Jump to content

Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever's speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st July 2015


Donnadogsoth

Recommended Posts

I think I just invented a method to differentiate fact from fiction that supersedes the scientific method. It's less time consuming, instant, and never fails:

 

Does a politician endorse the theory?

If yes then the theory is incorrect.

Minor addendum: "...the theory is most likely incorrect."  (Broken clocks?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the video, check out this from NASA.

 

NASA study reports increasing ice gains in Antarctic.

 

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-10-mass-gains-antarctic-ice-sheet.html#jCp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the video, check out this from NASA.

 

NASA study reports increasing ice gains in Antarctic.

 

A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers.

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-10-mass-gains-antarctic-ice-sheet.html#jCp

 

A book I've read, The Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism by Steve Goreham talked about this, but it's good to have an update; thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I explain that the scientific method has only two results: So far so good, and oops! If anyone responds with adjectives to the word science along the lines of faith, consensus, hope, trust, or any other feel-good, touchy-feely response I know it is Scientism. And the rise in responses of the latter scare me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.