Will Torbald

It's funny how you would want to escape to a muslim country if Trump is sabotaged. Kinda defeats the point.

I'm fine with this. I find the desire for justice to be psychologically corrosive. I think prisons are not meant for punishment, but about keeping dangerous people outside of society - but I don't care if that means justice or not.

So what? I actually want the mugger to go away. Closing my eyes doesn't make the world disappear. Knowing that the state is deontologically immoral won't make it go away. If every civilian in the US or any other country thought the same, the state would still be there. It is a body of people really willing to use force against you. It is not an abstraction in people's minds when they have tanks and missiles aimed at you.

The universe could also be unfolding instead of causing itself. Like say, you see a man kicking a ball. You think that the ball was launched because the man kicked it. But in an unfolding universe, the ball was sent off flying just as a man was kicking. The event was going to happen, not by causes, but as if it were a movie where props were placed in a scene. That's something that isn't neither random nor caused.

You can't just yell "Ad Hominem!" after calling me a True Tyrant, but I won't say dwell on that. But no, you're not correct about there not being a road. All transformations have a path that must be travelled. If I declare the state to be illegitimate, it doesn't go away. If I decided I hated my wife, I would still be married - divorce is a long procedure. Desmantling the state is also a long procedure. Ancapistan is an incredibly unpopular idea, and no one will take to it kindly, not even minarchists. The transition from monarchy to republic had war and upheaval. All socio-political transformations have "a road". And while voting for less government doesn't turn people into anarchists, it increases the confidence in the private sector. And you need full 100% confidence in private enterprise if you want to have a society of full 100% private services. Anything that increases that confidence is "the road".

I'd appreciate a rebuttal of the explanations put forth in the section you cut off from my post. Maybe it went over your head, or they were so advanced that they seemed unintelligible to you?

Even if voting were immoral, the road to a moral society need not be moral itself - only effective. If the road to a moral/free society could be 100% ethical then we'd already be in a moral society, thus being paradoxical. The idea that the road to a better place must contain the qualities of the better place will only result in paralysis.

I mean, I'm sure it's a great read, but it's not like you can't summarize it in one or two sentences. No such thing exists in the West currently in practice. Maybe I exagerate a little, but all of Europe is a surveillance state, and in US the social justice mob takes care of you. This is unintelligible. 1- Very idealistic. It's only gotten worse, never better, never freer, at least with the US. In Europe it's full cultural suicide. 2- Still a where, not a when. People idealize their preferred time period. Some prefer the 80's (new retro wave movements) others the 50's, and others the 1776'.

I agree with the ideals of your article as well. A lot of people also claim that the west is the best, or the pinnacle, but I also disagree that it is the best we can do. Whenever something is elevated to the position of the best, all progress is stunted. Humanity can do much better than the west in the long run, but it will never do it unless it stops contemplating itself as if it were the last thing it can achieve. Yet people are the unhappiest they've ever been if you substract the anti-depressants, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, suicide rate, self hatred/white guilt/race tensions, - I mean, if you were to treat western countries as one personified entity, it is a self harming depressed mess of a gender fluid guy. The negative aspects cannot be overseen. This would sum up West Civ as "What White People Do". Since western culture has been at one point in history hard left, hard right, liberal, socialist, capitalist, and everything in between - the only thread is white people. Save the west is code for save the white race.

Forget your true self. Your inner animal is what is troubling you. The man sits on top of the tamed beast that lies within him. You're a teenager with still years before reaching brain maturity. What about sex? It seems very unsatisfied. What about hunting? Do you know what it takes to live off the death of others? Have you ever gotten into a fist fight? When your reason and your emotions go haywire, it's the instincts beneath them that are in turmoil.

We did it. We saved Western Civilization. I think? I've been reading a lot from many different groups, and they all want to Save The West. I guess we agree on where it is, but not when it is. Everyone has their opinion about it, and the problem I see is that "West Civ" is undefined, which causes many debates and discussions on what it is actually about. Is it an egalitarian society? Is it about equality of gender, of race? Of civil rights? Or the one about private property and discrimination? Does it include the empire, or the democracy? Is it secular or christian? Is it liberal or conservative? All of the above? The point is that whatever it is that you or we are trying to save, no one is willing to actually define it concretely. It's in Europe and in America aka The West. But when?

Think about all the times you've prayed for help, but didn't get help. The one time you do find yourself with aid from someone, you think god exists. The other 99 times he didn't exist? Like when a dream comes true, but the other 99 dreams never did. If you keep asking for help, consistently like christians do, eventually you are going to be helped by simple statistical action. Ask person P how many times he was "denied" help against the one time it seemed like he had been heard. If Superguy exists, he's very petty or selfish when it comes to decide when he helps you out or not, isn't it? For example, if I had had that experience, my assumption would have been a psychic phenomena like I said earlier. I would have also considered if I hadn't already met these people before but forgot consciously yet remembered subconsciously. I would also consider having created false memories after the fact - my mind created a false memory that a sound I heard earlier was the voice of god telling me to help someone, but was actually a person speaking something nearby and I misheard. False, retroactive, history revisioning memories are actually common and known to happen to people who study psychology. Most people have a ton of accumulated false memories.

Assuming the anecdote is completely accurate, not lying, and perfectly true, I would rather deduct that person A is a psychic than God existing and whispering in her ear about a stranger. When seemingly paranormal activity occurs, there's a bias to assume there is a God doing it. Why not any other kind of extra-ordinary explanation?

A tax is something you pay if you make money. If you're unemployed, you're don't have to pay income taxes since you have no income. What are they going to tax you specifically for? You're saying the government expects money from you even if you don't work, which doesn't actually happen.

The only thing that can defeat the Jewish in-group preference strategy is for the host population, in this case Hwhites, to also become in group strategists - and with the greater numbers win by default. This is why many libertarian thinkers have been jewish - since they promote individualism and universalism (and economies that benefit jewish banking) not to mention diversity and third worldism. So you lose as long as you don't step up your game. The same Israelis who deny refugees in Israel are welcoming boats on the shores of Europe because that's what is good for them. If it were explained only by a slight IQ difference, then the difference in media and academia would only be by a few percentages as well, but it's overblown. That is only explained by their in group nepotism, nothing else.

The alt-right is in tune with ideas of tradition, skepticism of democracy and equality, hierarchy as a good thing, and doesn't condemn authority as inherently wrong or illegitimate. If that isn't right wing, you tell me then.

Not an answer. Lots of virtue signaling.

A racist judges individual people for their ethnicity. A racialist judges races based on their stats. If I see a black person, I don't know how smart he is. If I see a group of a thousand black people, I can probably predict their average IQ and income within 2% margin of error.

Yeah, I read the book too. It is however, totally mistaken. First of all, I was talking about a scenario where the current border of the current society would be privatized - say, the US border with Mexico. Build a wall and it isn't illusory. Second, a society without commons where no one can step outside without permission of someone else will never work, implodes, and would be a nightmare to live in. Quality of life matters, and not being able to have common spaces is the worst idea ever. Finally, you ignore fanaticism and imperialism. People conquer because their god tells them to, or their egomaniac ruler tells them too. A free society is fresh meat for savages, barbarians, islamists, and tyrants. Whether you like it or not.

Extort border owners, kidnap their families, bribe them, buy them outright and then open it for your interests.

The tinfoil in me is telling me that the same people behind the immigration are the same people behind the terror are the same people behind the government. They can issue recommendations because they know what's going to happen because they are the ones making it happen. It's happening.

Yeah, that whole Stormfront Neo Nazi thing is what Ramzpaul would call Jewish Controlled Opposition as most if not all of the neo nazi propaganda has been funded and promoted by jews themselves in order to have a strawman to fall back on every time someone notices coincidences. I wouldn't say he disagrees that whites are disadvantaged, and that he'd be fine with white advocacy - he's just not a cartoon character. Stefan does appeal to whites, but at the same time still holds libertarian policies where countries have no governments or border control and thinks that the free market will figure everything out. Ramz used to be libertarian, but went through the red pill and "the dark enlightenment" - he gave a speech on that which I also recommend.

You need to watch Ramzpaul. Look him up on youtube and his video "The morality of European survival". Personally, I don't think Stef's approach is going to help you through your angst since he's still very universalist and not directed at white people. You need a stronger dose of red pilling.

I don't know if it's downstream from economics. Culture affects politics affects economics affects culture - but that's a feedback loop. It always begins with culture.

Good content. I bailed abround 30 minutes in because I found Harris to be mentally and physically painful to listen.