Misunderstanding ‘regression to the mean’

[fstearns1]

Stefan refers to ‘regression to the mean’ as if it were a biological phenomenon. Please refer to page 357 of ‘The Bell Curve’ to disabuse yourself of that notion.

[barn]

Hello @fstearns1

Well, there's... that

(see. Parent-offspring regression)

Barnsley

p.s. (isn't particularly important, though speaks about your views how you chose the language... Countering an effect is only possible if it exists... So, yeah. Your ask is not valid.)