Soldado De Aztlan

Colin Flaherty is an excellent source for the cover up of black mob violence.

Understanding how music is used to influence culture is essential. Psyops are a very real thing, and learning the methodology to defend yourself is essential.

If you don't know of Mike Adams then I suggest you follow him. He definitely does good work at exposing the corruption in the food, farming, and medical industries. However, this is a pretty serious claim he is putting out there.

Lol why is only desert people understand this simple lesson? Here is the perfect example from industrial agriculture. I've been watching the destruction of natural resources for years in this industry. Of course "western civilization & the free economy" increased the standard of living for billions. We couldn't be in a more dangerous position. People are either to ignorant, stupid, or corrupt to understand the danger. Less than 2% of the American population knows how to farm. Machines have made things "easier" to produce crops, but it's also magnified our mistakes. I work in this industry. I've met these ranchers. These people care only about one thing. Making money. These people have no idea what the consequences of their actions are. Of course free market capitalists think they're is a market solution to this? Being "intelligent" doesn't equate to morality, and it doesn't mean you're observant. It obviously doesn't equate to wisdom. This is the perfect example of people NOT THINKING. http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-08-08-climate-change-blamed-for-drying-of-great-plains-streams-but-its-actually-caused-by-groundwater-pumping-for-irrigation.html

They absorb the cost at a loss. Google has other departments that produce revenue. One of them is various contracts for the US government.

Joe Rogan is so pozed out. I don't know how people can listen to that ex junkie. My brother listens to him, and loves his show. He also is a liberal that just recently revealed his wannabe dictator ambitions. Maybe I'm to picky for wanting quality content over quantity. Filtering out bad information is a huge waste of time for me, and there is a ton of bad information on his show.

This is a good point. There have been plenty of things I've been exposed to, because of the suggested video catagory. However, shadow banning has become more of a thing also. Google's take over of YouTube has been a gradual slide to censorship. Im personally getting tired on online activism though, and just want to form groups. Been in the game for 9-8yrs now. Many of the things I warned about have come true, but I'm not exactly the beaming charismatic leader lol. So trying to find a mod of exposure for me is getting increasingly difficult. Just to note. If you aren't getting flake? You're not over the target. The closer you are the faster they hit you.

YouTube is already giving me problems, and I'm only a couple videos in lol. I guess a psycho/political analysis of their plans targeting Chicanos is a no no. Can't have one of the biggest minority groups getting red pilled now can we? Anyway, people have been moving away from YouTube for years. Full30 is the gun community's safe haven, because they kept getting shut down for years. Good website too. Gab looks like it's going to be a nitch market toward Alt Righters. Those damn autists keep driving everyone away. Although, there are some members working to diversifying the community. It doesn't help there is constant cyber attacks. Possibly from competition, or political opponents. My closing point is that if YouTube experiences an exodus then it could mean people enter their own echo chambers. Making it more difficult to reach different audiences. Which of course means certain groups will continue to be pawns, because of our inability to do outreach.

Ok first, you totally triggered my OCD with that link. The word suffer doesn't mean today what it did back then. Example: Timothy 3:12 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution. Many people nowadays interpret this passage as being enduring, or subjugated to persecution/pain. While the original meaning is "to allow." http://etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=Suffer Which completely changes the context of the passage. So an example is "I will not suffer it" translated as "I will not allow this (wrongdoing)." As a non-Christian with my views of Natural Law. When I look at Darwinism (despite its moral flaws) I see that nothing can be more perfect than seeking greater perfection. Stillness is death. If a body of water is still? It becomes stagnant, and things die within it. If it flows? Then it can bring life to many. Seeking greater perfection can can be seen in many aspects of life. If I am a painter. Do stop after I've learned to draw a circle? No. If I'm a martial artists. Do stop training to improve my technique? No. If I'm a builder. Do I stop finding better ways to construct a house? No. Also, standardized Christian responses disappoint me. Many of which is imposing the belief that perfection was back then. Instead of the here and now. Also this whole aversion to experiencing pain troubles me. How much sweeter is joy after experiencing sorrow? How much greater the feeling accomplishment after many tribulations? Without conflict there is no growth. Without the other opposing me there is nothing to overcome. What kind of life is that to avoid all hardship in search of paradise? I don't know and maybe I don't want to know. Ultimately this doesn't answer my curiosity on the serpent.

So I read the Bible occasionally, but never have finished it in its entirety. One thing that always throws a wrench in my gears is the Snake in the Garden of Eden. According to Christian ethos it's the manifestation of Satan who tempted Eve. Of course this is considered a great evil boon to humanity giving into the wiles of temptation. However, with my non-Christian upbringing. I always interpret it differently. First I will start with this part: Genesis 1:26 26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creepeth upon the earth. This is always explained to me as The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit. I don't really argue against this, but it just seems odd to refer to yourself in the plural sense. It's like claiming man has a Super Ego, Ego, and Subconscious self. Therefore a man must refer to himself in the plural sense. Moving on: Genesis 1:29-30 29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. 30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat; and it was so. So Adam and Eve appear to be vegetarians or fruigivors. This is before they eat the forbidden fruit. So I move to the next part of identifying this forbidden fruit as: Genesis 2:9 9 And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of good and evil. So there are two trees in the garden: Genesis 2:16-17 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat. 17 But the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. Well if that tree contains the knowledge of good, and evil?...Then how are they suppose to know that eating it is supposed to be bad. Of course it's explained to me as Adam, and Eve knew good without knowing evil. Because God said it was good...but this doesn't negate the fact they have no knowledge of good and evil. So it is unreasonable for us to expect them to define these two things. For the simple fact they are indeed innocent. So next: Genesis 3:1-5 1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the Lord God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? 2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: 3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die. 4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: 5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. So this is the claim that's been made. After God realizes they are of the fruit: Genesis 3:22 22 And the Lord God said, behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live forever So again not only God refer to himself in the plural form, but openly admits that they are now like them. Not only did they not die, but they could've been exactly like God if they also ate of the Tree of Life. Sp they're both cursed and driven out of The Garden of Eden. How are they supposed to know what they were doing was wrong? Before the attainment of the knowledge of good and evil? They would be doing things out of innocence. Not only that but the serpents words are validated by God. So how the serpent evil? Wouldn't the serpent be good for being truthful, and having them learn what good and evil is?

In order for a hypothesis to become a theory? It must have a thesis and a set of procedures to elicit certain results. It then gets submitted to peer review where they validate the findings. Evolutionary theory has both a macro and micro parts to it. Micro evolution is easily verifiable. Like beaks on birds getting longer, disease resistance, or changes in bone density. The part that people always rally against is the macro evolution. Where a monkey becomes a man. Evolutionary theory hasn't been around very long. So the collected evidence based on fossil records is incomplete at best. Especially with the degradation of DNA samples over time.

Yes my pseudo online friends Things are getting interesting now. I hope you spent your time wisely by training hard, and getting prepared. Maybe us fitness freaks have something going on huh? http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/31/armed-antifa-group-offers-training-manual-on-terrorism-and-guerrilla-warfare/

Oh wait. It actually can make you dumber. So it can actually be harmful to your cognitive abilities. http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-30-driving-too-much-may-actually-put-your-brain-in-reverse-reveals-new-study.html

They increase the things we do without thinking. The things we do without thinking - therein lies the danger.

Is geoengineering of course. Typically done in the form cloud seeding (aka chem trails), and can be very detrimental to the environment. Of course people think scientific progress is good, but not all progress is good progress. http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-31-after-denying-the-existence-of-geoengineering-the-scientific-status-quo-now-claims-it-can-save-the-world.html

Does anybody have a problem with this? For once can people evaluate the risks involved before releasing this? I swear we deserve every ounce of punishment that we receive today http://www.amtvmedia.com/government-unleashes-mosquitos-on-population-in-potential-mass-kill-dry-run/

"Here is courage, mankind's finest possession, here is the noblest prize that a young man can endeavor to win." -Sparta I never did attend Sunday school, and my OCD prevents me from adopting a biblical world view. The only woman that has truly put a wrench in my plans is my mother lol. Every other woman out there has been pretty easy to deal with. I'm to poor build an arch, to filled with responsibility to run away, and to determined to let wicked men succeed. I've spent over 15yrs of my life preparing for this, and warning others. There is no other purpose to my life. If you want to run then hide in some foresaken hole in the ground? Fine by me. I have my duty to fulfill. Ab honesto virum bonum nihil deterret.

John McCain has many of the same doners as Hillary Clinton. I don't know when people are going to realize the two party system is mostly a smoke screen to achieve the ultimate objective.

It has been my understanding that every able bodied man provide for the common defence. This has been my reading, and what has been taught to me in 11yrs of gun culture. Especially when reviewing the militia movement with their basis in historical facts. It is my impression that a smaller government inevitably leads to leads to more personal responsibility. Where you would outsource your defence to a third party with bigger government. You'd take the burden of such responsibility yourself when downsizing it. It has has always been men's responsibility to defend society, and the basis for our Militias is the Greek & Roman tradition of citizen soldiers. Drawing both from the Spartans, and Athenian examples. Now of course there is Anglo Saxon law as well, but it was a common European custom that men be well armed . Fortunatly, there are many new gun owners since President Obama stepped into office, and subsequently left after his tenor. From 5 million to the current day 110 million. It'd be good to enter the dialogue of how we could better ourselves by engaging in exercises to better our combat readiness. http://constitutionalmilitia.org/ Considering the enemies we face? It probably wouldn't be a bad idea to revive this old tradition. To speak of freedom without personal sacrifice is indulging in a lost cause.

An untested theory is actually a hypothesis. There is a distinct difference between the two, and for good reason. Degraded English is an other problem in society. It's hard for me to imagine that so much of the scientific endeavors is due to incompetence. It definitely seems like there's an agenda at play. Especially in light of the evidence. Personally, the calmness of western societies could really be sedation. Just my two cents.

I've found this to be a compelling episode, and I find it simple to understand. It's also the only White Nationalist podcast that I endorse, because the others (for non-whites) aren't really worth the trouble. https://m.soundcloud.com/florian-geyer-9/mysterium-fasces-episode-17-nationalism-v-colonialism

This thought came to mind recently through my experiences dealing with the Alt Right. I've been following them since early 2015, and before the Muslim invasion (hijrah). Even attending NPI last November with Richard Spencer at Hail Gate. Then I did a podcast interview on TRS. One thing I noticed is a running joke of autism. Until recently I never thought about it much. Then I remembered that something close to 1 in 68 are born with autism, and that up from 1 in 116ish. So that is a serious issue. Especially since more develop it later on through vaccinations. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/additives.htm These adjuvants are extremely toxic, and have been known to cause neurological damage. This is especially concerning when you find out they're continually increasing the number of injections for children. Making things more alarming is that it affects people with darker complexions more than lighter skinned people. This has to do with Vitamin D production, sun exposure, and higher melanin levels that require more time to produce Vitamin D. Autism itself is a serious learning disability. Some of the symptoms are inability to understand social cues, and OCD like behavior. After my recent experience with the Alt Right I began to look at political exchanges differently. Maybe part of rising tensions is due to this disability? Ultimately, I think autistic people should be barred from leading political movements, or at the very least ignored. This is the equivalent of running a marathon with a clubbed foot.

Anybody ever notice that modern politics is a struggle of rhetoric becoming gospel? In the years I've been politically active I've convinced very few to adopt a different world view. Much less a different approach to politics. Maybe it's just testament of my lack of persuasive skills. Anyways, I see the main right wing being broken down into three sections. For lack of better terminology: Alt Right, Alt Lite, and mainstream Conservatism of some sort. Already I'm seeing a three way exchange between these groups. With nobody willing to back down, because they have "the answers" to this political strife. That concerns me. For the communist leftist are willing to take action whenever necessary. While we bicker amongst ourselves. Even though many on the left pale in comparison to former revolutionaries of decades past. So do many people on the right. Maybe i should really just focus on what I'm good at.

One the problems facing us today is the infiltration of communism into American society. For someone like me? Who actually enjoys race realism, and discussing race politics. It's an unfortunate truth that Chicano studies, and many other ethnic studies are heavily Marxist. of course the knee jerk reaction is for conservatives to shut it down, and treat everyone as "individuals." Instead of replacing the Marxist values with more traditional European ones. While allowing the ethnic group in question to pursue self expression as well. http://www.restoring-america.com/Documents/THE NAKED COMMUNIST GOALS WITH NOTES.pdf

I've done a great deal of studying, and have found many troubling things in modern society. Not going into details quite yet, but finding many troubling practices I learned this quote. The philosophy of nefarious people need be learned as well. "Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy....It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise as their schoolmasters would have wished...Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become pathologically impossible..." -Bertrand Russell, 1953