libido dominandi and ruling class non-ideological pragmatism

[IamSpartacus]

I have thought about this a bit and it occurs to me that the true rulers of this world are not idealists in the sense of having the same passions that afflict the 'right' and 'left'. To have such would be counter productive to their agenda to total control. The lust to dominate is undermined by the limitations set by conforming to a rigid ideological mindset. Who actually ARE the real rulers? I would suspect that Mayer Rothschild hit the mark when he quipped about controlling a nations money making it irrelevant who makes it laws. The money power drives national agendas. Whoever controls that controls virtually everything. The way that a money power controls those in political power is support both sides in any feud and blackmail the winner by the threat of supporting the loser in any future feud. It works and has worked for centuries. When the money power wishes to gain control of an enemy state it has to enlist allies as it of itself has no armies in the field to force compliance. It must use subversion before coercion. It must weaken first then divide then conquer. If it can achieve its aims of total control without firing a shot that is preferable to war as war is costly while treason is cheap. Ideologues fit in nicely here as the attack dogs of the money power. They are used as the means to demoralize the target country  by spreading lies and destroying a targeted peoples ability to think rationally. Ideologues are useful in destabilizing a target country by utilizing identity politics and pitting each victim group against every other victim group eventually rendering the targeted state incapable of functioning. Crisis is precipitated resulting in either invasion or civil war. It is at this time that the money power and their functionaries step in and seize total control. What then of the ideologues? They are unnecessary and now a liability as their intractability and irrationality render them useless in the new totalitarian system which brooks no protest of any kind. The ideologues are liquidated. What emerges is a kind of high tech neo feudalism. At the top a unassailable elite protected by a ruthless pervasive police state and at the bottom a mass of serfs stripped of all ability to resist. Any serf showing any sign of initiative or any spark of will is killed much like the fate of the Helots in ancient Sparta. I don't think the vast majority of the ideologues realize that their ultimate fate is sealed when they follow the orders of the ruling elite. They think that they will run things when the 'glorious revolution' occurs. They are unaware they are simply what Lenin called 'useful idiots'. They are Judas Goats but their egos are so huge that they are blind to their manipulation. One may see in the person of Woodrow Wilson an example of a duped ideologue lamenting his gullibility a few years after being conned into signing the federal reserve act. Or one may simply examine the fate of the ideologues in Stalin's Russia. The international communists (mostly Jewish Bolsheviks) were liquidated after the Stalin-Trotsky split over world communism vs communism in 1 country. The criminal won out over the idealist. The same applies to the money power. They don't give a tinkers damn about ideology, they only care about gaining and holding power by any and all means necessary. This makes them incredibly dangerous.  

[John CEFD]

Yes, you're right, i'd say most of the brainpower behind the globalist agenda are cynical or, at least, ruthless enough to put their beliefs in "hold" in order to get a reasonable degree of control and then put the ideas on practice. I mean, the left has always been this way and now most socialist or "progressive" ideas are being funded by the State-cartels of banking and big corporations for at least a century now, destroying the free-market (most efficiently by the control over the production of fiduciary money and generalized inflation) and putting the blame on the free-market itself, e.g, look at the occupy Wall Street movement some years back, when the disaster was caused, once gain, by expansive fiduciary credit not backed by savings and bubbles via State Central Banking and the idiots wanting more regulation and State control over the banking and credit sector. It's even funnier when you realize the the "cold war" wasn't the classical portrait of "America vs USSR", but the american government, in some administrations and under the globalist elite, helping the USSR via loans or helping american/western government-friendly corporations selling technology to the backwards communist block (as with Chinea in the 90's); not to mention the total control that the globalists have had over education on america and the western world over the last century, with new educational theories stating the the role of school is to produce "socially responsabile" citizens, or to teach, not exacly technical stuff such as grammar or arithmetic, but how the capitalist system opresses (insert 50 pg list of opressed whatevers), things that the Frankfurt School and Gramsci have been teaching and telling the left at least since 1920 onwards (not to mention that Stalin and the bolsheviks knew about it loved the idea! But he was clever enough to not bring it to the USSR itself, but to, on his own words, "make the west rot, and the smell even worse".

So, yea, even today, the real and ultimate power-struggle in the world is bettween globalists (with the help of keynesians economics; socialism/comunism/progressivism) vs Nationalists (in here are gathered everyone who opposes a centralized world or western State, being conservatives, liberals, anacaps, libertarians etc.), or, in the other words, the Nation State and it's cultural values/heritage against Global State/progressivism.