Mrdthree Posted November 21, 2016 Posted November 21, 2016 (edited) I just listened to Stefan explain what he believes Richard Spencer means by white nationalism. I then read what the New York Times said Richard Spencer said and did http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/us/alt-right-salutes-donald-trump.html?_r=0&referer=http://m.huffpost.com/usThere is a huge chasm between these two reports. Stefan should interview the man to verify his thought processes to resolve rather than popularize him by projecting his belief system onto Mr. Spencer Edited March 25, 2017 by Mrdthree 2 1
Guest Gee Posted November 22, 2016 Posted November 22, 2016 I just listened to Stefan explain what he believes Richard Spencer means by white nationalism. I then read what the New York Times said Richard Spencer said and did http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/us/alt-right-salutes-donald-trump.html?_r=0&referer=http://m.huffpost.com/us There is a huge chasm between these two reports. Stephan should interview the man to verify his thought processes to resolve rather than popularize him by projecting his belief system onto Mr. Spencer Can you help me out here? I just read the article and I don't understand the problem. Where exactly is the chasm?
Pelafina Posted November 22, 2016 Posted November 22, 2016 Mrdthree -- What video or podcast did you hear Stef talking about Richard Spencer?
Guest Gee Posted November 22, 2016 Posted November 22, 2016 Mrdthree -- What video or podcast did you hear Stef talking about Richard Spencer? It is the interview with McInnes. Spencerrrrrrrr! Don't do that interview, don't talk to the news... btw... The game here is to provoke the cucks to punch right. The left never punches left, but the right must punch right.....
rosencrantz Posted November 25, 2016 Posted November 25, 2016 Spencerrrrrrrr! Don't do that interview, don't talk to the news... Seventh Svenpai clairvoyant as usual
David Ottinger Posted November 26, 2016 Posted November 26, 2016 Is this about that time Richard raised his glass to toast victory after giving a speech, and people passionately raised their hands for the Q&A, but the fake news media dubbed them all literally Hitler?
virtue Posted December 1, 2016 Posted December 1, 2016 I've seen talks by Richard Spencer, and I doubt his view of white nationalism is that of white supremacy - as some in the media want to suggest. Even if he is a white supremacist he is, in my opinion, smart enough to cover his tracks if he wanted to, and so an interview isn't going to expose him. Of course, an interview is a good idea, not as means to expose him as something I believe he's not, but for the intellectual value. +1 for an interview
WilliamH Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 There could be some branding issues with this! I've heard him on another podcast and he's very articulate and his ideas as far as I know are basically white ethnocentrism. Now, how would he bring about this? I have no idea! I'm guessing it would involve policies that would make it economically unfeasible for non-white to live in certain areas of the US or the entire US. (but that's already the case basically with the self segregation we see among the population which is includes whites/blacks/latinos/asians etc )
Will Torbald Posted January 25, 2017 Posted January 25, 2017 There could be some branding issues with this! I've heard him on another podcast and he's very articulate and his ideas as far as I know are basically white ethnocentrism. Now, how would he bring about this? I have no idea! I'm guessing it would involve policies that would make it economically unfeasible for non-white to live in certain areas of the US or the entire US. (but that's already the case basically with the self segregation we see among the population which is includes whites/blacks/latinos/asians etc ) He doesn't want segregation as much as what he calls "peaceful ethnic cleansing" where each of the races would leave to their area of origin through incentives and relocation programs. In the end it wouldn't be an ethnically pure society, but one that is explicitly for European peoples, not a multicultural melting pot. Any remaining groups would have to accept those terms, I assume, like Israel does where it's not 100% Jewish, but it's 100% for Jews.
Recommended Posts