fractional slacker Posted September 9, 2015 Posted September 9, 2015 The good thing is feminists are generally easy to pick out in a crowd, and thus easy to avoid. The bad thing is they are hard to miss with their boorish attire and gaudy hair coloring or shaved head. bleh.https://www.swedishweekly.com/feminist-goes-crazy-when-compared-to-swedish-nationalist/
hannahbanana Posted September 9, 2015 Posted September 9, 2015 So let me get this straight....showing a side-by-side picture of two women is hate, but saying you want to "rape all softcore feminists with a Morningstar" or "I most definitely hate men" is just fine? Wow, I guess I messed up somewhere...
Donnadogsoth Posted September 9, 2015 Posted September 9, 2015 The thing to realise, when feminists present and behave like that, is that they aren't being ironic. They may look like they're being ironic, in an "Oh-aren't-I-so-bad-I-look-sound-and-smell-like-a-witch" sort of way, but they're wa-a-ay too into the role to the point that they can't be getting any humour value or other value out of merely "being ironic." Which means they are serious. These women are the wicked witches of our time, fairy story villains come to life. Many of them probably fancy themselves Wiccans but their membership in that club isn't essential, but not surprising. Their threats and "ironic" desires (which I won't repeat here) are representative of true qualities of sentiment, that manifests in the political sphere as institutional and cultural misandry. Thank God for real women, a good reason to go nationalist (which, I'll add, one can do without being a statist).
shirgall Posted September 9, 2015 Posted September 9, 2015 Relevant: http://everythingsaproblem.tumblr.com/post/128719482061/smiling (Apparently photoshopping a smile on a woman is problematic)
Frosty Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 The bad thing is they are hard to miss with their boorish attire and gaudy hair coloring or shaved head. bleh. Picture related. 2
fractional slacker Posted September 10, 2015 Author Posted September 10, 2015 Frosty - Great comparison. Nature has a way of warning about danger.
Donnadogsoth Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 Picture related. In other words, none of the animals shown above are good to eat.
AccuTron Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 In other words, none of the animals shown above are good to eat. Does "invasive species" relate here?
NotDarkYet Posted September 10, 2015 Posted September 10, 2015 Brilliant comparison. Nature's way of saying "POISON". Interestingly, in my life, the more dyed a girl has dyed her hair, the more militantly feminist (and illogical) she is. I can't think of a single female with violently dyed hair that is a SAFE person to have in your life.
Frosty Posted September 12, 2015 Posted September 12, 2015 Exactly, it's only a rule of thumb but I do think it does generally act as an outward indicator of inward issues, I'd also go as far as to say that about tattooed people and more specifically heavily tattooed people, the science behind that does correlate deviant behaviour with increased number of tattoos. Anecdotally the only people i know in RL who are heavily tattooed have had really trouble childhoods and struggle with other issues, although the reverse isn't necessarily true. All the personalities pictured above are quite abrasive as well, if you happen to know who they are you'll no doubt understand.
Recommended Posts