Magnetic Synthesizer Posted February 5, 2017 Share Posted February 5, 2017 Best scenario is 1+ freedom foundation(s) survives and we're good. All the leftarchists can self-remove themselves through communist starvation. Top snek. What do you think? I think we should focus on the survival of freedom, not on the survival of our enemies. The commies in Venezuela can die. Any of our allies should have left before it went to shit. My way for liberty has two parts: -Outpopulate commies through superior reproductive economics and migration (to avoid their suicide rituals). -Prevent establishment of a planetary super-state. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RotYeti Posted March 4, 2017 Share Posted March 4, 2017 I think you should expand upon this. Give us a bit more to talk about. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnetic Synthesizer Posted March 7, 2017 Author Share Posted March 7, 2017 I think you should expand upon this. Give us a bit more to talk about. I think there is plenty to discuss already. I created a new post on the general board entitled approximately, treating individuals based on who they are (regardless of responsibility for their initial person and environment). Basically if someone is born stupid, they are treated stupid and no we don't take care of them just because ''it's not your fault, it's not fair!'' It's not their fault they were born that way. I mean you could and there are some appreciable values at play in your behavior of doing so. I can see myself doing it for strangers after we live in ancap 'utopia' and the poorest person has an orbital habitat and 4 naval battle-cruisers on Earth's ocean. I will now also created a novel post explaining a new meta-perspective on the interplay between environment and genetics. We should keep all the resources to ourselves and to the allies of our values and ideals. We should not sacrifice ourselves for enemies. It is also preferable to help our allies instead of neutrals. (Careful how you read that because, for example, if helping neutrals (or enemies) helps your values and ideals (which are shared by your allies) then it's good. For example, if you turn an enemy into an ally by giving him resources (such as your time), then it's good. You better hope it's as environmental as possible and that any genetic determinism is nulled (but remains as a dormant vulnerability/susceptibility to the bad behavior if the social changes) by existing conditions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts