Jump to content

sue.g

Member
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

Everything posted by sue.g

  1. The rules •RULE 1: “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood. •RULE 2: “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone. •RULE 3: “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. •RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. •RULE 5: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. •RULE 6: “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. •RULE 7: “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. •RULE 8: “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. •RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. •RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. •RULE 11: “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem. •RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions True! The video actually has some of the recipe!!! Just now i know about the existence of that book, thank you mike!
  2. Well, i just got across this in Last Week Tonight with John Olivier. Is not surprising at all, but still is funny how you can spend almost 4 minutes talking BS. Of course, when someone says "dont", curiosity wins. Nevermind, some videos can only be called propaganda, i almost can see the bag of money from the gov in the hands of HBO.
  3. This is so true, it was an "open eyes" moment. Thank you so much Stefan, for your honesty, i dont know where else i could get this true. Hugs, Sue.
  4. @Thomas K Then, you think that Lars von Trier created so crappy and disgusting characters on purpose and faking that he likes them... o maybe he thinks that he likes them, but in deep, he hates them... i just watched the interview where he said he understands hittler It is painfull. In Nynphomaniac, he is obviously proyecting his neglecting mother in the main female character. @Wuzzums I liked a lot! I have already subscribed! Is your channel?
  5. Well, i dont know if anyone already saw this movie, and i do not want to spoiler it if someone still want to watch it after reading my opinion. I am not particulary interested on the photography, rythm, or other production values. The story on the other hand, wasnt what I expected. If I could describe it in one word, this would be "disgusting", and this is the interesting part, because 2 years ago, I wouldn´t notice why, and of course, i would be numb about the messages that Lars von Trier is sending to the audience. But this is not only happening with movies. This is happening with everything in my life. Suddenly appears clear to me, the behavior of the people, the way they use violence in their daily basis not even knowing why. Is like a sickness, that is invisible to apparently for everyone, or, at least, the majority of people. There is a lot of sex on the movie, but the movie is not sexy at all. It was like watching someone eat crap with a very happy mood, the crap is crap, and i dont mind if a fly liked, i dont want to eat it. The sad part, is that Lars von Trier believes that this crap "taste good". Because he is showing this woman like something that people want, or find "sexy". And when I think of this, i understand that it is me, that for once notice that this shit is not sexy at all. If you want to check how much you still see crappy people as sexy, i really recommend Nymphomaniac as an exercise. If you think your time is precious and do not want to wasted watching a really disgusting movie, stay away from this piece of shit. What do you think? Someone already saw this movie?
  6. Hello, im Sue, Im from a little city of Mexico, and Im very happy to be here. Just wanted to introduce myself, and say thank you to all, thank you Stef and Mike for all the hard work wow.... I feel so shy... I dont kow what else to say! Hugs to all!!!
      • 2
      • Upvote
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.