ProRational

I will agree to an extent, the men are being trained outside of their biological foundations. Men are protectors and are prone to not put up with B.S. so the feminization starts early, where boys are punished worse for striking back at an individual who was aggressive towards them. Further more Jung got it right the most common element in society is and must remain that of the hero construct. While single mothers generally produce men made of stone (another growing problem with baby bomber, especially those whose only life consisted of tearing down tradition) these men must confront both the their individual shadow 1. of knowing their are capable of doing both good and harm to anyone who may deserve it, and 2. they must overcome the anima projections that cause the distress that these single mother created. A society has no place for feminism (unless we should consider real suffrage such as the right to vote, or women speaking against a country that truly does not value women like Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and many others). But back on the boys being punished for boys, they are naturally curious and desire learning through experience. You cannot expect boys age 5-12 to sit in a room 8-10 hours a day and listen to a dimwitted teacher drone on about the most irrelevant things in life. So the ADD and ADHD diagnosis go up through the roof because the business of supplying band-aids to address a problem makes more money than addressing a societal problem. To make matters worse (an example here is math teachers) who the hell in their right mind would desire to calculate what is cheaper 300 pounds of cantaloupe for 500 dollars or 2.234 tons 2,045 dollars. It is irrelevant because the person teaching already sees the relevance in life but creates a teaching environment geared towards remembering and regurgitating rather than the importance of such equations. So at least in my experience society said you are a man and punished you for being or trying to achieve becoming one. The society caters too much to victims and not enough to reason. So if a callous fuck-it will teach society a lesson let them learn because the only thing that proves time and time again is the example of history. Sadly if it should come to society in ruins then people will wake up (a not so big if anymore.)

No offense Dylan, but if Bit currency has shown one thing, it is a decent artificially inflated ponzi scheme. It may serve well at value increases as well as cross sea transactions, but when it drops suddenly that means due to it's vulnerability the coins got tapped. If you would like to repeat the end of the roaring twenties be my guest, if you are lucky in time all the better for you.

And Mishi I didn't miss your point, even in France the Legionaries understand the value of contribution. In a retirement community they understand two things primarily, the value of keeping busy as well as contributing. But also the socialist state only eliminates the necessity of new inventions. 1. Nato may not be obsolete but the reliance on a welfare union (EU) as well as U.S. for Nato funding, welfare must end in any case, it is a direct threat to any free market. 2. More successful, while immigrants can serve a roll for their country (to return like Max Manus did to fight the Nazi powers) the countries fore-fitted their right to exist by rolling over to appease the occupiers. If Czechoslovakia fought the Nazis they would possibly have gained support earlier instead of relying on a insurgency to help oust the Nazi occupiers. 3. Not all the Norse as you say bought the pure Aryan society goal. Many were angry to see the fascists take over in the universities, the press, and any decent educational benefits from a place open to all intellectual studies, not to mention the take over of various jobs by the higher echelons of Nazi party society. Also I didn't use the word poor. Which insurrection's are these you speak of? The Che involvement in the May 6th movement where naiive journalists bolstered support against Baptista, or the Hindsight 20/20 revelations of who we supported in the Soviet/Afghan war in which the professional's failed to asses the capabilities of Ahmad Shah Massoud, and supported several who were or later decided to become open communists? If you'd like a Hemisphere, the most beneficial to the western hemisphere was the United States of America under a free market where the automobile, airplane, electricity, electronic personal computers, microprocessors, you name it the U.S created such inventions under a minimally regulated market. The greatest inventions of the 19th century were created by the U.S. the assembly line (Fords free books on Zionist conspiracies to keep Muhammadan workers aside) created a nation capable to help defeat three axis's of evil. Also Mishi nothing mean was said, it was just words. I appreciate the etiquette you used.

Nazi's were not Catholic by any right. Himmler was a progressive in Hitlers party who was a devote occultist, why do you think the Nazis bastardized the word Aryan of which they had no understanding of the Aryan race, the German people upon it being to late due to the lack of a spine gave the Nazi party a good rise to power, and found its true colors when little Hans could turn in mama or papa into the Gestapo for not being Pro-Reich enough, or how about the MVD, KGB, NKVD, who silenced any criticism of the leadership or governmental policies. Again the hysteria of the masses, who were indoctrinated by science, and psychology. Just as today we do not hear the word caliphate in grade school in the U.S. we heard no mention of Umyyad or Saladin, yet we learned of the Crusades as being violent Catholics who took the east by storm, only to fold their bloody hands and kneel waist high in blood.

It was at the hands of using science and psychology to push atheism and force the few remaining religious churches to become symbiotic parasites with the state, it was not the leader but the hands of the intellectually misguided that pushed for the slaughter. Again death of morals and ethics in a country that promised utopia. Morals are only good if a society maintains them. Like the analogy of Christians being the light of a country once a christian leadership takes a stance to silence something bad to prevent a black eye they let the interior erode from with in (an apple rots from it core). Science is quite funny because it has been used for both great and horrific things, same with psychology. One can say the same for See no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil, it was the indifference of the three that caused evil not just the evil acts performed. It is indifference as well as a moral laxity that causes such states. Furthermore, it is also the inability to not say it like it is, that causes this indifference. If abortion was justified by the 1% outliers, it would be because no one shut up the liberal who said but I was raped (while this is a terrible crime, she did a far worse crime which is murder). Morals are necessary to foster the continuation of a society not just legally but ethically as well. Religion was for the longest time a system to maintain guidance for the average citizen, but if the majority of them forget their humanity as well as the humanity of those around them, then you have the holocaust, da'esh slaughtering entire towns because they are not of their tribe, you have the Hutus slaughtering tootsies, you have a large group of people who failed to take a stand and went with societal hysteria (of which science and psychology had a part) to achieve the greatest atrocities of mankind.

I agree mishi all in favor of Rhode Island, or how about New Jersey succession and the U.S. or how about the cut off entitlements (for military industries) in those socialist NATO countries all in favor say Aye. Mathematically speaking the U.S. has carried such countries in NATO for them to grow entitled to our military support. Because population wise, the U.S. has about 324 million as opposed to the countries you have listed which have roughly 15.4 million 15.5 if you were to count san marino (whose military industry is practically non-existent outside of U.S. and EU help). So I like these millennial ideas stemming from years of falsehood that a utopia is achievable. So if those countries knew they could exist with out being a parasite to bigger countries they would have been more successful historically speaking instead of maintaining neutrality or state governments rolling on their belly every time they are faced with a chance to fight. In which case the UK saved Norway's butt (by providing paramilitary support to max manus and others including the commandos that sabotaged the heavy water plant in Oslo until the Allied front could move close enough for a German withdrawal from the area) as well as support for former Czechoslovakia when their government decided to role over (Operation Anthropoid).

I will open up by saying if something isn't broke don't fix it (the marriage of Christian's and the stance taken against seeking hedonistic pleasure) It's not an issue of God, when I mentioned "the question is not where was God when the Holocaust happened, it is where was humanity" it is not a question of which God one serves it is a question of Human's of human's being human's. Consider a person prone to take advantage of individuals (politics, social welfare, mental health, family, religion) will more times than not do just that and in such events, and will use their power dynamic to manipulate individuals in such situations. Furthermore it can also be a situation that is often based of necessity or lack of communication. I had a quasi-spiritualistic father who claimed how bad Christians were, and with that high moral ground hated Christians with the same visceral contention that he claimed he was against. Funny thing is he's a Democrat now (or at least when I last saw the old cunt). Funny thing is he fought against the democrats in the south (which long used the mark of Cain to justify slavery) only to fall victim to their lies on Socialism. If anything religion in particular Judaeo-Christian faiths had set a frame work that works for the family dynamic, starting with the sacred institution of marriage between a man and a woman, in which the popular atheism of the Communist regime saw as a direct threat to the totalitarian government that used a high moral and scientific stance of knowledge over faith. I will encourage anyone to look at North Korea and why a Minister can serve a life sentence for leaving a bible in a apartment drawer. Judaeo-Christian faiths set a conservative frame work for what works in a society. Now in our country couples marry early and in the pursuit of a pseudo-happiness leave each other instead of working things out. While a man can copulate with a woman, it is not actual love which is doing what is best for those you love even when it hurts you in the end, still his responsibility to aid in that child's life. People now instead of pursuing a working relationship, men testing to see if they love the women, and women not choosing a bread winner that they can be satisfied on more than financial stability or personality level, are pursuing a hedonistic life style in which the direct result is the decay of a society or community. The punishment for unbridled pleasure (sin) is pain. It is a pain that is felt in the community as well as the generations to come. So again it comes down to a matter of transparency not just morals. Just like the Democratic socialist's now have a floundering moral high ground, a faith community must maintain that unchanged moral stance in the face of adversity. Christian's in some aspects were likened to the light of the world and when the light is extinguished or hidden other's were left without guidance. If Jesus said it is better for a weight to be put about a man's neck and for him to be cast into the sea than for him to harm a child, and the Roman Catholic church hid this for many years they hid the light of Christ and set the Church into darkness (or better a situation of not adhering to the scriptures and not maintaining what they stood for). The first sign of a communistic type presence in a given society is the increasing popularity of Atheism (in which the young generation of the 60's and 70's tried to fight against institutionalized tradition) only to fall prey to communist ideals. Look at Saul Alinsky, look at how the SDS formed into the weathermen and later the underground. Also the one driving factor that radicalized individuals in the SDS was their hedonistic tendencies, it was not necessarily the man shutting down their protests so much as it was their public nudity and open display of drugs.

It's not just the ISP's who benefit it is the same individuals who under the telecommunications act of 1996 (the deregulation) of multiple media/cross media ownership. Jeff Bezos founder of Amazon and Washington Post. Several media mergers (pretty much a violation of anti-trust as well as monopoly laws) To further the repeal of Net Neutrality is not only an attack on independent journalism it is also a sneaky way through multiple steps, the deregulation of cross media ownership, as well as the repeal of net neutrality was to further a progressive movement and institute a biased state media with in the country. And the question becomes small government with minimal regulation as well as necessary enforcement of various laws to prevent such things. Also, the question is not the privilege of the 1% but a question of what they do with it. People with the necessary funds could outright buy a country if the media are on their side (as far as political agenda) to influence the people's opinions. If you hear the same thing from news organization's that people once trusted (you will effectively eliminate the apparent need of a fourth estate in this case independent journalism to maintain a necessary degree of transparency for such individuals). Both sides not accepting nuance was taken advantage of by both sides of the aisle. One the few owners of media in this country did just that by claiming that the Russian's were behind the "fake news" it turns out a young man who couldn't make a living in Macedonia turned to the internet. Who is to blame for the fake news articles being spread, it was add trackers from google. The ad-trackers moved the articles from nasty sites such as porn and other sites to the mainstream social media. I will further this by saying the Russian collusion on hacking was a bit suspect as far as DNC hacks because Hillary's own campaign members did not trust her (after the email wipe on her email servers) the breach was further facilitated by a chaos hacker known as Gucifer. Gucifer had a reputation of causing chaos between multiple countries as well as against Russia. Before the fake news regarding "Russian fake news" came out he gave several user names as well as passwords to various DNC accounts to the media while in jail state side. Using the dark web he could have furthered this by releasing various user names further create chaos by individuals on the dark web. But the easiest and most efficient way to get those emails was for an individual to use windows dual boot, and upload onto an external ssd the emails when using a stripped down version of a linux OS. The emails would have been downloaded in the shortest time and with out suspicion. Further this by the fact that while Hillary was in Secretary of State she encountered the same email malware as well as the fact that anyone with an internet connection could have downloaded this. That was the case where a power company on the eastern coast of U.S. freaked out because a guy on his personal laptop downloaded such malware. Various journalist's have done great thing when faced with the violent censorship of state media. From the burning of a couple UK terrorists working in the daesh controlled areas. As well as those that supported the Arab Spring (of which the U.S. as well as the U.K. was giving methods of web tracking to suppress with-in states that the U.S.A was sponsoring. A lot of journalist died to bring the truth which the truth will always win even if people may chose to ignore it. While Snowden may have been hailed either as a terrorist or a freedom fighter, our country on social media as well as in the media are proving the point Journalist's need protection especially when government's attempt to create a hostile environment for the truth. But both sides put up a false flag in an attempt to cover for the truth. Now Mueller was presented a difficult task of either cleaning the dirty internal politics of the state or to only burn those necessary to save the American people from killing each other. Either way a bit chain application will prevent such leaks, as well as provide the necessary oversight to protect the Journalists as well as the state secrets. But if one side prefers to hide the truth then the other side can counter due to the unnecessary lack of oversight involved. And I will further this by stating that the PanPrs presented an interesting case for the lack of oversight under obama's admin, countries (and their companies) were funding terrorists in Syria while avoiding the embargo put upon any country that does business with terrorists. This include the Saudi's whose king funded/oversaw a charity organization that directly provided material support for Al-Qaeda.

As a last resort (or another example is to create fear among a Sufi extremist) in the Soviet Bloc countries there were many women who created high body counts for Fascists. One was a lady who fought the Nazi occupation of Ukraine, the other is the YPJ both last resorts. The women who fought for Ukraine (argued her case not to become a nurse stating her marksmanship skills would be better suited to the war effort) against Nazi's and was instrumental in the U.S. signing War bonds to aid the Soviet Union before entry into the second world war. The YPJ are a group of Kurdish women who struck fear into daesh, due to the humiliation of being killed by a women as well as the very necessity for the Kurdish women's survival. They did not due to the sectarian violence have the luxury of being compassionate, nor did they have the luxury of raising children, because the children they had if the Kurdish fighters failed would have been killed along with the rest of the Kurds.

The Buddha said if you meet the real Buddha kill him. This was a message to never stop improving oneself. The Hesychast Monasteries (an acetic type of Eastern Christian Monasticism) follows the same ideals to never stop improving oneself. So do several orders of Catholic Monasticism (Benedictine Order, Franciscan Order, and the Carmelites) the use of a religious leader in Catholicism (is one who is sworn never to do violence, which if employed correctly maintains the example of justice but I will follow up on that latter. Also, due to freewill and the neglect of certain guiding foundations they may have chosen various excesses, thereby contradicting faith. Hesychast's teach that man's punishment for seeking unnatural pleasure (sin) which corrupts his union with the creator, is pain which could be emotional. This is not to associate God a perfect being, with those he chose to love (mankind an imperfect being). Man is (at-least according to Christians) to have free will, if man has free will he can use his status or privilege of power for either good or bad reasons (Or to believe or disbelieve in Him.) The Catholic church when it covered up the sexual scandal to avoid a black-eye did so out of their free will. The pain of such a sin was that a lot of faithful could not reconcile being part of such a faith. To approach on other Abrahamic faiths I will say that Israel in modern times had been promised its territory by the British before WWI and under the League of Nations after WWI as well as after WWII. The question (again arguing a non-philosophical point) is not where was God during the final solution under the third Reich it was where was humanity. Also theology would not be a Scientific school of thought because if the presence of God were proven, then where would the test of faith be. If you prove something exists then no one has to have faith. Thereby defeating man's free will, if man were to know God exists he would not have to have faith in the unseen, but because He's unseen and intangible doesn't mean He can't be felt on an emotional (or better Spiritual level). Back onto the topic of the Holocaust, it was God's promise to the Jewish people that they should return to the land of their ancestors. He did but not before a lot of horrible things on man's part were done. This is also quite ironic because the Nazi party had various occult ideals and twisted their idea of what God was to suit their political agenda. I also find it ironic that Hitler and various others attempting to exterminate those they thought were impure actually ended up serving God's promise to the Jews, who some still had faith and it was restored in others once they reached their promised land again. One can say God doesn't exist and walk through life believing in an uneventful end by just closing their eyes and sleeping. But also one can say (which is mentioned by even people of the soviet union who were encouraged to embrace atheism) that something had to be guiding them. They believed by rights, when science and all material understanding said they should die and they did not that something had to be guiding them, or an unseen presence was with them that saved them, this was felt when they thought nothing was there to save them. On the subject of the fifth commandment the Christian English bible said thou shall not kill, due to the misinterpretation translating from Hebrew of which has many words for one English word will have subtle difference that make the sentence context a lot different based on how one might translate a word. It is thou shall not commit murder the intentional taking of a person's life. If one were to bring up the doctrine of a just war for the Crusades, (actions based on the individuals) many men fought in defense of their lives some of which only killed when in self-defense (others out of anger or malice which would be murder.) This actually was in a sense an act of love as it had been the violent expansion of the caliphate that threatened the people's existence (not just culturally but there was unjust extortion of the use of the Jizya by the Muslims who began to sack Constantinople and Antioch) but also the violence of the Muslims who were using the idea of Sharia law to exterminate the non-believer. Sharia while not new to Islam, Hafez was a great critic of Sharia and a Muslim pointing out those who professed its necessity as well as their lack to adhere to it. It is not a question of God, it is a question of man abandoning his morals to achieve pleasure (a Christian can say that Islamic terrorism is a way of God punishing America.) But more accurate would be the breakdown of Family values and reluctance of people to take a stand in a society that encourages hedonism on one hand, and an unjust sense of law on the other. If one were to see his fellow brother or sister do something incorrect and not say something it encourages a breakdown in both himself or his fellow brother or sister. It is the morals in a society that go before ethics start breaking down, and when ethics break down a society can get very discontent because it can seem like everyone is wrong because no one knows what to believe (facts get mangled in fiction).

Are there enough historical examples in our nation and in the current war to present a clear case? I know the United States Marine Corps just had the first woman pass OCS and is now in the 1st Marines. Their are several women in the history of WWII from other nations, but were their achievements over publicized?

To add onto this look at recent Project Veritas and their recent battle with Washington Post

https://www.elitedaily.com/money/the-worlds-10-largest-media-conglomerates Alright Washington Post has a long history of not fact checking and not keeping information relevant (instead of the fall of Raqqa) they were up in arms about a few of Trumps tweets. Further this with Ajit Pai and the passing of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 this can be used to bully independent journalists who do not follow the narrative of Mainstream media. Ask your self this Trump-Russia conspiracy and the mention of but the one percent. Combine that with the "ANTI FA" movement using violence to censor free-speech in particular against conservatives. Now Jeff Bezos is worth 100 billion dollars, he owns Amazon as well as the Huffington Post. Amazon has a history of taking conservative books down at the first allegations of Libel and under their policies to enforce this turn a blind eye for Liberal authored books even at the slightest hint of this. Now look at the second video look at 4:12 (4 minutes 12 seconds) if net neutrality existed then and this was illegal when Comcast had been throttling Netflix to coerce them into a merger. Why wouldn't the media conglomerations use this to censor the independent journalists into only promoting one singular agenda. Also cross reference Amazon and it's on the Panama papers just by the name Amazon. Who benefits more from Net Neutrality being repealed and who is accusing Trump of Russian collusion. I will quote Goebble's on this one (Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty) also I will add who benefits more from the disarmament of the U.S.A. the Liberal progressive agenda. Look at the names on the list (one promoted third wave feminism Emily Watson hailed by the U.N. as Women of the Year) Hypocritical of the U.N. when they smuggled their sex slaves to the area of operations in which they went so far as defaming Kathryn Bolkovac for exposing it. Also, Hillary hired P.I.'s to investigate the background of women's lives to bring up dirt on them who brought accusations against Bill Clinton. And then while running for President she told women to come forward in-order to come forward on their sexual assault. So tell me who benefits from the repealing of net-neutrality?

The de-moralization is in effect on both sides, the victim narrative and identity politics play both into the division and bankruptcy of this country. And the question of resources (as far as mental health I will say it will only enable such individuals) so the question is none.

I was born to an unhealthy parent and through their irrational sensibilities, I was hospitalized several times in my early youth. The individuals in charge of young children in such places had no business helping another, and a parent that told a child that they would grow up to become a murderer set me on a very angry path to anyone who would help, this was especially prevalent when others tried to help (in which the anger and betrayal that I hung onto presented a poor narrative towards those who may genuinely like to help) The early years where pretty fucked up, but I held onto the anger for many years up until this year. I only met two psychologists worthy of that title (One was a no-bullshit type who didn't push his ideologies) and another who taught me through various stories and narratives to do my research. While the last one may have pushed his therapy as well, it was the only one that was worthy of considering (which sowed the seeds for this year). But aside from that this year and watching Antifa on the net, and various other SJWs taught me how much BS went on in my teen years, one of which was in which the parent called blocking hitting them [I guess it never crossed their mind that continually hitting teens would eventually result in getting hit] I ended up at a juvenile treatment facility where the previous the local MH clinic told me the parent was abandoning me there, and they told the parent I didn't want to go home. Fast forward a couple weeks I ended up in jail due to running away with a pocket knife (to which I reacted poorly when I found out the parent said I threatened them, again their narrative changes but the one thing that struck me was that she said it was my eyes that were soo threatening. [Note: the knife was sheathed and not held by handle] but due to my poor speech to the police when they had shown up was very poor further hindering my odds of a fair trial. I got out on a deferred sentence. I internalized this narrative that the system was unfair and biased (I learned the beginnings of a white privilege narrative pushed by ethnic politicians in my state) I revolted at the system as the "fairness and equality" of anarchy by another scrawny white kid were whispered to me as we talked, it sounded reasonable but logic is not always critical. And then was put into a children's treatment center. This children's home had no business helping anyone. Imagine a zoo where many angry animals are in the same cage and encouraged to behave and provoked by the keepers all the same. Add another psychologist to the mix (who was too sensitive about othering but frequently took the opportunity to other). The system later took a turn as I flipped out and reported myself to a P.O. due to another fight with the parent again to which I reacted poorly. Anyway, I got out of the legal system and was encouraged to take up the handouts of the socialist system. I went to an adult group home, in which a person was encouraged to vegetate in front of a TV watching re-runs of M*A*S*H and little house on a prairie. If you weren't cutting craft paper and other shitty kindergarten crafts. I hated it and made the mistake of falling in love with a foodie (note that the relationship quickly turned out to be an immense amount of turmoil on both sides it was more like a parasitic relationship on both my side and hers) I didn't like the emotional eating and felt compelled for a short time to bear the burden of taking up another person's emotions. But the narrative in all these years was that you are helpless (as far as the mental health side) and encouraged by the BS statistics and witch doctors, whose first response was to prescribe antipsychotics dope a person out of their mind so that they would not put up a fight and would become easier to deal with. But a blessing was to get kicked out of that group home because I became too poor to afford my meds. I found out the meds were causing more depression and sleeplessness then they were supposed to treat. Because I got so poor I couldn't afford the medicine I actually was less depressed and slept more when I didn't take them. My experiences later up until this year were watching mentally ill people have their symptoms get worse by the guesswork of psychologists (they prefer to state that they are also MDs) pushing meds in an unscientific manner but then guesswork began on their new proposed diagnosis. Turns out the capable professionals were not so informed on the way they prescribed pills. But I have to say that group therapy is more of a pissing contest to see who can be the biggest victim. And watching the SJWs showed me how bad of an uninformed argument looks on camera (this is to include feeling cool pretending not to conform and try to become a punk-rocker/anarchist). But the therapy of one good psychologist is what pushed me to research topics from credible sources on the constitution and slavery and the crusades. Of which I found freedomain, while I won't make a haphazard lapse of cult for this site I will say it is a good forum to share and encourage others. And the lesson from this is the only person you can rely on is yourself and if someone pushes an idea of what is best, don't take their word for such bullshit find out for yourself. If someone tells you that you will not succeed, to an extent take it as encouragement that you are on the right path and never let yourself fall for the victim narrative. A victim is only a person who gave up fighting and decided to live in the moment they hated so much.