I was kicking this thought around in my head while I was washing dishes and I feel a little bit fogged when I try to reason it out. It's a question:
If UPB posits that theories about human behavior must be universal, then how does one reconcile UPB with the idea that there are human predators (sociopaths) who are a different class of human?
Maybe my disconnect is in the last four words of the question. I'm confused. How large of a distinction, in terms of morality, can one make between "predator" humans and "healthy" humans if at all? Perhaps I'm taking Stef too literally when he says that there's this distinct type of human that is not like all the other humans? That must be it. Would anyone care to enlighten my thinking here?