Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have to get off of CIAbook, Orwellian land but I have accumulated so many arguments and memes.

 

Speaking of disturbing behavior, why are there articles talking about pedofiles as anything but Monsters. Here is an article about "Meet the pedophiles that mean well" http://www.salon.com/.../01/meet_pedophiles_who_mean_well/

 

However on this issue of guns, when you look into the research gun control is actually used right before a genocide in so many cases as you can see from the attached graph from I believe the genocide museum in Hawaii. Also all the mass shooters have been on SSRI drugs, and instead of the pharmaceutical companies getting into trouble people are blaming guns. I'm sorry but liberal democrats are wrong on this issue and I think they are covering for all the pharmaceutical companies

gen-chart-550.jpg

11826021_1525605997730575_6598542836076207283_n.jpg

12042630_10153534089621047_538308275939478079_n.jpg

rent-too-high.jpg

440ashlge.jpg

20814_856517961070484_7359955523509239117_n.png

How-to-Propagate-Basil-2.jpg

democracy.jpg

10665361_10152725130249500_8423296687765357623_n.jpg

collectivism.jpg

images (2).jpg

Miley_Cyrus_Fukushima_Meme.jpg

Posted

Speaking of disturbing behavior, why are there articles talking about pedofiles as anything but Monsters.

 

Pedophilia is a preference, not a behavior. Did you mean to say molester? Also, when you demonize a human being, you shut down the ability to discuss the problem. If children weren't traumatized, they wouldn't grow up to molest children, so making the case for peaceful parenting will help to address the problem. Saying monster just incites hatred and suggests extermination is the only solution.

 

I'm sorry but liberal democrats are wrong on this issue and I think they are covering for all the pharmaceutical companies

 

By fingering the pharmaceutical companies, you're covering for the State. I, as an individual, do not have the "power" or "authority" to shove drugs down a child's throat. If I owned my own pharmaceutical company, I would not have the power or authority to shove drugs down a child's throat. If however I worked for the State as a government school teacher or counselor, I would have the "power" and "authority" to precipitate a series of events that would lead to drugs being shoved down a kid's throat. If I worked for the State as a "lawmaker," I could spit out words and magically give other human beings the power and authority to shove drugs down a child's throat.

 

If you address the symptom and not the cause, you are of no threat to the cancer. Those who operate in the name of the State are thankful to you for using your time and energy to try and draw people's attention to pharmaceutical companies instead of their false claim that people can exist in different, opposing moral categories.

Posted

Speaking of disturbing behavior, why are there articles talking about pedofiles as anything but Monsters. Here is an article about "Meet the pedophiles that mean well" http://www.salon.com/.../01/meet_pedophiles_who_mean_well/

 

Recently, a prominent radical feminist/transwoman/social justice warrior was ousted as a pedophile. The leftist media, and the SJW clique, instead of condemning her decided to double down and support her because narrative. They couldn't deny the evidence, so they are now saying there is nothing wrong with it. This is an article that explains it: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/21/heres-why-the-progressive-left-keeps-sticking-up-for-pedophiles/

Posted

 

Did you just gloss over the fact that this took place amid extreme, so-called "gun control"?

 

People who support gun control use that terminology to conceal the fact that they support forcibly controlling PEOPLE, not guns. And not people in general; Just the ones that don't exist in the magical moral category known as "authority" (politicians, soldiers, police).

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.