NiemandKnows Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 Who is more qualified to be President? The answer is neither. The answer is no one is qualified to be President. Think about it. We want a President that is foreign policy expert, a diplomacy expert,an economics expert,a tax law expert,a domestic policy expert,a civil rights expert,a Constitutional expert,a science and technology expert,an expert of Space Exploration,and a military expert. This person does not exist. What we really need is a President that can hire the best experts to advise the President. On this basis alone,we should want Trump as President. Trump is not a construction worker, a carpenter,a plumber,or a hotel manager. He has proven he is an expert at finding the right people for the job. And he will not care what the party affiliation is of the people he hires to advise him. Hillary,on the other hand,will certainly not appoint anyone that does not have a "D" after their name. By limiting herself to just Democrats,she will be cutting the number of experts she can choose in half. If a expert happens to be anything other than Democrat,he certainly will not be working in a Clinton cabinet.
dsayers Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 Who is more qualified to be President? The answer is neither. The answer is no one is qualified to be President. Think about it. We want a President Whoops. And you had such a strong start! Nobody is qualified to rule over other humans. They'd have to be fundamentally different in a way that puts them in a different, opposing moral category. As you said, no such person exists.
JesseSchroeder Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 Qualifications for POTUSA: Age and Citizenship requirements - US Constitution, Article II, Section 1 No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States. Term limit amendment - US Constitution, Amendment XXII, Section 1 - ratified February 27, 1951 No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.
thebeardslastcall Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 So basically what you're saying Jesse... is that she is qualified simply by virtue of not having dropped dead yet.
Mister Mister Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 I don't know what "qualified" means besides the Constitutional qualifications Jesse referenced. Usually people use it to refer to political experience, as if that is some inherent virtue. It didn't used to be that being a career politician was looked at as any kind of admirable or honorable life.
Donnadogsoth Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 Who is more qualified to be President? The answer is neither. The answer is no one is qualified to be President. Think about it. We want a President that is foreign policy expert, a diplomacy expert,an economics expert,a tax law expert,a domestic policy expert,a civil rights expert,a Constitutional expert,a science and technology expert,an expert of Space Exploration,and a military expert. This person does not exist. What we really need is a President that can hire the best experts to advise the President. On this basis alone,we should want Trump as President. Trump is not a construction worker, a carpenter,a plumber,or a hotel manager. He has proven he is an expert at finding the right people for the job. And he will not care what the party affiliation is of the people he hires to advise him. Hillary,on the other hand,will certainly not appoint anyone that does not have a "D" after their name. By limiting herself to just Democrats,she will be cutting the number of experts she can choose in half. If a expert happens to be anything other than Democrat,he certainly will not be working in a Clinton cabinet. You've got it, NiemandKnows, the entity American are electing isn't just the President, it's the Presidency. The President leads them, but they have great influence on affairs. If he surrounds himself with good people, he becomes more than he could be without them.
RichardY Posted October 20, 2016 Posted October 20, 2016 A President rules over nobody, he presides. People serve a president and he/she serves them, he does not lead them, if he should "lead them" it is by example and cooperation. He oversees the relaying of information and gives his advice. The "American President" is not a President, he/she is a Dictator. Here's why, as Stefan has explained before and I'm paraphrasing "Almost the moment George Washington became "President" he rode down the Whiskey Rebellion Pennsylvania (making him a Military Dictator). Who is more qualified to be President? A President is Just or he is not a President, ergo he does not serve. Your not voting for a President, your making the case for who is the best "Bomb Disposal Expert". Though personally a small part of me would like to see Clinton get elected so "it" (Brain Fog) Blows up.
Iron Horse Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbWenUiJ4Ps Christopher Hitchens nailed it with Hillary Clinton on her experience. I do not know how long ago this was recorded but I would guess at least ten years.
David Miller Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 Does anyone seriously think Trump is going to win and not be immediately assassinated? Is he running against Hillary Clinton or is he running against the military industrial complex? If in fact he is running and not just working that reality TV angle towards the Trump News Network? Are we sure of the Pentagons intentions or capabilities? Those are the same people who planned Operation Northwoods (vetoed by Kennedy who was then killed). From just the right angle it appears as though the nefarious they may have been planning 9/11 since 1962. Plenty of time to set the charges. What happens when he contests the results and looses? Trump TV looks suddenly not so bad to Zoidberg maybe? Do people actually believe this will be some kind of bloodless coup? That the forces which have been at work since the end of WW2 are going to be swayed by hotelier and reality TV star? Does this entire sham appear engineered to anyone other than me? Or am I wearing a tinfoil hat? Did Vietnam not begin under false pretense? Operation Paperclip anybody? Were there in fact WMD's in Iraq? Is there a patent clerk or perhaps a specialist in the generation and manipulation of electromagnetic fields through screens who could give us some insight into US Patent#6506148? Why do people say conspiracy when fact is stated? More importantly and perhaps personally (because I am half retarded) how does anyone know whats real on the internet? Why participate in a farce that is so clearly a farce? Why not do everything in your power to bring it to it's inevitable end by whatever means available to you? And how is Trump going to accomplish this same essential purpose without FEMA camps? Obviously Hitlery is greasy with a capital G. Does that strike anyone as rather odd and rather bold that some podunk failure of an attorney from Arkansas has such an incredible amount of support from nearly every single corporate entity both domestic and international on the planet? And this is a contest for the keys to the biggest baddest hot rod war machine on the planet.... and I'm supposed to believe that this is all up for grabs through the magic of democracy? Cause of "muh constitution"? Is this not funny to anyone else? Am I being too cynical? I don't feel I am. The leader of my country said these words "If you kill your enemies, they win."
Izzy Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 My minimal qualifications for president: They do nothing in office. My ideal qualifications for president: They chip away government involvement in everything.
RichardY Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 Does anyone seriously think Trump is going to win and not be immediately assassinated? Is he running against Hillary Clinton or is he running against the military industrial complex? If he gets in Good with the Military Industrial Complex, as he's trying to do and accepts that he's a dictator, trying to establish perhaps a presidency again, maybe he has a chance and the World won't collapse into more chaos. The expenditure on the Military and all the related Special Interests, Banks and Arms Dealers. Can't see how with such huge payments (Something like 50% of $ spent on the Military Globally) he'd not have to tread carefully around them and have them on board to some degree. I doubt the CEO of Coca Cola or McDonalds would have him assassinated. If in fact he is running and not just working that reality TV angle towards the Trump News Network? I'd imagine there are less seemingly suicidal ways of doing so and why would he need to.
sweathog1 Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 I watched the 3 debates, there is no hope. NOT ONE OF THEM WOULD TALK ABOUT THE DEBT. What happened to the debt ceiling? This election is rigged is absolutely correct, Mr Trump. Beyond shameful. To be clear I do not want to single out the Americans. Canada will take in 500,000 refugees, yes that is not a misprint. Just last week on the CBC the immigration minister said the government was unprepared and surprised with the amount of children coming over,swamping the education system but still they will continue.
dsayers Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 My ideal qualifications for president: They chip away government involvement in everything. No entity intentionally chips away at their own survival.
RichardY Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 (edited) I watched the 3 debates, there is no hope. "Abandon Your Posts!!!, FLEE FLEE for (your) LIVES!!!!" 500,000 Refugees... I think there's 2 of the lower Middle provinces in Canada with about 100,000 people already living there (infested with biting insects from what I've heard), some former Ukrainians as well. Maybe they'll all be dumped/placed in Quebec, pretty expensive in Vancouver. The Senate expenses scandal there made the UK MP's look like saints. All things being equal, I'd probably prefer to live in Canada better pay and steak, than the UK. Edited October 22, 2016 by RichardY
sweathog1 Posted October 21, 2016 Posted October 21, 2016 "Abandon Your Posts!!!, FLEE FLEE for LIVES!!!!" 500,000 Refugees... I think there's 2 of the lower Middle provinces in Canada with about 100,000 people already living there (infested with biting insects from what I've heard), some former Ukrainians as well. Maybe they'll all be dumped/placed in Quebec, pretty expensive in Vancouver. The Senate expenses scandal there made the UK MP's look like saints. All things being equal, I'd probably prefer to live in Canada better pay and steak, than the UK. Well okay then lets be fair, given the the Brit population is roughly twice that of us, you guys should be letting in at least 1 million more this year, the Yanks are 10 times our size. Ya might want to read/watch Schoolyard Scandal... hopefully this link works seems they don't like external links. http://www.therebel.media/schoolyard_scandal?utm_campaign=schoolyard_scan&utm_medium=email&utm_source=therebel
RichardY Posted October 22, 2016 Posted October 22, 2016 Well okay then lets be fair, given the the Brit population is roughly twice that of us, you guys should be letting in at least 1 million more this year, the Yanks are 10 times our size. I know. Actually apologies didn't pay enough attention to your post. Britain's full to the brim and tiny compared to Canada, they should stay in the Middle East, less cost, similar cultures.
Izzy Posted October 23, 2016 Posted October 23, 2016 No entity intentionally chips away at their own survival. Perhaps that may be the case, but it's a good test to see if it's possible and Trump is the only candidate to run that has the potential to do it. If he gets elected and everything stays the same, we will know in the future that this path is not going to work.
thebeardslastcall Posted October 23, 2016 Posted October 23, 2016 Both candidates have declared each other unqualified. Probably more-so than any election ever before and yet they will both be on the ballot, so doesn't really mean much of anything except for a way to denigrate one's opponent with the voter base who decides (if that's not too generous a term to use for the action) on who will be president. If Trump wins we'll see the limits of what that type of person can do in office and if Clinton wins... we'll likely speed up our descent down the rabbit hole into even more harsh economic times and less liberty and also prove corruption doesn't mean much anymore. This election reveals the sad state of America right now. Lefties care more about affirmative-action candidates and false ceilings than electing a good or semi-legitimate candidate.
dsayers Posted October 24, 2016 Posted October 24, 2016 Perhaps that may be the case, but it's a good test to see if it's possible and Trump is the only candidate to run that has the potential to do it. If he gets elected and everything stays the same, we will know in the future that this path is not going to work. Do not try and speak for others. There are plenty of people that are able to put 2 and 2 together to get 4 without having to enslave their neighbors to satisfy their own I'm-not-free-in-my-own-head experiment.
sweathog1 Posted October 24, 2016 Posted October 24, 2016 I know. Actually apologies didn't pay enough attention to your post. Britain's full to the brim and tiny compared to Canada, they should stay in the Middle East, less cost, similar cultures. Hopefully some of you will take the time to read the below links puppet presidents/prime ministers or not. http://www.wnd.com/2016/10/u-n-goes-all-in-for-unlimited-migration/ and here it is for your convenience.... Habitat III https://www2.habitat3.org/bitcache/97ced11dcecef85d41f74043195e5472836f6291?vid=588897&disposition=inline&op=view
Recommended Posts