Jump to content

AccuTron

Member
  • Posts

    696
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    7

AccuTron last won the day on December 19 2016

AccuTron had the most liked content!

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

762 profile views

AccuTron's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

131

Reputation

  1. Lately, I notice that all forum topics show on my latest Mac Safari as the original post, then a huge vertical blue bar, and no other text anywhere. This website is now unusable. I won't bother to look for a reply here since it wouldn't show. Blue bar is gone, or not.
  2. A+B. This is very well established BY LEGITIMATE SCIENTISTS. And any fool can just look. Search climate fraud and spend your next hundred hours reading about illegal math, illegal physics, falsified data, money trail, etc.
  3. "MGTOW is a product of men's tendency to hold grudges. As such, it is rabidly irrational." -- That is such reflex shaming tactic, based upon an opening statement which is untrue, that I am guessing Brainwright is a girl. If you are not a girl, BW, then you are a brainwashed mangina and really need to look into it. Seriously. I wonder how many MGTOW videos and comments you actually saw. Because your statement is so devoid of core understanding, that it is essentially fabrication. If you actually read the comment sections, you'd see many men, different ages, who simply saw with their own true eyes how very often and very severely men are destroyed by a woman with a mood, and chose to avoid women and avoid the problems, ya' can't hold a grudge if nothing happens in the first place. And the courts are bogus...now I'm just repeating the standard stuff, go watch the videos for better analysis. The TRUTH is that men have a tendency to honestly analyze -- something rare in females -- and we honestly see how dangerous and worse-than-worthless most women are. No woman commentator, or Brainwright him/herself, will speak of the elephant in the room: the women (large yet valid generalization) are crap, they are NOT attractive, NOT feminine, NOT very bright, NOT honest, and possibly NOT well behaved. So how do those female widespread (pun) traits supposedly originate with male grudge??? Victim blaming. Running with the pun, Caley is on target. It endlessly impresses me how many females don't understand that they are...girls. Squishy warm body parts, well behaved. Without that, women don't have any value, in fact it's negative value. Quote by Blonde In The Belly Of The Beast, look her up for image, she's the perfect out of the box porn toy, not a bitter spinster with persistent nose zits: "Modern women no longer have anything of value to offer men." Women aren't very interesting to talk to, very surface, run from uncomfy facts like roaches from a room light. Chronic liars. And can be lots of time, money, trouble, and THE MAJOR POINT OF MGTOW, the man's will and activities are blended and diluted with the female's, and while this may be a good thing, often it is not. I can cook and clean just fine by myself. The following instructions are fundamental for a woman's value, and can have other things added later if deserved, yet the core must first honestly be there: Give head, make sandwich, shut up. And keep yourself clean and healthy. --- Like those are bad things!!! In my senior citizen life, I've maybe met one woman who understood that. MGTOW men, thru sharing endless stories, tell so very much the same thing. "The juice isn't worth the squeeze" is practically a slogan. So how is it a "grudge" to see that the product offered for sale is worse than junk??? Saving my best shotgun for Camille: If you put that same question on many Youtube men's channels (Howard Dare, MGTOW Is Freedom, Sgt. Terence Pott at Redonkulas.com, and the under-appreciated brilliance of AngryMGTOW are good starts), you'd get a philosophy course provided by many men, far more than my overworked typing fingers can provide here. Actually try it. I will cover the most immediately obvious points: You, a girl, right up front, are asking for "strategies." Which is femalese for "manipulative techniques." What about the strategy of just being a good sexual servant and rip out of your brain with laser blasts any trace of entitlement? Oops, don't wanna mention that. Not like it's perfectly obvious or anything....It is clear that you are trying to weasel your way into a men's space, playing the innocent card, that it's really just about "that women can use to improve their lives and interactions with people (i.e. to keep men engaged honorably before they MGTOW) " I don't even know what that means. Not just because it's missing at least one verb. Actually, I, that is to say, we, DO know what it means. Improve their (women's) lives = but the heck with the men's lives? All about that girl greed? Interactions with people...a generic innocent glance to the side, oh it's just for the betterment of humanity, you know we women are so spiritual and all. WTF is engaged honorably before they (become) MGTOW? Do you mean "keep them bullshitted as long as possible before they come to the unmistakable conclusion that we belong in the dumpster"? As you would be told in any comments section: "What are you really doing here?" Girls, we are on to your shit, we tell each other, it's the internet age, and we know your brains better than you do. The ugly base truth of female nature has been let out of the bag, and it won't go back in, no matter how many times you try to innocently flutter your eyes.
  4. " previously acting from a subconscious level but fairly harmless "...fairly harmless? Ask the divorce raped homeless men about that, plus many others, which you'll surely hear/see if you stay with the MGTOW men, and there are at least several to listen to with good value. As Meister said, I think you misunderstand. MGTOW is in large part about how women's minds work, as self defense. Like learning magician's tricks. We are on to the tricks. A woman using different tactics is still seen as a woman using tactics, just different ones. And we get better and better at spotting the false moments. Put in the hours. Howard Dare, MGTOW is Freedom, AngryMGTOW, Heartbern, just a few names.
  5. Note my edit: "But friend zone HER. She will love you(r ability to do stuff for her) in no time!"
  6. Also, were some of the unmarried men burdened with health issues that kept them at a disadvantage in dating and marriage? That would skew the data.
  7. All crystal balls are inherently broken, there is no way to know what will happen in any of those situations. Which choice has your passion? Tho', caution there, passion may be emotional more than appreciative. The woman in Denver, I get the impression you are wanting a situation, and you are looking for a person to put next to you in the play-house family car. Being flippant a bit, asking if the tail is wagging the dog. Another consideration: if SHTF in some way, where will you be in the most resilient situation?
  8. Your icon image is small and blurry, but you look like you are still young, 20-30's. Make a calendar note for ten years from now and see if you are then still baffled.
  9. Back up to the starting line: all this alarmism was brought up to begin with by...drum roll... -falsified data -illegal math and physics --HUGE money trail So don't sweat (pun) any of it. The climate is doing what it always has. So are humans (see also "forked tongue").
  10. Keep handy ripe bananas, also a palmful of mixed nuts and raisins together. They stave hunger very well for at least a half hour and are healthy face stuffing. I've moved much more plant based, and never have a grumble tummy. Don't forget that a glass of water also fills the belly awhile.
  11. This is a very important video. A number of victims are mentioned, for those of you thinking there are no known victims. Also, look at 27:38 in the video; compare to Imgur:
  12. The speculation is by the Portuguese police investigator, and he put it rather bluntly in his report. You did read it, right? I think I put the link someplace above. And the near perfect match of two suspects descriptions with the Podesta brothers...that's two matches...and they were staying 1/3 mile away at the time, at the villa of a world class pedophile. That's a bit much on the innocent-coincidence scale. And by the way, the girl is dead, the police dogs found blood and cadaver scent in the parent's car, the apartment, the mother's pants. D..E..A...D. So no matter who did it, somebody did it. That's not speculation. The young child didn't spontaneously just up and die, putting her blood in spots on a wall. It seems that the brothers who are near spittin' images for two wanted posters, known to be in the area during the crime, staying at a veritable HQ of world class pedophilia, would be a darned good place to start looking. Then the aware citizen should ask why this is not being pursued. Red pill, dammit. I'm assuming you've not really delved into this. Basic Fact Number One: dispose of bodies; they have essentially unlimited and unchecked resources for this. Another Basic Fact Number One: It's easy to get children that no one will miss, won't leave a trail. Plenty of homeless, runaways, the usual, sourced from a slew of countries, including Haiti with orphans. Human trafficking is huge. And no, not completely suspect. Why would you say that? If there's a body found decomposing, it's after the fact, and any reports regarding the crime are completely suspect? How about check and verify the reports before dismissal. It's amazing that on this FDR forum, I cannot get traction by even one person as far as I can tell, who will state: "Yes, the wanted posters look very much like the Podesta brothers." There's a determination here to absolutely avoid the smoking gun evidence. Eyewitness descriptions for Wanted posters are evidence. The Portuguese police inspector's conclusions are evidence. Alefantis denying he has a basement, yet referencing it as a storage area in a food article, that is evidence. MSM shills couldn't do a better job. That is most curious.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.