Territory lost by encroaching migrant populated no-go zones

[Germ-a-knee]

Dear ladies and gentlemen,

 

there is a question that recently popped up in my mind in regards to state territory currently lost to migrants claiming territory as 'theirs', as is happening in european countries like Sweden. I have not been able to gather any information regarding that issue, but I think that if we take the process taking place as is and try to get our hands on reliable data, it should come to many as a shocker to see that in fact, no-go zones which even the police don't enter anymore, are in fact state territory that has been literally taken over by invading forces.

 

If anyone else finds this question interesting, or if Stefan and team think that this might make a good subject for a little 'truth' video, something interesting might come out of it. I think that people need to see some concrete numbers about how much territory has been lost to countries like Sweden, to wake up more and more to this most certainly existential (ha, I said it) threat.

 

I apologize for possible grammar errors or weird wording, since English is not my native language.

 

 

Best regards

Germ-a-knee

[Donnadogsoth]

Don't ancaps find this a difficult issue to address, given that according to them all "state territory" is illegitimately owned and thus subject to appropriation by whatever groups decide to claim ownership, police, and maintain their own borders?

[Mister Mister]

Don't ancaps find this a difficult issue to address, given that according to them all "state territory" is illegitimately owned and thus subject to appropriation by whatever groups decide to claim ownership, police, and maintain their own borders?

 

Yes and no.  A society like Sweden which is relatively peaceful and recognizes the rule of law is much closer to what we want than a Muslim society which observes a brutal law based on ancient scriptures, is oppressive to women and children, and where people throw rocks at you for being different.

[Donnadogsoth]

You would also agree that Sweden has a closer proximity to ancapism, just by virtue of being sweet and nice and all that?

[RichardY]

Problem with Sweden is I don't think most people there recognise a just form of law or any law when it comes down to it, both native Swedes( "Majority rule") and Islamic migrants. (Sharia Law).

 

A result of the unjust state of affairs is obviously the wealth transfer from native swedes to Migrants, as well as Sweden making No 1 in Rape Crimes (I wonder how many people know this?, seems Evil how this is not more widely addressed). Why would anyone move to Sweden? Ok they have some very Intelligent people, who have built up productive industry, I guess you would have to be, to survive in a cold and in some areas Sub-Arctic climate. Why not move to Portugal instead? The climate is much warmer with a better growing season, plus there are abandoned houses already there to occupy. If the migrants are going to live on welfare in Sweden what else are they going to do but, screw themselves and everyone else.

 

I'm not sure if Nationalism (for the Natives) is going to be able to fix the declining real economy and national debt, plus avert bloody civil war. The problem would be how they would get into and hold onto power and whether they would really be Nationalist at all. If the National Party is Socialist they're just going to wreck the economy anyway and get removed one way or another. Maybe the Military will takeover as has happened in countries like Greece, Portugal and Spain. Plus a lot of the things holding Nationalism together are mostly dead, Christianity and in-group preferences.

 

IMO there should be things like Freedomain Radio to at least spread critical thinking to those who are able. I'm not saying that Nationalists are bad, in fact the BNP in the UK did investigations into both the MP expenses scandal and Rochdale grooming, I just think they get cut to pieces when they focus on getting elected or stage protests and Nationalism has so many differences in economic and cultural approaches. Smaller, but many resistance cells (occasionally working together), broadcasting the Truth are going to be way harder to infiltrate and corrupt. Many Northern Europeans are all fairly similar anyway why can't we all work together? Southern Europeans are fine too, though they always seem to go on strike, I'm not sure if they would be able to implement a better network of justice for a while.

 

The younger generation will decide the future. Most, but not all of the Baby Boomer Generation seem just too fat and cynical, plus they don't have a clue what to do. (a bit like me, not so much the cynic any more) Kind of feel in the dark really.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[rosencrantz]

You would also agree that Sweden has a closer proximity to ancapism, just by virtue of being sweet and nice and all that?

 

 

Sweden is closer to a freer society because it is a high IQ, high trust society.