Guest Gee Posted July 14, 2016 Posted July 14, 2016 Hi guys, so I was thinking about this 28 page report buisness. Would Hillary of read it as state secutary? Would I be right in thinking... The 28 pages show Saudi involvement (presumably) Hillary would of read them as state secutary Therefore Hillary would know of Saudi 9/11 involvement Hillary has taken ~$20 million from the Saudis Therefore Hillary took ~$20 million from the Saudis after knowing of Saudi involvement in 9/11 The implication being she condones the 9/11 attacks. Pretty sure that is going to have some big ramifications. Trump has already started the hashtag #giveBackTheMoney (or something similar) I think. *edit Here is a link to Congress To Release Classified "28 Pages" Detailing Saudi Involvement In 9/11 As Soon As Friday
A4E Posted July 14, 2016 Posted July 14, 2016 What is the line of reasoning that Saudis would help attack USA? I don't think I have read any information on this. Recent presidents have been friendly with the Saudis. I have also consumed information that says all recent presidents know how to speak and communicate in Arabic. (don't know if it is true) If there is a long history of this kind of relationship. Why would they help attack the USA? I have some presumptions of course, but I am asking because I have not seen any line of reasoning from anyone outside of my viewpoint.
Guest Gee Posted July 15, 2016 Posted July 15, 2016 No line of reasoning, it is assumed. I was just wondering if it was a reasonable assumption that the secutary of state would of read those papers.
Guest Gee Posted August 2, 2016 Posted August 2, 2016 Slowly, it begins. Pic related. Tom Woods did a good interview on the 28 pages for anyone interested in the topic.
Recommended Posts