Erwin

I don't know what the solution is yet, but I'm actually exploring for NAP-compliant solutions. If I come to a falsifiable conclusion, then I'll definitely post my theory / evidence.

The goyim never bought public education and public media, which present pornography as a norm to young teenagers and if you disagree you're a white judgmental deplorable bigot. So of course, when you are raised by the government from young age - as most people are - which cucks its own people to the ((( Jews ))), then of course you will be cultureless. You will see nothing wrong with pornography if its been normalized the whole time. Monolothic... like... say... education, media, banks, Jewish state, porn, and the greatest lie ever told known as Hitler?

(One of) the premises to your argument is the validity of Muh-Constitution, which I completely reject. Muh-Constitution is at the end of the day, just paper. If your society is founded on merely paper, then your society is on very shaky grounds. It is no surprise that Muh-Constitution has failed to achieve almost all of its intended purposes. Sooner or later, the biological realities of r/k selection, race, and IQ will take their course. Among all k-selected races, pornography had - up until 30 years ago - been seen as immoral as it is a close substitute for actual sex, which allows men sexual gratification without having to pay a woman with commitment, resources, kids, etc. When we let Muh-Constitution dictate our norms, foreign norms can potentially become normalized. There is only one group of people whose survival relies on the degeneracy of whites by normalizing behaviors that are seen as immoral, and that is the ((( Jews ))). Incidentally, ((( they ))) are the only group of people who openly take pride in controlling the porn industry. The solution to the Jewish problem is the solution to porn, as we would return to ostracizing porn consumption.

Can you rebut my argument then?

Subjective theory of value: "value is determined by the importance an acting individual places on a good for the achievement of his desired ends." He can't possibly agree with it because he doesn't define value in the same way that economics defines it. His definition: STV completely explains why diamonds are more valuable than water. His definition of value, completely fails on that end. Also, his theory value - that taxing something gives it "value" (usefulness) further fails because taxing water would not make it more useful.

Are you saying that because they were at war, they were warmongers and therefore a military culture like Sparta? If this is your argument then I say one does not follow the other, and the premise is wrong to begin with. The were not warmongers. The war was initially with ((( USSR ))), which as a ((( globalist ))) ideology was a very credible threat. The german invasion of Poland was also not the trigger of WWII as ((( they ))) like to say. Poland happened because German intel informed Hitler that Stalin was going to invade Poland, which was a buffer state for Germany. Hitler decided that he had to invade the USSR, not Poland. When the question of how to start the invasion came, the plan was to have Hitler speak with Stalin, split Poland between the two evenly. When the invasion started, Hitler just kept going. And that's just the eastern front. They did not start the western front; England did started it, through the real warmonger ((( Hertzl ))) - future founder of ((( Israel ))) - who owned Churchill like a puppy. Nazis also did not start the war on ((( Jews ))); ((( Judea ))) declared war on Germany in 1933. They were not a military culture. In sparta, all aspect of life was quite literally designed by the Spartan King for the sole purpose of advancing the military capability of Sparta. This was not the case at all in Germany. The Germans had their military service, but every country had that. Once it was over, you could proceed to get a job, start a family, etc, just like every other white country. Perfect example, if Hitler wanted a military culture, he would not have bothered annexing Austria or the Suderland. The sole purpose of those annexations were to increase the supply of land, as housing was increasingly scarce in Germany at the time. This goes against the interests of the German military. More land simply spreads your military thin. European norms Replacing: with the exact opposite, is a regression to Sparta? I don't see how it's a regression, nor do I see how Sparta was a ((( Jew ))) culture. The eastern war was a fight with the ((( Soviets ))). Perfectly reasonable, if you ask me. The western war was really a proxy war, since the ((( they ))) didn't have a military on the western front. The "Allies" were technically ((( Allies ))). Hitler's struggle was never with Europeans. It was with ((( Jews ))).

I'm trying to get rid of the image in my signature because it's way too big. I keep deleting it, but it keeps popping back. Help plz?

ignore this post, cant delete

((( Communism ))) was a ((( Jewish ))) import. The Nazis were a reaction to ((( Jewish ))) influence. Yes. They were burning ((( books ))), they closed down the ((( press ))) and ((( media ))). All the things that the ((( Jews ))) were glorifying in the Weimar, such as ((( faggotry, lesbianism, polyamory, cuckolding, and promiscuity ))) was replaced with traditional European norms under the Nazis. I think this is pretty good! The universities weren't just "bad". They were ((( fraudulent ))). One famous case is known as ((( Einstein ))) who verbatim plagiarized (without even citing) the works of Hendrik Lorentz, James Maxwell, and Henri Poincare (the actual guy behind E = mc2). The Nazis restored the universities from their ((( fraud ))) status. I think this is pretty good too! Protecting your race and children is irrational? Then I'm irrational, and dang proud of it too. Oh you mean aside from Matrix algebra (Gauss), nuclear physics (Planck), quantum mechanics (Heisenberg), computer research (von Neumann), sound (Hertz), etc.? If you say so! They put an end to their genocide, and restored their culture and identity. This is irrational? I'm not sure if you're intentionally anti-white or just regurgitating ((( Jewish ))) propaganda.

I believe that your theory doesn't take into account reactionary behavior. The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior. The last time a country was in this predicament, it was Germany. Everyone predicted it would fall. Couples years of Hitler is all it took for real incomes to rise 10%, inflation to go down, and to tell the ((( banks ))) to f--- off. Imo, if Trump doesn't fix things, things will get worse, and people will get even angrier. Perhaps we will have our own Hitler.

According to onlygold, a gold / silver coin alloy was first coined by Lydian merchants. Gold was actively mined way before that (indicating that there was some use for it prior). Also according to wikipedia, earliest money I could find there was obsidian, in 15000BC in the hunter-gatherer (upper paleolithic) / pre-government era. Obsidian was used for hunting to make knives and spears. Again, prior use. I also remember from econ, that every society that grew rice or wheat couldn't avoid using it as money. Everyone intrinsically needs them, everyone can afford to have it in excess because it takes long for them to go bad, and everyone tended to slightly overproduce them just in case of a bad season. Tobacco, hemp, and cotton had been used way before their use as money as well. The last example of money I can think of is time dollars. Time has always been used for specific purposes, yet time banks, time markets, and time exchanges only sprung up in the last 300 years. 8th amendment permits congress to mint coin, the legal definition of which is that it must be metal (which at best, can only be de-based and not for long). It was legislated to paper from the bench in McCulloch vs Maryland (1819), and then to "credit" by the ((( Jews ))) in the ((( Federal Reserve Act ))).

Well... your logical reasoning is correct, but your conclusion is very unsettling because we keep having to remind ourselves that "oh... right... by value he means utility" Why use a different jargon than the convention? It just creates confusion and the need to explain more...

same goes for silver and platinum, plenty of industrial use

In addition to the functions of economic currency (unit of account + medium of exchange), and economic money (store of value)? Off the top of my head: - hedge against tail risk - gamma ray deflector - one of the best electrical conductors - makes steel more malleable - jewelry - dentistry

I didn't say it is relevant to the usefulness of money. I said it is relevant to having a conversation. I can't talk about something if I don't know what it is... That's why I was asking. Ok, based on this I think that our disagreement is simply semantics. What you have described is - in economics jargon - referred to as currency, hence my confusion. By that definition, I totally agree with you. I thought you were referring to the economics definition of money; fiat currency is - by definition - not money in econ jargon, but gold is. So, in my head, I thought we were arguing for the value of money like gold, and I was going to make the argument that "well, gold is useful but not taxed..." I guess that settles it?

Welcome to the wonderful world of... WIFE TRAINING Demand As quickly as possible (when socially appropriate obviously) demonstrate high value (aka DHV). DHV is not the same as bragging, but rather demonstrating your sexual status with indirect cues. How do you know if you have successfully DHV'd ? The Shit Test This is a stupid test women will do unintentionally and instinctively when they see sexual potential in you. They'll throw some kind of hurdle at you for no other purpose other than to see how you'll respond. So how should you respond? Put her in her place I like to be as arrogant / sarcastic with her as her shit test is with me. Real life example: - *water is right next to the girl, I'm 2 seats away* - Girl: "Can you pass me the water plz <3 xoxoxo thaank yoooouuuuuu" - Me (with a huge grin): "Can you pour me the water plz <3 xoxoxo thaank yoooouuuuuu" Supply Your most valuable commodity is attention. Treat it that way. Never ever ever give it for free. Women are biologically incapable of valuing something unless it costs them (which is why we used to keep them in the kitchen). If you don't put a price on attention, oh boy... she will want and want and want and want and then.... she will completely lose respect for you, and likely cheat on you. Example: - Girl: "Ohhh babyyyyy can you help me with my homework? pllzzzz thx <3 xoxoxo" - You: "It depends on your behavior" - Girl: "Ohhh babyyyy plzzzzz I'll make you a sammmich!" - You: "Meh..." - Girl: "oh oh and I'll clean your room! I swear!" - You: *grab her by the p-----* "Good girl" This is known as Pavlov's experiment (google it). Works great on women.

Funny how you don't mention the first part of your quote: Hence, "we aren't all anarchists". *proceeds to throw hissy-fit* Oh? I'm sorry princess, is my answer not to your standards? Your arrogance and sense of self-entitlement baffles me. *proceeds to whine about being trolled* You don't see how the NAP is relevant to anarchy? Or how the Alt Right is relevant to your question about this site being described as Alt Right? If you can't even connect those dots, I'll just have to baby you through it, which falls under the "life is too short" category for me. It's called a signature. Problem?

Except I did. See below. You: Me: And then you pms'd because I'm "saving face" and "deflecting your question" according to you. Let me assure you: 1) I have no desire to "save face" with you. 2) "I meant to say" is an overt acknowledgement of a poor choice of words, and implies that what follows is a correction of the previous statement. Considering that I have to explain basic social norms to you, I'm genuinely re-considering my initial assessment of you. Perhaps you're not a woman with no self-control, but rather a boy on the autism spectrum.

I gave you a very simple answer and now here we are. I have to wonder what your motivation is. If you didn't want an answer, why did you even ask in the first place?

Agreeing on the definition of value is very relevant. Now, I finally know what you are talking about and we can have completely different discussion. Using your definition of value: Premise: money has no utility unless it is taxed. Does your premise apply only to money or all things?

There we go. Troll-baiter confirmed. Next time, leave your emotions for your husband.

The answer is no, I mis-worded my answer, and it quickly became to complicated of a dialogue for you. Let me dumb it down for you, sweetheart. You asked for clarification. I clarified. Simple enough? Or perhaps, you're frustrated because you're tired of men explaining things you don't understand. Looks like you're still having a hard time... Sad! Typical projection. Look in the mirror, woman.

yup

Because there is such a thing as variability. For example, "We asians tend to be 5 feet tall. I happen to be 7 feet tall". The "We" is used to indicate that you are part of that group.

Or... you know.... Hitler. lol.