Jump to content

cab21

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    547

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by cab21

  1. cab21
    You could go find a new place to live. if you are calling a person a idiot, and living in that persons house, what sense does that make?
  2. cab21
    a person does not get to claim more land than that person is able to use. The land is claimed through use, not the ability to use. just looking at a apartment example, a landowner is using land by renting out the use of apartment to clients. the landowner will be in charge of building the buildings and some maintenance and management of the buildings, and the client will be in charge of what is in the contract. that would be separate from someone claiming some geographic space and never doing anything to use or maintain that space. if a landowner thought he was no longer able to or interested in using the apartments, the apartments could be sold to a new landowner . part of the agreement with the clients can be a rent to buy, or the rent clients can become investors and gain equity that way, or the building can be sold to the rent clients as much as it could be sold to a new buyer according to the contract.
  3. cab21
    but you said in your example that no unclaimed land existed in the scenario. if all the land was taken, there would be no more land to take. if some of the land was taken, then there would be some land to take. using force to prevent someone from finding a consenting sexual partner is a violion the fact of no more land to claim, because all land is claimed, is not equivalent and not a violation. noone is preventing someone from claiming unclaimed land. land has to be separate into two categories just like consenting partners, and nonconsenting nonpartners with land , it would be unclaimed land, and claimed land. if all land is claimed land, then there would not be unclaimed land, just as if all others are nonconsenting nonpartners, there would not be any consenting partners. both situations fit the tough luck test, without violating anyone's rights or making rights unequal.
  4. cab21
    they have the same right, no matter what land is available. sort of like a person still has the right to consenting sex, even if noone consents to have sex with the person, and thus the person does not have consenting sex. there is less land, not less of a right. there is not consenting sex, but still the same right to have consenting sex. the right does not depend on the supply to where there is no right if there is no supply or there is a right if there is a supply
  5. cab21
    if one spot is used, people have the right to go to a different spot and use that different spot.
  6. cab21
    the person walking in front of a bus is the one who initiates aggression if the bus had the right of way. the question is who had the right of way according to the rules of the owner of the road.
  7. cab21
    those not born have the same legal right to be the first to create as those that are born.
  8. cab21
    post the arguments here? paying to find out what the arguments are, from the person who made the claim, is a bit strange.
  9. cab21
    let use know when you have them uploaded. ok, the ancient Egyptian anarchist writings would be a interesting search, not sure much will be found if it was successfully suppressed. people have enough disagreements with ancient writings that were published. it's easier to find stories of "it is believed" rather than evidence for " what was". looking at the culture and reasons is important for this kind of research. perhaps the first work here can examine a specific government or country. and then future projects examine others. "USA government and Art history" for a example. it can look at art created to embrace the union and art created to criticize the union. some art is a response to human trauma. i don't know if your school has just focused on trauma? is it also going over romantic art and art created as a response to human inspiration, celebration, pleasure, accomplishment, idealism, love, connection? art covers a fuller range of the human condition than trauma and negatives. it could be looked at if triumph is a result of trauma, and what trauma is there in nature itself. success can be a important achievement in the face of failure. between struggle, and effort , and achievement, and what relationship they have can be part of the study.
  10. cab21
    what is a reasonable pay and accounting system to compensate everyone as suppose to a previous owner? making 1 payment seems simpler than 6 billion payments and all the accounting involved. first to create, first served this is equal rights, there is no discrimination in who can be first. everyone has the equal right to be first to create.
  11. cab21
    are these posted anywhere to listen? that can be a interesting project What is the history of Ayn Rand almost not being published, or Stephan not being published? My understanding was that Rand found a publisher for We The Living a couple years after writing it, and Stephan has published his writings on the internet. it has to be separated which books are not published because of government, and which books are not published simply because the person did not self publish or find a private publisher for the work. definitions and criteria are a good start for examination and research here. is this to be a free market anarchy capitalism anarchy or all forms of anarchy? establishing which state, is part of this, and the way the state molds. it's a interesting idea to take on. "which state" has to be taken on, as states can take many forms. say the exploration of public schools, which ones teach atlas shrugged, which ones don't then private schools can be explored, which ones teach atlas shrugged, which ones don't.
  12. cab21
    There is a difference between buying out previous owners, and buying out anyone that "wants" to own. Paying 1 million to a previous owner, vs. paying 1 million to 6 billion people that “want” to own, or even splitting the 1 million payment to all 6 billion people that “want” to be owners. if a new company wants to buy out a frequency that is being used, the company would by from the company currently using the frequency. people would be excluded if they were not able to buy from the current user, but not being able to buy is not some claim to be compensated for not being able to make a deal with a owner. if a frequency is not being used, the first to use it owns it if a frequency is being used, that person owns it until it is sold to a new owner, and that new owner then owns the frequency I'm saying is people would make claims of wanting to be "included", but not want to, or work to be actually included. Being "included" means getting the financing to buy and pay for anything that is being used, if someone can just claim "ill pay 5 million dollars", when they know the winning bid is "5.5 million", the person never worked on the ability to actually pay, and only had to claim the desire to pay. If that person gets paid the same amount as the person that actually earned 5.3 million dollars, the person had to work a lot harder to actually make 5.3 million dollars than to simply claim a desire to pay 5 million dollars. Markets need to based on the ability to buy, not the “want” to buy, or there is more incentive to "want" than have the "ability". it takes less effort to "want" something that to have the "ability" to get something.
  13. cab21
    how much compensation are people to get from anything a person is "excluded " from ? why would a person want to be "included" in anything, if the amount of compensation from "exclusion" makes it better to just sit and collect compensation without work?
  14. cab21
    What kind of art projects are you interested in creating? what private teachers have you found for the artwork that you want to create?
  15. cab21
    if the cause is the end point, is that fatalism or determinism? i'm a bit mixed on terms, but i thought determinism was about cause and effect, not effect and cause?
  16. cab21
    if i got this right physics are deterministic,gene mutations are part of physicstherefor gene mutations are deterministic. physics are deterministic,free will is not part of physicstherefor free will can be non- deterministic? I'm not thinking of a definition of free will that could be deterministic. i was thought that will was part of physics, rather than not being apart of physics, so any will would be tied into physics mutations are not part of free will i would assume, or people could choose to grow gills or have children that grow gills, and growing gills is physical, and other animals do grow gills. perhaps genetic engineering could have people that grow gills by manipulation the genes? that humans can know the genetics of a baby before the egg and sperm meet because it's deterministic, or do humans just not know because of ignorance rather than randomness? can humans know that a miscarry is going to happen because and then select for a nonmiscary instead?
  17. cab21
    so if got this right, old testament includes man claiming that mans actions were ordered by god, when the actions were not ordered by god, but in fact ordered by man( government/priests/patriarchs/would be rulers)? So what are your beliefs on human common ancestry and who are ancestors were and were not evolution wise? I have heard other creation theories say god made Adam separate from any other being, and that Adam was the most genetically perfect human, and would have been created with a higher degree of reason than Adams ancestors could have. I do question that as it sounds like Adam in the story quickly disobeyed god, and his son disobeyed god, and his ancestors quickly disobeyed god, all with direct contact with god in the stories. It seems people with more reason would not disobey after such direct evidence?
  18. cab21
    trail by jury might sort more of it out, sounds like it depends on the timing, and that it's just the cop that did that shooting that would be tried. the context of not having time is a factor, such as "this is not working, he is a threat to saftly" or " i don't want to deal with this, lets go with a nazi solution".
  19. cab21
    what does his weight have to do with this? a 90 pound person could easily kill with a screwdriver doupt it, want to take a test? i don't know what the situaiton was, but if the guy was stabbing in the nonvest area, sounds like it had potential for more damage than where the guy did stab ( the vest area) ok with giving it to a jury ok with having dro's handle the situation as dro's would see fit.
  20. cab21
    government is one area of non free trade
  21. cab21
    people can choose who to freely asosiate with a example can be two people choosing to be partners. those two people choose to raise a child that child choosing to have a relationship with the parents. once everyone here is a adult, the relationship between all of them is really a choice. early in the childs develupment its not so much of a free trade from the perspective of the child, who is not making such choices at all really, but when the person is making adult choices, the person can choose to leave and refuse any gifts or relationship with parents or a estate. two people that never have kids, can certainly be considered able to choose a voluntary relationship with voluntary wealth transfership. someone that never has kids can choose who gets the inheritance by free choice. it's a matter of family though voluntary action on the side of adults vs forced action on the side of adults.
  22. cab21
    family can be simply a form of trade, really a voluntary one. wealth gained by free trade, can be distributed by free trade, and giving to family members can be free trade. now stolen wealth is a different story, and paying back stolen wealth can be part of justice, but that's a separate issue than the free trade of family with created wealth rather than stolen wealth.
  23. cab21
    http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf so how does this relate to this paper? is exodus 20-31 or whatever a free market covenant between a people and god? what happened to those that chose not to agree to the covenant?
  24. cab21
    40000÷525949=0.076 laws per minute
  25. cab21
    525949 minutes in a year 43829.1 minutes in a month where does 13.1 come from?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept