterday. Even though they are both hopeless statists, I thought it was a pretty interesting conversation. One thing that kept striking me is that Dan is such a pragmatist that he always wanted to take everything that Sam was saying and immediately frame it around political implementation. I think a lot of the time Sam was just trying to put forward the ethical case for claiming that certain behavior is objectively better than other behavior. However, Sam does seem to have this philosopher king mentality, where some pure agency with only noble intentions is going to able to justly police the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GYre0ePJhZ Posted June 29, 2015 Author Share Posted June 29, 2015 I am a fan of both. Each of them have their strengths I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts