bishal

I will try this thanks.

Hello, I just listened to the interview about IQ and also heard before from Stefan that every people can take IQ-test coz its so that its not related to education or word comprehension, but just cognition. I tried to search this kind of test online but the test i found has 'grammar' type questions in it. Can anyone recommend me the most reliable place where i can test my IQ probably online? If Stefan himself could recommends any such IQ-test taking websites it would be great!!! Thanks

This is like more then 10 books you are talking about.. so why don't you just copy paste each title in google and check for libertarian thought on them yourself. But just for brief understanding here are some links you can use: http://fee.org/publications/page/cliches-of-progressivism http://tomwoods.com/blog/ I can understand if someone hates Capitalism and Communism equally as an starting point but when if an so called educated guys still hate both equally i believe they have emotional problem with the word 'Capitalism' (public school brainwashing) and if you hate something emotionally no knowledge can change it instead you will be more against it as more evidence supports it. Just be aware when arguing with these kinds of guys!

Thank you all for your response guys.. I am doing more research in this subject. But for the record i am out of contact with my most of toxic physical past. I have also shown my nutritions level and they are very good. I am very low in exercise though. I have never been on medication of any kind my whole life and was average kid with no special talent. The main problem is that i cannot get go, i have been learning about self-knowledge and philosophy from about 3 years but cannot remember anything when i want it. I have problem concentrating myself too. I will have thoughts going on in my mind but when i start to write it down nothing comes up. It's been a struggle to remember what i clearly knew a month ago. And when i did depression test i got 24 (which is more then average) so i went to psychiatrist. I am visiting another psychotherapist too. I want to know what it looks like when i get motivated in interest at least for once and not forgetting it...you know. And if medication can help me once to get in touch with my lost passion, i am thinking of trying it. But before i want to know as much as possible about the drug i am going to use. If anyone has an advice what can i do for my forgetful pattern i.e. i remember everything a mont ago and i just forget it. Can anyone suggest me something what can i do to save myself from this forgetfulness?

Thanks for interest.. My psychiatrist may have prescribed this particular drug coz i was also feeling energy less, lack of concentration and bad memory. And wants me to start with very low dosage and tlk with him every month plus he himself recommended me a psychologist too. My talk therapy was IFS in skype. My therapist was open and interested in my healing but somehow i was not motivated at all. My behaviour did not changed. I was even hard for me to continue therapy as i was always in hurry what's next. I was not ok with medication and I was doing research about this and found out that for some patient medication can work specifically who has "lower activity levels in the midbrain and the rostral anterior cingulate, areas that contain receptors for the neurotransmitter serotonin". (check after 29 minutes in this Stefan's interview ) I mean i believe i may be in this group coz my mood does not change rapidly and often times i have same mood all the time. I am still trying to find out more about his but thanks for your response.

This is sort of personal question but if you know something about it please respond! I have been in talk therapy for about 10 sessions but that did not work so i have been to psychiatrist now (from my health insurance). I just visited psychiatrist last week who prescribed me a drug named "VENLAFAXIN". He said this drug works best if you combine it with with talk therapy, exercises, etc (i.e. this drug is just 1/3 of whole equation according to him). He also said don't be afraid by internet horror stories and trust me and use exactly how i tell you (very low doses to high steadily) this will be very helpful for your depression (which i got 24 in Beck's depression inventory questions). What do you think about this? Suggestions would be very appreciated. Regards Bishal

Hi telsu, is there any freedomainradio meetup group in Finland? if you know Regards Bishal

Hello, how are you doing telsu! I am not a Finn but currently live in Finland in Helsinki too but cannot speak finnish language. I have been listening to Stef for more than a year and am interested in Ideas of free-society and peaceful parenting. Nice to know about your story, hope we can chat more Regards Bishal

Thats nice

I remember experts suggesting something like 3 years old. But what's the experience of experienced?

Hello, I think its more of a preference so i would like to ask: 1. What's the right age to separate children from parents bed to their own bed but in same room? 2. What about different room (child's own room), what's the appropriate age? Reply appreciated

More young the better Hello Markus, I am currently living in Finland. I am also interested in Libertarian Philosophy too. I hope we can chat in future. Regards Bishal

Hello there, I am living in Helsinki, Finland now i cannot speak Finnish . Also although English is not my mother tongue i am improving in it day. I am too curious about all the things you described. Lets chat in future.. Regards Bishal

Thanks all for recommendation and more recommendation is always appreciated

Hi Everyone, I just want recommendation about good books which i should not miss about freedom, economics, etc. In my place (i don´t even want to use my country name now a days) people have very low level understanding about philosophy, real economics, law and almost everything. Until i knew the idea about freedom, which was already put in place 300 years ago, i was shocked. How can a Idea this liberating this real and true be hidden form the people. Here, people are fan of Socialist or even Communist so the Mao Party won the election 5 years ago to write constitution but failed. There is going to be election again and people are never going to learn here Here, people still think politics is backbone of a society. You can just imagine this level of illiteracy. I think i will learn more and advocate the ideas of free society. But first i need to learn more for myself. So, anyone here can recommend books (from old days 18th century to modern days) about freedom which i especially should read for the complete idea about what i am talking about or the author i need to know who helped for the cause of freedom? Regards Bishal

Why don't you read Stefan's book "Practical Anarchy"? There it is explained, not as a facts but logically about the capitalist idea in more detail.

You tell me how he is my master? The burden of proof is unto you. Thats what i want to clear it to you. Someone seems to your my master but comparing anything logically there is no difference. And history of mankind is simple, we reject emperors, kings, totatitairan rulers to relitavely less government. Why not go further, why not evolve!

Hahahaa.. Yeah right there.. Show me evidence that i am a slave of my president or the president is my master?

Coz you say "You simply cannot claim to know as fact, something that doesn't exist. Just like believing in God, Anarchy is merely a religious belief so far. It wants to be real, but it hasn't become real. It can't. It goes against nature. " You try to discredit other ideas by simply saying its religious. We come to beleive in government by life long indoctrination from religious and political instutution. So when you say its not natural whay don´t you learn yourself if we humans are evolved to be ruled by some humans with same biological, psycological, menatal and physical capacity. When i say i am your ruler your master do you accept that or whats wrong with that?

I am not explaining free market as a fact when you read it carefully as I am examining both options (negative and positive) senarios. But here I am just putting facts about what hapens when government is incharge and we can tract what happen with relitavely freerer market in past (not totally free but more free then ever). Please read carefully. For you if i say i am against slavary and i will not compromise against it. This is religious position for you. If i say i cannot compromise my morality this is extreme position for you. Future solution is not up to me, a single guy, I am not here to suggest some solution as fact and tell you to believe in me (its just imigination of positive outcome as you imagine negative outcome and i am not claiming u to be religious with not agreeing with me). I am simply rejecting the current affairs and can prove you government is bad indeed immoral. And there is a moral way to solve complex social problem then to just write laws and be a never ending parasite.

Let me try to briefly explain this. Rulers and Owners are two different thing. Rulers who claim monoply on power and thinksthey have the responsiblity to develop their nation. To do this they rulers must come with free market ideas. When free market ideas are implemented people start to grow in wellness. Some good Entreperneurs do relitavely better and accumulate wealth and in overall economy grows highly. Then the rulers want to regulate commerce (just for the money they can get from business) to justify this they need to use poor's name, national security issues, environment, bulding infrastructures. So for big government, which are inefficient and often unnecessary, cannot have whole money needed to built infrastructures, pay welfare, etc. so thry must loan it from business savings i.e. from rich which you know almost no country will be able to pay back its debt. Then the debt should be paid anyway in coming future. When time to pay comes, government should make deal since state cannot pay it back and cannot just say no i will not pay (then, economic collapse in inevitable. Rich moves out of their country, stops business, total collapse in economy) which governments clearly know so both parties must make a deal which incluses: more or full monopoly to the creditors, leaving some sector totally for private (like money supply) or some countries resources to be transferred in private hands. This will make the creditors, the Owners of that country. It is due to government who asks for loans from rich peoples in the first place to bribe its citizens with roads and welfare that the private will easily take over. But when there is no central power to capture, this is when there is free flow of every information without restrictions, whwnever the rich try to take over the prices of their product rises thus any other can compete with them. When they try to take over the cost of their product must increase which opens the path for competetion so either they should reduce the costs or lose market share and lose wealth. Which forces the rich to take care of only what they are best at, serving customers. Just note that out of 100 biggest companies in past i think now there are less then 5 today. So economic power is same with political power. Ok lets take the extreme impossible case that economic power try to create political power in absence of State and achieved it. But hey its going to be same as todays Government. Lets just try to free people totally and if majority of people thinks its bad, the political power can always be back to where it was. Its a long process of understanding and realizing and i am still in my way Knowing all the healthy nature of Free market it wins government coercion with long shot. So why not give free society a chance.

Yeah only if there exists a government a power centre.

So what, we are living in similar state which you think it will be there, which you are wildly guessing even though the trend and the historical facts does not hint that. But state came in existence not by money but by indoctrination. There are very poor states with government. I understand money makes government powerful but Don´t mix economy with Politics as if they are same thing.

Simply, he works with feelings more than facts and oo oo if name of poor comes in discussion I, Mr: Noam Chomsky, am dead socialist.

Hello Everyone, This is kind of survey which i want to conduct here to know what do you think about it. As we all can understand that the true socialist are the one who advocaes free society ideas which increases the well being of a society and an individual. I always feel that the one who destroyes society (those human ownwers and controllers) hijacked that name because its simply so powerful word (as people just go for the name as you know, The feeling like socialist cannot be against society, No!). Too much is too much the one who destroyes society says they are socialist and use that name to bribe citizens. I just think, as it is justified in some way , why not use that powerful name and go counter with those rulers and owners of our society who use name just to convience and win the election. I think as we the advocates of free society are real social reformer why not use the name SOCIALIST and i think its even easy to explain your ideas coz you are clear from first. I am not trying to play with people's ignorance and win an election but just use that name to educate Anarchist or free people ideas. What you guys think?