Jump to content

super.bueno

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    47

  • Joined

 Content Type 

Everything posted by super.bueno

  1. super.bueno
    Good question
  2. super.bueno
    The first two would be?
  3. super.bueno
    Then we are on the same course.
  4. super.bueno
    Fish stinks from the head down, and yes I would gather some money to feed a hungry child in Africa, or volunteer for 6 months for example. What about you sunshine? Why did i got -1 on this?
  5. super.bueno
    I think that the most of us, are just victims of the victims ( some of us are victims of our parents, and yet again our parent have been victims of their parents ), and this is a stream that should be somehow stopped, otherwise nothing or barely nothing can be achieved towards the education that we need.
  6. super.bueno
    1. Some people are vastly more economically valuable than others Says who? Were you able to attend some championship of this sort? If Nikola Tesla stayed in his village somewhere in Croatia , and didnt come to New York to realize his ideas, everything that we have in terms of electricity would exist , and he wasnt economically valuable at all, you have this examples throughout history. This is a ridiculous argument . 2. I'll pay whatever I choose to pay for shoes, depending on what's offered to me. I have no say in the matter as to where they are made, unless I am the one making them, which I'm not. Please explain exactly how the price I pay for Chinese-made shoes, the making of which I have no influence or control, is altered in any way by the property I may or may not have inherited from my father, or may or may not leave to my son in my will. Whats offered to you is 99,99% chinese I asked you a straight question ? I am trying to show you and its now more than obvious that you only care about the depth of your pocket and how shallow your arguments. Saying that you will pay whatever price for shoes, just explains your knowledge about external world and basics of economics. Checkmate. Ok I get it, is there anything in your life that is not subject to trade?
  7. super.bueno
    So you re not willing to sacrifice a bit in order to have more righteous world. What if for example somebody just doesnt get a chance to express his/her productivity or talent, but its completely ok to you to use benefits of other peoples low cost labour? I bet that somewhere in China , right now there are at least 100 geniouses in whatever sphere of life working in some stinky factory, so you could buy nike, adidas, la coste for a low price. Are you willing to take those jobs back to America or Canada, but to pay far more than you are paying now? Why do you think that 97% of the american professional sportsmen are african american, or why Brazil has the most talented players when it comes to soccer ( football ) ? You think this is because they are genetically more dominant than the others. Of course not, its because of the social environment in which they are living.
  8. super.bueno
    You know there is no argument that cannot be relativized, what about 25 sq/m + 1, and what about 2 workshops and what about a small piece of land + 12 sq/m...I mean cmon... One last question: Do you find the fact that Chinese, Indian, Malaysian worker or a child gets 2 dollars per 12h shift, as long as you have cheap goods? Familiy can be simply a form of free trade, really volunatry one? Can you give me an example of how family can be a form of trade? It could be possible but between cyborgs, between human absolutely not, Is it like i am trading my sperm for a hot meal, and clean underpants every day, I mean I ve heard everything but this is.... Abolished by free minded people between them. There should be no excessive wealth accumulation as long as you have homeless , as long as you have hungry people and single moms struggling every day, do you have a problem with that?
  9. super.bueno
    Dont be such a brat, I know that you need attention. if I am a communist then you shouldnt call me sir, but comrade Why do you have a need to put stickers on people ( communist, not communist does it matter really? ) I am a lone wolf, I am presenting my ideas no isms involved. First and foremost correct me if I am wrong but you sir do not know what communism is all about right? Be honest, dont google ,, communism I apologize, but I have a strong feeling that you dont have a clue what libertarian idea is all about as well. If you think, that libertarian philosofy means that you should get rid of a state repression , and enjoy bigger income then I congratulate you. Why do we have to compete like this, we are grown ups, arent we? Peace brother BtW If you want bring it on, i am more than ready to start a debate on any given subject, I guess we are both fighting for a better world. I guess so...
  10. super.bueno
    Could you give your recipe please?
  11. super.bueno
    +1 for you, I admit that it could look like a claim of ownership, but its not. Why? Becuase in one point of time in our case the first half of 20th century certain group of people aka german national socialists, and lets face it majority of german population in those times decided who is worth of living and who is not. Your grandfather Hans, a war criminal flees to Latin America with substantial wealth stolen from jewish families ( not only jewish, everyone who they marked as non-arian ) , uncluding my family, somehow marries an american or canadian woman. Story continues.........2014 young John ( Hans grandson ) is driving his silver metallic porsche ( not due to his intelect, entrepreneurship, or a specific skill, but because of family;s fortune ) to a Snoop Doggs birthday party, on the other hand you have Jacob a warehouse worker in Poland intelligent, ambitious, but without a real oportunity ), he is earning enough to pay rent and food. Tell me please, do you consider this hypotetical situation to be normal ( not because of the money ), or Jacob has to find a way to reclaim what is his by right? The problem is that we have to pay for everything, since we are living in this sick world, why would I be a squirrel surrounded by wolves, if if he ( Jacob ) had at least a bit of brain he has to react like a wolf. If we would live in a world where the relations both social and economical would be as Jacob see it, then there is absoulutely no need for inheritance. By inheritance I consider enourmous accumulation of money and wealth. If a person is going to inherit a family house, fathers workshop, or a small piece of land thats absoulutely ok for me.
  12. super.bueno
    It really is hypocrisy when you are explaining it like that. You ve written and I quote: If the victim of the crime is dead, and the perpetrator of the crime is dead, how exactly can justice be done? I am not going to find you, not because of the wealth which was supposed to be transferred to me, but because your whole freaking family for couple of generations was living fat from a great theft and human tragedy. Since I cannot prove my justice, and since I have my human pride, and as I ve already told you there is no law institution ( domestic or international ) that would stand on my side.
  13. super.bueno
    If I am against inheriitance, that doesnt mean my grandfather was. There is no you, and there is no me in that example, a made up story Its all good troll cheiftain, its all good.
  14. super.bueno
    Tell this to Germans, they are still pating for the sins of their grandfathers You re joking right...well my egocentric capitalist friend let me put it this way...hmmm if I knew for example that your grandfather as German killed my grandfather as a Jew , then fled to Chile or Argentina where he had lived and hided wealth stolen from Jewish families all around Europe. If I know that you inherited indirectly that wealth from your nazi grandfather and you are living your idiotic life with 3 cars you know 10000000000000000 sq/m house, a helicopter, you name it and I am living in a small apartment in Poland for example, barely surving and trembling whether I am going to pay my bils next month, I would find you, and absolutely nothing would save you. You are not voluntarily going to give back what is mine, and what my ancestors had built and saved for centuries, and there is no court or official institution that would stand on my side they would all say the same thing like you just did. Violence as you see, is unfortunately needed, because no man or woman with a crumb of dignity would stand this injustuce. I ve told this to couple of peope here, and now I am telling to you now. Think before you write, dont just repeat cheap phrases over and over.
  15. super.bueno
    Its my style of discussion, take it or leave it. Nothing here is personal, think a bit before you write. We are all under pseudonyms here, it is what makes it safe, warm and free. You are so smart, you are my idol.
  16. super.bueno
    1. Because there is too much injustice, crime and poverty in this world, and I dont know ...somehow it just doesnt feel right. 2. No comment, everything is clear here 3. Its clear that you are a normal guy with a strong working ethic. I think you are right. About 2+2, I dont know they told us its 4. It could be true though. Its all good sunshine. If someone doesnt accept something, so I do dont have to accept his/hers either. This is why this is called a forum ( exchange of thoughts ).
  17. super.bueno
    Is it really that hard for you to understand that you are not the center of the universe? I know, what you think, why the fuck would I pay for making someone else happy? Is that right Mr Chapman? Mr Chapman I know that you are no kind of libertarian, you just want to be at the same fucking place as Mr Rockefeller or Mr Rothschild. You dont give a fuck, how people live all over the globe as long as you maintain your consumer standards. 25 sq/meters your personal space is nothing + 25 sq/m for your wife + 25 sq/m for your child+ 25 sq/m for your second child + bathroom+kitchen+garage space+hobby room + a decent job+ a decent car, thats the answer to your question.
  18. super.bueno
    Normative multiculturalism, or strong multiculturalism, born in the 1970s and further developed over the 1980s, is rooted in a rigid conception of cultures as objective, immutable, and reified. This perspective freezes differences and imprisons its members within rigid collective identities. It assumes that cultures can be univocally defined and its members have identical forms of belonging within them; such multiculturalism has been used by conservatives to highlight a civilization clash and to emphasize the need to protect national cultures from a dangerous tainting caused by incoming migrant cultures. In the public sphere, this multiculturalism entails concessions, grants, and privileges to safeguard minority cultures in various sectors (health, religion, welfare, political representation, etc.), and to protect traditional languages, religious habits and customs. It is an institutional multiculturalism, requiring political initiative based on a cultural interpretation of the public sphere. However, what is important to remember is that what is happening now is a most serious backlash to multiculturalism in the European Union, and if one were to consider some of the most strident cases of anti-multicultural public policies -- such as Arizona's anti-immigrant law -- then the same can be said about the United States. Multiculturalism is the struggle to incorporate diversity that emerged as a response to conflicts within 20th century inter-group relations and addressed the challenges of integration. It is fully ingrained in the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, as well as the New Civil Right Movement of the 21st Century.
  19. super.bueno
    1. Super.bueno, if you believe in the value of making it on your own and not taking any handouts why do you care if other people get them? Yes I strongly believe in that, and I ve proven more than once. 2. There's certainly ample evidence of fame and fortune wrecking people's lives. Legitimately rich people don't bother me at all, but for those who use the State to get rich I would share your contempt. Absolutely right, I have no counter argument. Let me ask you something, how many rich or super rich made it by their own without help of the government ( in percentages please ) 3. If my dad owned a business and turned it over to me after he died am I supposed to burn it to the ground and start over? Absolutely not, desision is all yours. But what if your dad was a professional killer or a mobster? Pardon me, is this an irony or these are true arguments?
  20. super.bueno
    Which is the biggest one then?
  21. super.bueno
    There are thinkers not that many though, but they are just too afraid to speak up and act, so they have to conform with all sorts of fascists lead by various European governments.
  22. super.bueno
    ,, life platform '' represents a world in which where is no homeless, where is no hunger, where is no banksters ( banking activity is not bad as such, but the existing model is softly spoken anti-common sense ) , where we all take care about nature and natural resources, where work is not slavery but joy and pleasure, where there is no such thing as school or public schooling as we know it, but more like ancient greek agoras ( life schools ) , where agresiveness is reduced to a minimum, where logic, sprituality, respect and cooperation rule ( and no its not utopia ) ...peace, love, stability, real education, real medicine, happy, free and careless people all over the place. This can be achieved easily between free people with their free will in a government free society.
  23. super.bueno
    There is a great difference between what we ( you ) call shy in different European countries. Europe as a continet spreads from the Ural and Caucasus mountains in the East to Portugal in the west, and from Norway in the north to I guess Sicily in the south. As you probably know the second name for Europe is ,, The old continent '' , so it remained old, conservative aristocratic, and imperialistic. When it comes to the so called New World which are todays modern countries such as USA, CAN , AUS, NZ, they had had time and opportunity to develop in more liberal manner in comparison with their European counterparts predominantly Great Britain and France, and of course Spain and Portugal when it comes to Latin America. I dont believe in an institution of nationality. I was born in a European country, which now I find absolutely bizzare, cinic, fradulent, primitive conservative ( political, religious, economic, life perspectives ) so I decided not to call it my home or my country any more. Romans used to say ubi bene ibi patria - which means Where I am at ease, there is (my) country. You have all the right to search and persue your happiness, whereever its located. ,,My Name is Tim, 26 years old, from Holland. I grew up with no brothers/sisters with my parents. They split up when I was 2 or 3 years old. My mother, single-home, fairly socialist, spanked me regularly with wooden spoons, sticks etc. from the age of 3 until the age of 11. She became a Christian from when I was 10 or 11, which I still blame myself for, because we were one of the few people in my mother's side of the family who weren't. I sort of pondered to her why we couldn't go to church? My dad was emotionally pretty distant. He wasn't around from age 2 until age 4. Later on we still weren't close when it came to reallife human things like sex, music, culture whatever. But we both had the same sense of humor, political views (age 14) conservative and both liked practicality. And my dad never spanked me. He could get confrontational but rarely any yelling. '' You want to say that your conservative father is somehow more understandable than your ex-socialist mother. Its like you re choosing between -165 and -168, and you ve chosen -165 cause its more positive and closer to zero. I know this feeling In which country of Eastern Europe have you lived, and for how long if its not too personal? Unfortunately its true what you are saying, in each and every European society ( country ) according to my estimations there is not more than 1-3% of libertarian, free-thinking, truth seeking, aware, alternative population. Maybe even less, it can vary from country to country.
  24. super.bueno
    If you want to build a new healthy libertarian society from ground zero, then this is the thing that you absolutely have to do. In international law, the crime prosecution has no time limits. I dont want to offend anybody, but if your grand grand grand father was a white supremacist, who built up his wealth on slave labour , and passed it to you through I dont know 8 generations, them YES, there has to be the way for historical crime and unjustice to be settled. I have a feeling that majority of you, who have commented on this topic, and I guess you call yourselves libertarians or anarchysts is concerned only with deeper pocket and thicker wallet . My beloved material wealth and ultra consumerism. Big houses, expencive cars, blondes, small penises this is not libertarianism, this is sick, anti-human behaviour. What kind of comment is this: Who are you to access is 25 sq/meters enough for someones private space or not. You know for me there are certain boundaries and common sense what is enough and what is excessive. If you want to live alone in the empire state building,its ok you can do that, but for me you are a complete idiot. I agree 100% with this.
  25. super.bueno
    Abolutely true, just for the record what is your field of work? The only problem for a educational revolution to start is fear and constant brainwashing either from public or from parents, ( I dont blame them that much, cause they are victims of the victims, so are we )
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept