aviet Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 Trump winning virtually everything, from a 500k sample:http://www.isidewith.com/map/rxnM/2016-presidential-election-donald-trump-vs-hillary-clinton#z56.75 million sample:http://www.isidewith.com/poll/801555698/290416960Trump ahead with blacks and all income brackets, except $200k+/year. Socialists, SJWs, The Guardian now fused themselves with corporatism, globalism and Goldman Sachs. 3
deadflagblues Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 While the polls are almost definitely biased in favour of Hillary, don't you think that these are even less likely to be an accurate representation of voting trends? Hillary's voter base are primarily people who don't actually know what Trump's proposed policies are, and every single person who took this test now has at least a minor understanding of how closely they agree with Trump. Perhaps it's a good representation of how many people agree with Trump, but it's not a good representation of how many people think that they agree with Trump.
aviet Posted October 28, 2016 Author Posted October 28, 2016 While the polls are almost definitely biased in favour of Hillary, don't you think that these are even less likely to be an accurate representation of voting trends? Hillary's voter base are primarily people who don't actually know what Trump's proposed policies are, and every single person who took this test now has at least a minor understanding of how closely they agree with Trump. Perhaps it's a good representation of how many people agree with Trump, but it's not a good representation of how many people think that they agree with Trump. I have no idea. This site also has some interesting statistics on affirmative action, showing blacks are as opposed to it almost as much as whites and other ethnicities: http://www.isidewith.com/poll/3507504/290416960 I guess being called idiots in public is not that popular.
Nima Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 This one also has some interesting analyses: statespoll.com I think he adjusts polls to make turnout assumptions more empirical based on primary particiption.
Recommended Posts