Together-Whenever-Wherever

Before I dive into your questions, I think we can all agree that allowing Muslim immigration was and is a mistake. Once these people are in your country, they are in your country. If you want to get them out, the only way to do so is through deportation. Deportation is the wisest answer, but it's not on the table for any Western European country at the moment so we can assume the millions of migrants are here to stay for awhile. As a general rule, seeing people clearly for who they are is preferable to not. And since they're here to stay for the foreseeable future, knowing what you are up against is preferable to not. For example, if some bullies are planning to kick my ass after school, I'd much rather prefer they announce their intentions instead of keeping it a secret. With the former, I at least have a chance to evade them. With the latter, I'm just going to be jumped and pummeled while I walk home. By suppressing the flag you do not make the problem go away, you're only making it go underground where it's less visible to non-Muslims and in this sense more dangerous. Your question: "Aren't their true colors patent?" Well, no, they're not. They are to you. They are to me. But they're not to everybody, or else we would be addressing the problem. And to your last question: They are already out in the streets marching. Imagine if instead of Turkey's flag those were ISIS flags. Wouldn't that send a stronger signal to Europeans about the danger they're in?

I remember in an old podcast Stefan saying something like "The best thing corrupt people have to offer is the shining example of what not to be." I think this is also true of countries. Legalize the ISIS flag, good, do not censor them, do not give them the victim card to play. In future pro-Muslim marches in Sweden we'll see the ISIS flags flying above the heads of the masses, and we'll see their true colors.

Woman Suffrage was an enormous mistake and indeed an enormous Pandora's Box exploding moment. This has nothing to do with equality under the law, and everything to do with the nature of male and female/man and wife priorities. It's interesting to go back and read the Anti-Suffragist literature of the late 19th/early 20th centuries, it's like hearing the wise words of a ghost from a different time. You never hear their voices mentioned in today's world, but there were many of them. And many of their predictions about the breakdown of the family through the eschewing of traditional roles, the degradation of morals and the female character were spot on, etc. They even had evidence to draw from at the time from states like Colorado, which had legalized the female vote before the rest of the US by more than two decades, and from which crime and poverty was already recorded to be escalating.

You can be the anxious, frightened boy who plugs into the Internet like streams find a river, or you can be the over-compensating male who puffs his chest out like a spring-chicken. This is high school. This is the training ground for your future. And in preparation for the brave new world it slams you upside the head with left or right. It's only after you've graduated high school and failed enough that you are pressed into a corner and find the middle. Rationality, evidence, analysis. When your starred and hazy eyes finally get to see some clarity and reclaim your manhood. Twenty years of life abused, and we now must scratch and grab our way towards something better. Man. This world sometimes.

LOL

Mr. Robot hacking scene CSI hacking scene

Agreed. I watched the first few episodes and I appreciated their treatment of hacking. As someone who is a programmer (I haven't dabbled in hacking personally, but I know enough of the basics) it's nice to hear stuff that actually makes sense, and isn't just programming jargon thrown together in gibberish sentences. The show isn't engaging enough to keep me watching, though, to be fair, there's only been a handful of shows in the past ten years I've watched for an entire season. TV drama aka melodrama is hard for me to stomach.

INTERESTING that you asked this on August 16, because on August 15, just the day before, a website called Gab debuted. It's billed as the free-speech alternative to authoritarian minded sites like Twitter. It's becoming a haven for members of the Alt-Right fleeing the draconian censors of big social media. I heard about Gab through Alt-Right personalities like Mike Cernovich and Alex Jones. There's a waiting list at the moment, because the response was bigger than the creators expected so it might take some time before you can create an account. https://gab.ai/