Dylan Lawrence Moore

My understanding on this is flaky; enlighten me if you're able. Under the current US system, my current understanding is that private banks also have the power to create currency through fractional reserve lending (under the dictate of the government, of course). I see the point that in a system where money is initially created by "borrowing" it from the Federal Reserve, the total amount of money available must be equal to the amount of debt "owed" back in taxes. Under this I totally see your "right to a government job" point. However, when you add fractional reserve banking into the mix, the private sector, once it is able to get its hands on money distributed to government employees and contractors, is able to further create money. This is where my understanding is gathering friction with the new information I'm getting from you and what you're posting; why is the total amount of money equal to the national deficit if private banks have a hand in creating money? And, if there is a "private sector method" of creating government money, wouldn't that affect the "right to a job" idea you've proposed?

"Would a good person hold these kinds of views?" "Yes. Any other questions?" I don't have any advice for dealing with in-laws or for therapy. Your situation sounds rough and I've known some parents of friends who are like what you've described. I will say this, though: It's painful to discover that your degrees are literally economically worthless--even ironically economically worthless for your economics degree. I think, and this is coming from someone with a BS in chemistry, the sooner you accept that your degrees won't help you, the sooner you can go forth into the world without leaning on them. From what I was able to gather from your writing style, and correct me if I'm wrong here, your attitude is starting to eat you alive because of your rough situation. You seem like a good guy that works hard that just can't move in the direction he wants, stuck in a Catch 22 where you would have more confidence if you could start pulling more weight, but you can't pull more weight until you get some more confidence (the reason I point this out is because I've been there). Coming up with a working plan and moving forward with it with confidence will start to adjust your mood. A better mood will help make these problems seem more manageable. Good luck in Cali.

Yea, I think the German-speaking world is dying for better media.

I think that's an excellent argument to make to Christians about circumcision. It's a powerful irrational argument for disabling an irrational argument.

I'm still chuckling that this thread isn't losing momentum. And I'm still euphoric that the seeds of freedom and anarchism will continue to have fertile ground in which to grow.

Also, start creating your own media and writing your own articles and posting them publicly. The people who can't handle you will do the unfriending for you.

You know you can turn off individuals from your minifeed, right?

Sweet! (Although I like my name better. )

No. I can already see from what you've posted that you have enough knowledge, understanding, and wherewithal to construct sound arguments and generate your own media. You're doing a disservice to everyone around you, including yourself, if you spend your time in the FDR boards arguing with dsayers, or hanging around the FDR boards in general where the people you'll find are generally like-minded*, instead of expanding to where to these topics are unknown. *I've obviously made an assumption here that you're not taking these topics to other platforms. Correct me if I'm wrong. I'm working with very little data, but from what I've seen it's pretty telling. It looks like you have a lot of knowledge, however you have a self-confidence problem, right?

So solve the fucking problem.

Time to start making your own media and spending less time posting on boards. Fighting with the problem myself.

You showed some serious fuckin' endurance to get to that point.

You drove on public roads, and that means you support the state. Statist.

You caught me. Slave and a liar who believes he owns you.

What was that, dsayers? The connection was really bad and I wasn't quite able to make out what you said. It sounded like you really appreciate the opportunity to continue to be able to have discourse and disagreements with people in a setting which allows free speech, and that you're thankful of the hard work people have put in to make sure that you continue to have that ability. We're happy to help!

What? I only pissed off two people with this video? Lame.

Twitter Suspends More Accounts! Stock price as of 8am PST 11/15: $18.79 CEO Threaterns to Assassinate Trump with Snipe Rifle Apparently no publicly traded stock to watch. GrubHub's stock is starting to climb back up. Looks like they dodged the bullet there.

Election is over. Time for a Truth about the Dakota Pipeline?

This is getting off topic from what I posted. So you're saying that I just drank in a bunch of bullshit from the Philosophic Corruption of Reality?

Definitely, MMD! I was looking for commentary on his cabinet. I quit following him at one point, but I do know he made the transition from libertarianism to anarchism at one point, and I think a lot of it had to do with Stef's input (I remember them having discussions about the topic). He remained in the anarchist camp that the whole presidential election was still a dog and pony show all around and Trump was selected by shadow elites, as opposed to him being a grassroots republicanism reaction in opposition to the global elite, made possible by utilizing social media to get around the MSM. He seems to be backing up this argument by looking at Trump's cabinet. Early chemists and physicists hooked on to few points of the solipsistic metaphysics that was coming out of German romanticism, primarily originating from Immanual Kant, and projected it forward into the modern chemistry and physics that developed in the 1920s. This is where we get all the crazy perception-is-reality and quantum contradictory states happening at the same time sort of stuff. Check out Peace Revolution Podcast 062 if you want the story from beginning to end.

Reparations for Social Justice?

Thanks for your input, Blimpmerchant. Question about all these themes--I've noticed that the new fashion for websites is the have this infinite-scroll-down feature, where there is a big pretty picture in the background that takes up most of the screen and you scroll down to find small bits of information in the form of large icons. Is this the standard these days? They're very pretty, but they're really not that functional in terms of having a lot of content. Like Corbett Report or FDR or my own website, there is a fairly clear beginning and end to each page. If a page is long, it's because it has a lot of content to go through. With these themes that on the link you've provided, are they compatible with a site that's more content-heavy and has a clear bottom to scroll down to?

Now that my euphoria about not needing to be evaporated in a nuclear war with Russia has died down, I've gone back to checking out media outlets that never left the "voting is a bunch of bull" camp. James Corbett was one of my favorite guys to tune into, and he is on top of keeping track of just who Trump is keeping around him. Here's the article: Meet Team Trump by James Corbett (Note: the Quote function appears to be buggy right now, so I'm not using it.) "Apparently some people voted for Trump in the belief that he was some sort of anti-establishment truth-telling hero of the working class. I hate to be the one to disabuse you of this notion, so let's just look at his transition team, his campaign team, the people who have already been tapped to be part of the new administration and the people who are being contacted for potential cabinet appointments. Warning: It's not a pretty picture. So who's leading this transition team that's helping to sort out the cabinet and move Team Trump into the White House? Oh, just the usual assortment of bankster-connected corporate lobbyists we would expect to be hanging around any president-elect. This time is no exception. From former Goldman Sachs lobbyist Eric Ueland to Koch Industries lobbyist Michael Catanzaro to Aetna / Verizon lobbyist William Palatucci, the gaggle of corporate cronies manning Trump for America Inc. (the actual nonprofit group set up to oversee the transition) are as establishment as they come. And the whole kit-and-kaboodle is being run by Chris Christie. Yes, that Chris Christie. And who are they reaching out to for potential positions in the Trump White House? Steven Mnuchin - The chief fundraiser for the Trump campaign was not featured in a lot of alt-right cheerleading for the Trump train, and for good reason: He is a 17-year Goldman Sachs veteran who went on to work for Soros Fund Management. Yes, that Soros. Oh, and he donated to Hillary Clinton. But other than that, I'm sure he's a great fundraiser. Which is why he is apparently a frontrunner to be Secretary of the Treasury in the Trump White House. That's right folks, yet another Goldman Sachs vampire squid alumni is within a hair's breadth of taking over the Treasury, just like Hank Paulson and Robert Rubin before him. But don't worry, because another person in consideration for the Treasury Secretary position is... Jamie Dimon - I'm going to assume you know who Jamie Dimon is, but just to make sure everyone is aware, let me spell it out in black and white: Jamie Dimon is chairman, president and chief executive officer of JPMorgan Chase, the monstrous banking offspring of JP Morgan & Co. and the Rockefellers' own Chase Manhattan. Other than Lloyd "God's work" Blankfein, it would be hard to find a more bankster-y bankster in the world of banksterism. To list Dimon's entire rap sheet would be an editorial unto itself, but let's just remind ourselves of his role in the 2008 bailout fiasco via my Federal Reserve documentary, Century of Enslavement. If there's any ray of hope here, it's that (as I discussed with James Evan Pilato on a recent edition of New World Next Week), Dimon recently said he wouldn't want to become Treasury Secretary due to "Democrat-Republican bullshit." As Pearse Redmond points out, the Trump team may be floating Dimon's name right now to make it seem not so bad when they "only" appoint Goldman/Soros insider Mnuchin to the position, John Bolton - John Bolton is a career Republican insider who served roles in both Bush White Houses, including most recently as UN Ambassador in 2005-2006. He's also the worst kind of crazed, bloodthirsty neocon who has literally never heard of a foreign invasion he didn't lust after. Don't take my word for it, listen to him explain Trump's foreign policy imperatives...for as many seconds as you can stomach it. And yes, he's commenting on Trump's foreign policy because he has been advising the Trump campaign and has been name-dropped for monthsas a possible Secretary of State in the Trump cabinet. So are all of those who voted Trump over Hillary because they didn't like her warmongering suitably upset now? Well if not there's always his picks for Secretary of Defense, like: Stephen Hadley - Hadley is the man who, acting as Bush Jr.'s Deputy National Security Advisor, served as the conduit for the ridiculously fake yellowcake uranium forgeries that were used to help drum up the war in Iraq. He was also the guy who kept the bogus yellowcake story in Bush's October 2002 speech in Cincinnati laying out the case for the illegal bloody war of aggression in Iraq. A share of the million dead Iraqi's blood is on his hands. And he's in the running to be Trump's Secretary of Defense. Reince Priebus - Nothing says "anti-establishment party outsider" like the current chairman of the Republican National Committee, right? Well, guess what: Reince Priebus is under consideration for Trump's chief of staff. You know, the highest ranking employee of the White House? Priebus is apparently competing against the likes of Stephen Bannon (Trump campaign C.E.O. and former head of Breitbart News) and Jared Kushner's (The Donald's own son-in-law who the Times of Israel takes great pains to point out is an Orthodox Jew, as is Ivanka Trump). Regardless of who gets the spot, the very fact that Priebus is in the running shows that Trump's feud with the Republican Party was about as real as Hulk Hogan and Andre the Giant at Wrestlemania. Rudy Giuliani - Rudy Giuliani is an unconvicted 9/11 criminal who illegally cleared the 9/11 crime scene, and who failed to pass on the prior warning that he received about the towers' destruction. He is also hated by the New York Fire Department for having kicked the firemen off the pile as soon as the gold was discovered. As Associate Attorney General in 1981 he was involved in the PROMIS software octopus. He oversaw New York's unconstitutional stop-and-frisk policing policy. He is a ghoul in every sense. So naturally the only question is which spot will he fill in the Trump cabinet: Attorney General, DHS chief, cybersecurity czar, or something else entirely?" Corbett goes on to accurately criticize the concept of voting and roll his eyes over a "change" candidate that we've been promised once again. He implies that Trump was selected, as per usual for presidential candidates. However, I have a hard time swallowing this to be true, especially from the way the media absolutely lost their shit in the process of the election, and how they had to eviscerate every last remnant of their credibility to do so. To say that the shadow elite played another Oceans 11 on everyone, by instilling a grass-roots movement where countless individuals, via social media, encouraged each other to go vote under the pressure of omnipresent SJW scorn and violence, is a bit hard for me to swallow. I can understand that Trump may have been tempted by the devil in exchange for something, or that he doesn't have the political wherewithal to crash into the White House appointing anyone he sees fit, but I'm having a hard time swallowing that this was just another well-planned Illuminati chess move. I haven't seen Stef and James chat for some time now and it would be neat if they could do it again. I would particularly appreciate Stef's view (as well as Milo's and Mike Cernovich's) on this gang of same ol' shitters. James has often said his original inspiration for his site was from listening to Alex Jones, and I think he got a lot of his anarchist philosophy and understanding directly from Stef. It's not like these factions are long-time enemies. But, as James points out in the article, though you can feel the sarcasm seeping through, Trump won't actually be selecting a cabinet until January. Will he surprise everyone with some better members? Despite the possibility that we may be driving down the road of the same globalist swine, there are still a few things I'm happy about with a Trump win. No Hillary Clinton. Like, fo' reals yo. War with Russia is bad enough, even without nukes. Ask Napolean and Hitler. I still feel that a Trump over Clinton presidency gives Western Civ the chance for a few more heart beats. The death of the mainstream media. Hallelujah! Even if Trump surrounds himself with a neocon gangster squad, I'm still crossing my fingers that these fuckers lose their subsidies. Without that, they won't even be able to virtue signal each other. The MASSIVE rise of the "alternative" media. How many new subscribers did FDR get throughout all this? What about Milo injecting free speech back into universities? Now is the time to start your own voice via Youtube or Twitter or Facebook or a blog or a website or whatever. Now is our chance to scream the roofs down with reason and philosophy. Regardless of Trump's intention, the momentum towards freedom has been generated and it needs to be capitalized on NOW. The beginning of the death of the social justice. While I still think it's going to be awhile before this human bilge tube purges itself, it has been surgically removed from its host before it self-destructs. Already companies like Twitter and GrubHub are feeling the direct effects on their stock prices from siding with SJW's over "camp conservative". We are seeing over and over again that these guys simply evaporate in a free market*. This movement will blow up like the German romanticists of the 1800s. We will need to be wary going forward that small bits of their ideology remain unnoticed in the social conversation, just as German romanticism (mainly via Kant) continues to infect our scientific understand of the universe in relativity and quantum theory. As Stef mentioned in one of his videos, let us take a moment to thank the Clintons for becoming the instant litmus test for determining moral character. The zombies in our midst are now openly identifiable, which means we can make better decisions much easier about who to associate with in the future. *If anyone sees another company openly attacking Trump or banning a real conservative pundit ("real" here meaning Milos, D'Souzas, Shapiros, etc. NOT Glenn Becks and Rush Limbaughs), please contact me about it immediately. The stocks of these companies need to be shorted! We're going to need to get over our euphoria fast and hold Trump's feet to the fire. We're still buried in a corrupt and immoral system and voting is still an opinion with a gun. Curious for others' input. I still feel Trump's election is the first American shockwave of a new resistance to Marxism.

Seriously, though. Next time there is an article reporting a business doing this, share it as fast as possible so I can short the stock! I'll even pay tips. Twitter lost like 25% of its stock price when it banned Milo. This CEO dropped his company a similar amount. Despite the vanities of their virtue signalling, social justice literally spells death for companies that operate in the free market. This is low-hanging fruit waiting to be picked!

I would be pretty happy with someone simple. Like I mentioned, I like the content layout of corbettreport.com (though I find it a little sterile aesthetically), and I like-ish the aesthetics of my website at crazyrogue.net, but I don't like the content layout. So basically something with a layout similar to Corbett's site, with some better aesthetic qualities (not necessarily themed like my site). I find your site has too much going on and I'm not sure where to focus my eyes. I think the menu on the left is taking up too much attention.