Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Technically "agnostic" applies to your position on god's existence.

 

People have just taken the concept and applied it to other positions on other topics (i.e. I am agnostic about "x").  This seems to be to be a pretty legitimate form of language evolution in that the utility of one concept has been broadened so it's scope provides utility in a more universal form.

Posted

In an article on Skeptic Magazine by Shawn Dawson the term agnosticism is attributed to T. H. Huxley:

 

"Agnosticism is not a creed but a method, the essence of which lies in the vigorous application of a single principle. Positively, the principle may be expressed as in matters of intellect, follow your reason as far as it can take you without other considerations. And negatively, in matters of the intellect, do not pretend that matters are certain that are not demonstrated or demonstrable. It is wrong for a man to say he is certain of the objective truth of a proposition unless he can produce evidence which logically justifies that certainty"

-- "Agnosticism", 1889

For the purpose of his article he calls this "method" wide agnosticism which is no different than being a skeptic.

When he applies agnosticism to the question of god's existence he calls is narrow agnosticism

To answer your questions one can be agnostic about many things including the question of the existence of a god.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.