Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

In a world where most trends are looking negative, choppy and fatalistic, I was wondering what positive trends may be at play. The thought dawned on me that those who believe there should be equality of outcome and if there isn't it is because of the 1%, racism, sexism, etc. (also known as Marxists) don't appear to have many children.

So I pulled up UK birth-rates by region and in general the working class areas have the highest birth rates, followed by conservative areas, then regressive areas. However, the most conservative areas tend to trump the working-class mean, with birth rates over 2.0.

Looking at the areas with the lowest birth-rates, you find Islington, which is known as the epicenter of of insane Marxism and virtue signaling in the UK - the seat of Jeremy Corbyn, collapsing leader of Labour. The fertility rate in Islington in just 1.29. At a glance it appears that all the bottom 25 areas are regressive areas that voted to stay in the EU.

The data shows that about hard-conservative areas have about 20% more children than hard-regressive areas. The trends is roughly identical in the United States.

My town is a mix of working-class and middle-class conservatives, which has meant the area has been successively conservative for almost two-hundred years, when political parties were formed, bar a two year blip. There is however a very annoying group of activist communitarians, most of whom have no children and those that do will almost certainly have no grand-children.

What are others' experiences of Marxists, social justice warriors and other manipulative grievance mongers and their family status? From what I have seen, these traits tend to run in the family and I think with the hard resource squeeze we are going into, I can't see them passing on their bird-brain ideas.

Posted

Do you mean to ask if the idea of Marxism will ever be fully rejected? Not in the foreseeable future. When the greatest philosophy show in the world in the information age pushes for the perpetuation of the State by engaging in political voting and turning to masters for solutions, Marxism isn't even threatened.

  • Downvote 1
Posted

While Marxism has being going strong since 1848, socialism goes back further to Thomas More's Utopia, and our betters looking out for our lessers was formalized by Plato. It will probably never go away, until empiricism trumps sensualism.

Posted

What's the answer?

 

Noone calls themselves populares this days. Yet they are ones. They believe in the same gief free shit to poor as populares did back in ancient Rome.

Did populares went extinct ? Well Yes and No.

Will marxist go extinct ... yes and no. At some point people will drop the term but not behavior. So it depends what you mean when you say marxists. There will always be -r selected people. But the word changes.

During cold war USA was in a "war" with communism/socialism so the -r selected lolipops could not call themselves openly marxist so they called themselves "democrats". Today in Central Europe in former communist countries Right winger are named Democratic parties. 

 

Its just a word, words die, but behaviors remains.

Posted

Do you mean to ask if the idea of Marxism will ever be fully rejected?

 

It was a general open thread about the spread of Marxism through the family.

 

I don't know where you would find data, but I think it's quite likely that Marxist-types have at best a 1.0 fertility rate. It's impossible for them to establish hegemony except via social disruption, revolution and dictatorship.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.