Donnadogsoth Posted December 19, 2016 Posted December 19, 2016 A good case can be made that power is masculine in nature. The male mind, the male body as a symbolic echo of that mind, the male gang as an expression of the possibilities of mind and body, comprise the locus of power throughout all of known historical time and space. This power is not unified. Men can fight other men. But the best way to fight a man is to get him to fight himself, through the application of the spellcraft known as words. Control what a man believes, and you control how he behaves. Historically this power of spellcraft is found in three sources: religion, state, and women. Religion and state usually go together, as seen in ancient priest-ridden Ægypt, caste-bound India, witchdoctored Africa, imperial and later communist China, and communist Russia. Compared to these societies the religion-states of the West, even Mediæval Europe at its height, are shamefully un-totalitarian. The closest things Europe has historically to that impulse are imperial Rome and its imitators such as Napoleonic France and Hitlerian Germany—though now it is moving increasingly towards totalitarianism of a deeply insalubrious nature. Women are a prize to normal, healthy men. The female face is the most meaningful thing in the world to such a man—what it betokens by way of romantic emotions, of sex, of childbearing, of honour and dignity and decency and purpose—everything worth fighting for is in that face. It is a visual word. It is magic. And the guileful woman can get her man to work, to fight, to be killed using that “word”. It makes sense, then, that the religion-state would use women to control men. It does this by exploiting women as the natural hard-core of religionists who exert magical influence over their homes, to the point where men become infected by this religiosity both by their mothers and wives and by the (always mostly or wholly male) clergy. Men find their place in the world reinforced by the religion of their women, even if that religion makes those men the masters of those women, even vicious and mean masters. “Happy wife, happy life” is a popular credo in the West for a reason, and betrays the truth of feminine influence. Unhappy women can make life miserable for men and therefore get their way. So the power of powerful men, through religion-state-women, deploys spellcraft against the ordinary man. Relevantly to today, we see the administration of a potion of universal solvent, called the Alcahest, to men. This potion is made very sweet to taste by the modern consumer economy and the sexual revolution, but within it is a brew of identity politics guilt, anti-principles thought-scrambling, and social, economic, and political shocks. It is refined and distributed by our mass media and our schools, which are basically covens at this point. Concocted and poured, this alchahest controls the minds of its partakers, bewitching them into voting for politicians who work to dissolve borders to capital and people, thereby dissolving the white race, the Western languages, Western culture high and low, and, in true baby-with-the-bathwater style, the hated Christianity itself. Thus power is transferred from ordinary men to the age-old, parasitic oligarchy that is benefitting and generally overseeing the dastardly operation. The traitors and usurpers have concentrated all their magical firepower against ordinary men in order to entrap them in a spiritual Alcatraz and so prevent them from acting to save their race, language, culture, religion, and territorial integrity. If that happens, we face a technocratic New Dark Age of which the present premonitions will seem gaily benign.
Recommended Posts