FCC Repeal of Net Nutrality

[ProRational]

https://www.elitedaily.com/money/the-worlds-10-largest-media-conglomerates 

Alright Washington Post has a long history of not fact checking and not keeping information relevant (instead of the fall of Raqqa) they were up in arms about a few of Trumps tweets.

Further this with Ajit Pai and the passing of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 this can be used to bully independent journalists who do not follow the narrative of Mainstream media. Ask your self this Trump-Russia conspiracy and the mention of but the one percent. Combine that with the "ANTI FA" movement using violence to censor free-speech in particular against conservatives. Now Jeff Bezos is worth 100 billion dollars, he owns Amazon as well as the Huffington Post. Amazon has a history of taking conservative books down at the first allegations of Libel and under their policies to enforce this turn a blind eye for Liberal authored books even at the slightest hint of this. Now look at the second video look at 4:12 (4 minutes 12 seconds) if net neutrality existed then and this was illegal when Comcast had been throttling Netflix to coerce them into a merger. Why wouldn't the media conglomerations use this to censor the independent journalists into only promoting one singular agenda. Also cross reference Amazon and it's on the Panama papers just by the name Amazon. Who benefits more from Net Neutrality being repealed and who is accusing Trump of Russian collusion. I will quote Goebble's on this one (Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty) also I will add who benefits more from the disarmament of the U.S.A. the Liberal progressive agenda. Look at the names on the list (one promoted third wave feminism Emily Watson hailed by the U.N. as Women of the Year) Hypocritical of the U.N. when they smuggled their sex slaves to the area of operations in which they went so far as defaming Kathryn Bolkovac for exposing it. Also, Hillary hired P.I.'s to investigate the background of women's lives to bring up dirt on them who brought accusations against Bill Clinton. And then while running for President she told women to come forward in-order to come forward on their sexual assault. So tell me who benefits from the repealing of net-neutrality?

 

 

 

Edited November 29, 2017 by ProRational
Incorrect grammer in sentance on Hillary

[ProRational]

To add onto this look at recent Project Veritas and their recent battle with Washington Post

 

[barn]

(funsies)

 

 

23 hours ago, ProRational said:

Incorrect grammer in sentance on Hillary

That's 'okeii' she's not worth the 'grammer' or many 'sentance'-s

[ofd]

Quote

And then while running for President she told women to come forward in-order to come forward on their sexual assault. So tell me who benefits from the repealing of net-neutrality?

The ISPs of course. They will charge you additonal fees for services you get now without paying.

[ProRational]

It's not just the ISP's who benefit it is the same individuals who under the telecommunications act of 1996 (the deregulation) of multiple media/cross media ownership. Jeff Bezos founder of Amazon and Washington Post. Several media mergers (pretty much a violation of anti-trust as well as monopoly laws) To further the repeal of Net Neutrality is not only an attack on independent journalism it is also a sneaky way through multiple steps, the deregulation of cross media ownership, as well as the repeal of net neutrality was to further a progressive movement and institute a biased state media with in the country. And the question becomes small government with minimal regulation as well as necessary enforcement of various laws to prevent such things. Also, the question is not the privilege of the 1% but a question of what they do with it. People with the necessary funds could outright buy a country if the media are on their side (as far as political agenda) to influence the people's opinions. If you hear the same thing from news organization's that people once trusted (you will effectively eliminate the apparent need of a fourth estate in this case independent journalism to maintain a necessary degree of transparency for such individuals). Both sides not accepting nuance was taken advantage of by both sides of the aisle. One the few owners of media in this country did just that by claiming that the Russian's were behind the "fake news" it turns out a young man who couldn't make a living in Macedonia turned to the internet. Who is to blame for the fake news articles being spread, it was add trackers from google. The ad-trackers moved the articles from nasty sites such as porn and other sites to the mainstream social media. I will further this by saying the Russian collusion on hacking was a bit suspect as far as DNC hacks because Hillary's own campaign members did not trust her (after the email wipe on her email servers) the breach was further facilitated by a chaos hacker known as Gucifer. Gucifer had a reputation of causing chaos between multiple countries as well as against Russia. Before the fake news regarding "Russian fake news" came out he gave several user names as well as passwords to various DNC accounts to the media while in jail state side. Using the dark web he could have furthered this by releasing various user names further create chaos by individuals on the dark web. But the easiest and most efficient way to get those emails was for an individual to use windows dual boot, and upload onto an external ssd the emails when using a stripped down  version of a linux OS. The emails would have been downloaded in the shortest time and with out suspicion. Further this by the fact that while Hillary was in Secretary of State she encountered the same email malware as well as the fact that anyone with an internet connection could have downloaded this. That was the case where a power company on the eastern coast of U.S. freaked out because a guy on his personal laptop downloaded such malware. Various journalist's have done great thing when faced with the violent censorship of state media. From the burning of a couple UK terrorists working in the daesh controlled areas. As well as those that supported the Arab Spring (of which the U.S. as well as the U.K. was giving methods of web tracking to suppress with-in states that the U.S.A was sponsoring. A lot of journalist died to bring the truth which the truth will always win even if people may chose to ignore it. While Snowden may have been hailed either as a terrorist or a freedom fighter, our country on social media as well as in the media are proving the point Journalist's need protection especially when government's attempt to create a hostile environment for the truth. But both sides put up a false flag in an attempt to cover for the truth. Now Mueller was presented a difficult task of either cleaning the dirty internal politics of the state or to only burn those necessary to save the American people from killing each other. Either way a bit chain application will prevent such leaks, as well as provide the necessary oversight to protect the Journalists as well as the state secrets. But if one side prefers to hide the truth then the other side can counter due to the unnecessary lack of oversight involved. And I will further this by stating that the PanPrs presented an interesting case for the lack of oversight under obama's admin, countries (and their companies) were funding terrorists in Syria while avoiding the embargo put upon any country that does business with terrorists. This include the Saudi's whose king funded/oversaw a charity organization that directly provided material support for Al-Qaeda.

[Spiritual-Autarky]

The companies themselves would like to compete and don't want to have their hands by the govermnet..

 

Stiill, I wish couldbe done  in a much less reckless way than aboloshing the net-neutrality...

 

That he allows such sleazebag Drohi  POS llike Pai..........

He trusts them to give him good advice, they shouldn't take advantage his trust and suggest like this...

Are these critisicm valid to oppose the decision or not? (what I'm askign bacially)

 Oh welll.... I guess you'll probably have to adjust to the abuse of by comapnies.

 

It will  probably easier to mine cryptocurrencies... theiroperating cost will probably be