Erwin

I did address your comment. My "normie" statement was literally the last sentence, and was a valid question at that. Before that, I cited a source, made a couple arguments, etc. Anyways, no biggie. Is this an argument against the JQ? Cuz I don't disagree with it, and I think JQ and your argument can be true at the same time.

Not trolling, but it's very tempting. When I spot someone as emotionally frail as you, I feel like a shark who smells blood.

Just good 'ole riffing for added humour. Heck, I call myself an assh*le all the time lol

"Normie" is neither shaming, nor argumentation.

I'm not trying to change anything. I am what I am, and it works for me. Either you swallow your pride and do what works, or have fun with your dead forum. All I smell is a hero complex. And it's very useful here, as a demonstration of how this forum is dying.

Oh, thank you for telling me why I do things. Very informative. Oh, stop it with the hero complex already. You want a medal for standing up to an "abusive bully"? I would very much prefer to isolate myself from weaklings, in favor of strong-minded people who will riff back. Sheeple upvote sheeple. In the end, the trend is that this forum is losing members, because of this feminine high brow attitude. High rep in a dead forum, is no rep at all. We keep this up, and we'll get the same results. If we want to buck this trend, we need to purge the estrogen from this forum. And we don't need the admins for this, all we need is 2 things: - purge estrogen from our own character - shame estrogenic users

This womanly attitude is a prefect example of what makes women support goat-fkers coming into our countries, because at least rapists have a pair. I think riffing is funny at all times, and always a fantastic debating tool to either get to the crux of an issue and butt heads where it's needed, or to cut the debate short if the person is too gay to do so.

"name-calling" is a word that liberals and women (but I repeat myself) use as a means to avoid being held to standards. Quite gay indeed. What we are doing is called "riffing" and a natural part of non-sperg male banter, and a quick way to weed out the women from the conversation. Epic strawman. ROFL. I never claimed that they are sinister conspirators, or that such a trait is genetic. I claimed that they are a problem. As for why, @Eudaimonic made a compelling case (I won't reiterate for brevity but read his posts above), but I would add this: sure, every group can have bad apples, but when a pattern exists in disproportionate amounts, I won't ignore it because some Jew calls me a Nazi or anti-semite. That's about as faggy as ignoring crime stats by race because a dindu might call you a racist. Ew.

Actually, a recent study showed journalists have a lower IQ than average. And banking doesn't require genius verbal skills. So... that leaves us with their genetic predisposition of in-group preference and subversion (and boy, can I list obvious examples). Why are you normies so comfortable with noticing positive racial patterns, but very resistant towards anything negative?

Nope. Any Alt Righters who like Stefan enough to be on this forum are the exceptions. The rest of us are "meh.... not bad". That might change if he addresses the Jewish problem.... but hey one can hope. I know. We're busy doing the street work that everyone else is too cucked to do. But we do have discussion on forums, though. Just not here. That's called shitposting. It's meant to trigger shitlibs and cuckservatives by dropping exaggerated truth bombs. I don't know where you got the idea that people are just dying to sperg with strangers. The Jews Shoah'd us off their platform, so we have independent platforms now.

Great blog post. 50-75% is the average. It doesn't take into account variation of their racial groups. For example, the average IQ of all humans is 100, but when you break it down by race, quite a different story. So if you're targeting the actual Spaniards (Jorge Ramos?) in Latin America as a candidate for immigration then I'd agree with you.

As for the price range of therapy, there are 2nd-best options out there, like group sessions. Since many attend, the therapist gets to lower the fee by a lot. You won't get a diagnosis from a therapist (they're not allowed to), but you'll still be able to work on whatever issue you're having. As for "fixing" you, that sounds like some kind of life coach thing. Nowadays, what therapists usually do is called Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), and a big part of it is to not force solutions on you. Instead, the goal is to get you to determine if something is an issue and to help you come to your own solutions.

Good to know about mental health issues, but I think the internet is a horrible way to know for sure if you have any issues. For a diagnosis, you need a doctoral level psychologist. Have you considered that?

How do you know you have no mental health issues? Have you consulted a psychologist? Also note: The DSM requirement for a personality trait to be diagnosed as a mental health issue is that it is so maladaptive, it interferes with at least one area of your life (i.e. social, romantic, or professional). So you may have maladaptive traits, but you keep them in check. Personal example, being exposed to Stefan made me realize I had a lack of empathy. Ever since, I personally will myself into considering the incentives and goals of the people I deal with, in every situation. I have benefited in doing this in 2 ways: 1) Increased social cohesion / attachment with those who share my values 2) I have become quick to recognize those who do not share my values, and quick to cut those ties

I don't see why Spaniards can't integrate, at least in North America... But latinos? no way.

Who made you the FBI? Stop sperging bro, it's just anecdote.

This article seems pretty good, having glossed over it. I'll give it a more in-depth read during the weekend but, from an overview I did notice it mention that initially it took 350 years to form a noticeable Christian minority (by noticeable, as in they were persecuting pagans). And then, Julian became emperor and formally enacted anti-pagan laws such as the death penalty for pagan rituals. So... that does help convert people lol I'm afraid my memory isn't the problem, but rather my age. In 2006, I was 11-12yo. In 1993, I did not exist.

Bahaha what am I, a woman?!

You're IQ is much higher than your average dindu, for example (70 in Africa which is medically retarded). If you create half-dindus with them, the offspring will have higher IQs than the dindu average, and thus gives them a competitive advantage in making a living. In essence, you can use your seed to alleviate world poverty, raise world IQ, continue our bloodline, and hopefully as the world whitens they will be less hostile towards Europeans. You are by no means, useless my friend. You can do a lot of good in this world.

No I'm not trolling at all. If you'd like me to elaborate on something, I'd be happy to.

As I mentioned before, I clarified that I was not implying that behavior cannot be overridden. What I'm arguing is that - more often than not - ideology is either chosen to justify pre-existing behaviors or imposed by force. If you look at communism, for example, most leftists cannot even answer basic questions about what they claim to believe in. They were already sold at Muh-Gib-me-datz. Can't say for sure, as I don't know each individual history but I know that - in many of the cases you mentioned - Christianization did follow a Christian settlement and procreation, thus creating more Israelites. Germanics fell to Roman rule, many migrated to Britannia post-invasion, eventually mixed with Britons, who in turn mixed with various Celts. The Mongolians were already of Scythian descent, and have become mongolized by banging chinos. Polynesians and Subsaharans did have European settlers as well. At this point, I'm just speculating but I think Paganism fell as it has no bloodline implications, unlike Buddhism (Kechimyaku) and Hinduism (Vrishni). You can give up ideas at little to no cost, but to give up an entire heritage just like that? I don't think so. I'm afraid I completely lost you here. What civil war are you referring to? Since when haven't we been voting left? How has the left messed up?

I don't actually think the trajectory is unchanged. I think that we may very well have some of our ethnicities mostly wiped out. I think the most likely scenario is that the first countries to go down, namely Germany, France, Holland, Belgium and Sweden will have their survivors escape to what remains of white countries, and thus, increasing the white population in those countries. Also, it is very likely that they will be so furious and blood thirsty (having survived a genocide, and all) that they will vote for whichever party is the closest thing to a right-wing death squad. then how do you know you're overriding a genetic predisposition? Don't you think it is more likely that you're simply rationalizing your pre-existing behavior with ideology? It was actually a slow process, but in any case I think it was because of the Israelite migration to Sparta, and subsequently Rome. If you actually track the lineage of Abraham's children, you'll see that the blessing of God was never passed down to the descendants of Judah (Jews), but rather to the descendants of Israel (Israelites). As the prophecy goes, the blessed peoples will settle all over the world. If memory serves me right, Judah was actually cursed. There is a famous passage in the Bible where Jesus is waiting for the "gentiles" (aka Hellens), and when they finally arrive, he says "The time has come". Why was that so significant? Because they were the ones who continued Israel's bloodline, and so he may finally continue with his mission and return to God. Another thing that many people don't know is that there was a (Israelite) Spartan immigration to Rome prior to the empire (hence, Book of Romans). So is it that surprising that a group of people would embrace an ideology that claims they were the chosen people? Oh? When was the last time you searched for lesbian cuckery? Pretty sure never. Because unless you are given a reason to investigate something you don't, and reasonably so as you would otherwise be doing nothing but internet surfing. Combine that with the fact that libs live in a reality bubble. Of course, you end up with this predicament. I think you underestimate the opposition... I do agree that we are at the moment a net negative, but the trend is absolutely on our side if you look at the momentum of the Alt Right. Very true, Christianity is really the only ideology that crossed those lines. And you're right about the map, I should've been more thorough. Why is Hungarian descent relevant? As for the Jew debate, perhaps another time. I don't find it productive to engage in too many debates at a time.

I was referring to topics that can get him in trouble for speaking it (i.e. too taboo). I don't mean anything unethical.