lorry

For sure, but I'm actually excited! Content creators are going to be placed into a position wherein their continued existence, or perhaps it is more accurate to say their continued success, will now be a function of their ability to activate their audience. So one outcome one might expect from this new process is that some content creators will acquire, or reveal, such skills. Some content creators are going to fail, sure, but their audiences can be cannibalized by this newer iteration of content creator. Moreover, this new iteration is yet more free to speak uncomfortable truths. Consider also the increased appeal of making this particular fruit yet more forbidden, the increased need for collaboration between content creators, the increased redundancy of finances and the drive to increase this yet more! Well, I'm excited! I don't think Google have quite thought this through.

Google, YES!

Preface to The Culture of Critique.

Say 80% of your child's genetic IQ is 142.5 from the parents and let the other 20% be random. In order for your child to have an IQ > 142.5 it would then have to roll > 142.5, pretty rare, right? If it is random then you would expect the roll to be about 100 (assuming your white). So your child's IQ would be expected to be 0.8 x 142.5 + 0.2 x 100, whatever that is. The important part of the idea here is that so long as the parents avg IQ is greater than the expected random IQ (the mean population IQ), ie. so long as the parents have an IQ > 100 then you would expect their child to have a lower IQ than them. Conversely, parents with an IQ < 100 would be expected to have child with an IQ higher than theirs. Plug in a few numbers and get a feel for whats going on. P x Avg_Parent_IQ + (1 - P) x Avg_Population_IQ = Child_Expected_IQ Where P is some number between 0 and 1 representing the percentage of your child's IQ which is a function of parents IQ.

Hail, Shanna.