Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It might have been different if someone put 60,000,000 Joules of fast-moving airplane and jet fuel into the building core about a quarter to a third of the way down from the top, as opposed to dropping a fork into a toaster oven.

  • Upvote 2
Posted
24 minutes ago, A4E said:

That is normal for a strong building. End of thread.

Kinda my point.

 

15 minutes ago, shirgall said:

It might have been different if someone put 60,000,000 Joules of fast-moving airplane and jet fuel into the building core about a quarter to a third of the way down from the top, as opposed to dropping a fork into a toaster oven.

I totally agree.  

O52Ri6.gif

 

  • Upvote 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/14/2017 at 9:08 AM, shirgall said:

It might have been different if someone put 60,000,000 Joules of fast-moving airplane and jet fuel into the building core about a quarter to a third of the way down from the top, as opposed to dropping a fork into a toaster oven.

I stand corrected. It was a refrigerator not a toaster oven.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4632232/Grenfell-Tower-insulation-tiles-FAILED-fire-tests.html?ITO=1490

No news on whether it had 7,000 gallons of jet fuel in it.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.