Jump to content

God is not Great? The State is not Great!


MacD

Recommended Posts

I recently watched "Why I Was Wrong About Atheism" and "Why I Was Right About Atheism". I started thinking about Stefan's concept of atheism as being the worship of the state. This lead me to reread and rewatch arguments of the late Christopher Hitchens, whose works and debates were as influential to me in becoming an atheist as Stefan's were to me becoming an anarchist. It has been a few years since I visited Hitchens' works, but I still find value in his anti-theist arguments. However, I have drifted far away from his political philosophy, which I can best describe as "anti-totalitarian"-yet-still-statist-leftism. It is strange to think how a man who put so much value into reason and rationality could not turn his skepticism towards the fundamentals of the state. After all, the state, not unlike god, is a concept of the mind with no basis in material reality.

 

I decided to preform a thought experiment by taking some of my favorite quotes and arguments from Hitchens to tweak the language to address not the claims of religion, but those of the state. I expressed this idea on a comment to Stefan's latter video, and I've decided to expand on it. From Hitch-22, “I try to deny myself any illusions or delusions, and I think that this perhaps entitles me to try and deny the same to others, at least as long as they refuse to keep their fantasies to themselves.” Perhaps this way I can honor his memory by using his own logic to dispel the illusions and delusions of the state. Hitchens' arguments against religion are strong; I can't help but to wonder how he would respond if he was posed these same arguments about the state:

 

Hitchens' Quote:

Name me an ethical statement made or an action performed by a believer that could not have been made or performed by a non-believer.

Could you name a wicked action or a vile statement made by someone, attributable only to their religious faith?

 

Modified Quote:

Name me an ethical statement made or an action performed through the state that could not have been made or performed voluntarily.

Could you name a wicked action or a vile statement made by someone, attributable only to their belief in the state?

 

 

 

Hitch:

Not imposed? Did you really say not imposed? What if you reject this offer, what are you told? What have you been told by centuries of Christians if you reject this offer that took place by means of a torture to death of a human being that you didn't want and should have prevented if you could? What if you reject the offer? And if you accept it you have eternal life and your sins are forgiven. Oh, great. What a horrible way to abolish your own responsibility and get your own bliss. I don't want it. Oh, you don't? Well then you can go to hell. This is not imposed? This hasn't been preached to children by gruesome elderly virgins backed by force for centuries? This hasn't poisoned whole societies? No, of course it's imposed, it's not voluntary.

 

Modified:

Not imposed? Did you really say not imposed? What if you reject this offer, what are you told? What have you been told by centuries of patriots if you reject this offer that took place by means of war and death of thousands of human beings that you didn't want and should have prevented if you could? What if you reject the offer? And if you accept it you have safety and security. Oh, great. What a horrible way to abolish your own responsibility and get your own bliss. I don't want it. Oh, you don't? Well then you can go to jail. This is not imposed? This hasn't been preached to children by teachers and politicians backed by force for centuries? This hasn't poisoned whole societies? No, of course it's imposed, it's not voluntary.

 

 

 

Hitch:

That's fine but you must leave me out of it [your religious observance], I don't want to be told that I have to obey these laws too, or that my children have to be taught this in school, or that laws have to be written to ratify the bizarre beliefs of a cult like yours.

That's what I need you to understand. You're quite happy to believe this, why can't you keep it to yourself?

(Why can't you keep your atheism to yourself?)

Because the religious won't just allow me to, because every time I open the paper there's another instance of theocratic encroachment on free society, which I won't put up with. Up with which, I will not put...

 

Modified:

That's fine but you must leave me out of it [your ideological observance], I don't want to be told that I have to obey these laws too, or that my children have to be taught this in school, or that laws have to be written to ratify the bizarre beliefs of a government like yours.

That's what I need you to understand. You're quite happy to believe this, why can't you keep it to yourself?

(Why can't you keep your anarchism to yourself?)

Because the state won't just allow me to, because every time I open the paper there's another instance of statist encroachment on free society, which I won't put up with. Up with which, I will not put...

 

 

 

Hitch:

What has this [the consequences of religious charity] got to do with the existence of god or the validity of religious claims?

 

Modified:

What has this [the consequences of welfare] got to do with the existence of the state or the validity of statist claims?

 

 

 

Hitch:

The gods that we've made are exactly the gods you'd expect to be made by a species that's about half a chromosome away from being chimpanzee.

 

Modified:

The governments that we've founded are exactly the governments you'd expect to be made by a species that's about half a chromosome away from being chimpanzee.

 

 

 

Hitch:

Morality comes from us; religion claims to have invented it on our behalf.

 

Modified:

Morality comes from us; the state claims to have invented it on our behalf.

 

 

 

Hitch:

“If god is dead, isn’t everything permissible?” … this seems to me is a very profound insult to us in our very deepest nature and character. It is not the case, I submit to you, that we do not set about butchering and raping and thieving right now only because we’re afraid of a divine punishment or because we are looking for a divine reward.

 

Modified:

“If there is no government, isn’t everything permissible?” … this seems to me is a very profound insult to us in our very deepest nature and character. It is not the case, I submit to you, that we do not set about butchering and raping and thieving right now only because we’re afraid of a legal punishment or because we are looking for a legal reward.

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is also instructive is Hitchens lifelong journey away from socialism. He never gave it up, but he sure got more skeptical as he got older.


As far as "Morality comes from us; the state claims to have invented it on our behalf." I would try it instead as "Morality comes from us; but the state claims it must manage it on our behalf." Not an exact transcription, but more apt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.