TheBen

So transgender parents can choose which bathroom to bring their children into but non-transgendered mothers and fathers must stick to their biologically assigned bathrooms? I don't want to straw man you here but this seems to be what you are saying. Please let me know if I am mistaken. I really think this issue is way too complex for the government to get involved in. Wouldn't it be best to just leave the decision of making these rules up to the establishment rather than use violence to enforce state given doctrine?

A question to all here. Should fathers be allowed to accompany their daughters into women's bathroom's in order to protect them from sexual deviants? Should the law allow for this type of thing to happen?

Thank you and I completely agree with you here. I also believe all people should be allowed to pursue happiness in any way they see fit as long as they don't infringe on the rights of others. I wish the "trans" community the best, I just don't think they should be forcing their views on other people, most notably children. I have no intentions of hurting anyone of this orientation, though I personally don't want to be around them, so they would not be permitted to enter my home. I do think that the PC culture has taken this issue way too far and children are being victimized in the process. I hope these types of issues get more attention among all persuasions of people and the consensus becomes what you have written above. --Ben --Ben

You continue to lend credence to my hypothesis. Are you going to answer my honest and straightforward question? Do you agree than children should not be "transified" or are you of the opinion that it is okay to inject children with hormones in order to attempt to change their biologically assigned traits?

This is why I said, "I believe I communicated my point quite clearly..." I do think he was picking a nit in order to obscure what I was saying by focusing on something completely irrelevant. Both previous respondents to what I was saying haven't yet agreed that children should not be injected with hormones to change their biologically inherited traits. This confirms my hypothesis that they think this form of child abuse is okay. This is despicable in my opinion and must be called out more, even if the PC police are going to throw ad hominem attacks.

I will not bow to the Cultural Marxists' shaping of the English language plus I didn't even use the word this person said I used. Am I not allowed to ask questions? Don't straw man me please. You can re-read the conversation and have more understanding of it if you like, or not. --Ben

I believe I communicated my point quite clearly and you are not the arbiter of language. Do you agree than children should not be "transified" or are you of the opinion that it is okay to inject children with hormones in order to attempt to change their biologically assigned traits? --Ben

As long as the "trans" community doesn't condemn people that take part in the "transification" of children, I will consider them a predator parasitical segment of society. I have seen far too many stories in the news of this happening and I have yet to hear of one "trans" person openly objecting and showing their disgust of this, as they should. This type of child abuse cannot be tolerated IMO. I won't respond to your ad-hominems and other vapid ideas though I will add, "You say I am a bigot, fine then, I am a bigot. I am large. I contain multitudes." --Ben

"Transgendered" people are people that are self identifying as being fucked up psychologically and in a sexual sense. People that open carry are simply exercising their right and duty to self protection. Also people were not afraid of "trans" people using the bathroom pre-transgendered focused laws. It is societies catering to this particular brand of disordered people that is most startling. --Ben

The term racism has no value because one must follow up with the question, "What do you mean by that?"

You are right and your God is "science" and it's Pope is NASA.

I think you mean, "Would China have faked the Moon Landings without the west?" And I think you can find the answer if you look into the Chinese culture. Did they have a history of faking things like this such as the Great Moon Hoax of 1835? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Moon_Hoax I don't know as I haven't looked into Chinese history much but I'm sure the answers are out there... --Ben

The easiest and most effective way to change the world is to change yourself. You think that the issue here is your brother and his family but the problem is you. It is your duty as someone who is striving to be a moral person to pick your battles wisely and spread virtue where it can grow. In my opinion you are not helping your brother and his family at all and you may even be hurting them. You are trying to use logic and reason with people that refuse to take even the smallest steps at bettering the lives of themselves and their family. I'm sure you have heard of Dunning and Kroeger. When you bring logic and evidence to people to try to sway their opinion, they can tend to double down and believe in their shit values even more. I would urge you to please stop torturing yourself by attempting to help those who have shown very little sign of positive growth. Move on and get over this situation. Go find good people and be around them. Shape your life so that you are enriched by the daily activities that you choose to do. Maybe living a positive life will show your brother's children that it is indeed possible to overcome and achieve happiness. If you continue to "value" your relationship with your brother and his family, then you may be validating their dysfunction in the eyes of his children. I think that this is the best and perhaps the only way you can help this horrid situation. --Ben

Also there is only 1 potentially real picture of Earth from space and it's from 1972. All the others are composites or fake CGI.

That's the cointelpro disinfo site. The real flat earthers are at: http://ifers.boards.net/

The Matrix has you.

Lets say I had this friend who told me one day that he thinks nukes don't exist. He says that he had been looking for proof but hasn't been able to find anything that has convinced him. Can anyone here point me to information or resources that would convince my friend that nukes do in fact exist? Also, I just want to add that my friend does think that the sun is undergoing nuclear reactions, so the sun is not proof to him that humans have mastered atomic technology to the point where they can create a nuclear bomb. He does think that nuclear bombs are possible for humans to make. They just haven't been able to do so yet...

It is assumed that the casino's maximum edge in Blackjack is about 51% and the customers edge is about 49%. If the casino figures out that they have been giving more than 50% edge and now thinks that they can recover lost funds because of theirs error, then the customer should be given back their money every time they make an error and do not make a play that ensures them their 49% edge. You can't have it both ways. The essence of gaming is that you try to do your best to exploit your opponents mistakes and these "regulations" go against this notion. In the end I think they casinos are making a huge mistake here and will end up losing more of their customer base than will make this type of policy profitable for them. Plus, casinos are scum. Fuck them. This is why I play poker and stay far away from the no win games the casino offers.

I think this is some dangerous and horrible advice mostly because it is probably exactly what OP wants to hear. Though I'd like to hear what Tservitive(OP) thinks about the comments made thus far...

I thought this vid was a pretty good take on social anxiety.

"We" are all individuals that each have our own opinions about this event. So if it is your goal to group us all together into a collection of crazy "conspiracy theorists" that blindly believe in a groupthink notion of what happened that day then you will find that to not be the case here. Speaking for myself, I really don't know what happened that day. All I really know is that the 9/11 official story fairytale is certainly not the truth. And concerning the bolded text from your comment, I can't decipher what you are trying to ask there. Are you talking about the hijacker terrorists or some other group of bad guys that the government needs to garner public sentiment in order to wage their wars?

This would be a good enough explanation for me if the steel melting was the only contested issue that happened that day. Unfortunately there are hundreds of other points that would have to be addressed as well. And this idea of annealing does not offer an explanation for building 7(the 3rd building that came down that day in textbook demolition fashion).

Thank you trodas and A4E and others. I think that the majority of your points are right on and have not been addressed/refuted in this thread. It was finding out the truths/untruths about 9/11 that brought me over to the good side and I'm sure that this paradigm shift continues to open the eyes of many throughout the world. And don't be discouraged by the naysayers as I'm sure there are some passive readers of threads like this which will have a seed planted in their subconscious that will grow in time. I also agree with some of the others that independent of 9/11 truth and the moon landing hoax, one can logically conclude that government is evil and also unnecessary. Though for me it increased my "escape velocity" out of the statist mindset to a high degree.