grithin

Consequent to never finding anyone who understood the constitution well, I've created a site to help destroy some misconstructions of thought about it: https://constitutionalists.club/

This book: https://www.amazon.com/Tragedy-Hope-History-World-Time/dp/094500110X Societies, brotherhoods, corporations make long term plans. These tend to be excluded from the common teaching of history leaving the naive graduate of the mind that things just happened.

Go read Tragedy and Hope. Apparently there are managed efforts to take down the US. Taking down the US is not for regression, but for replacement with countries that follow more controllable/socialist models. The trending reaction of self benefit (make no efforts towards improving society but rather towards self and family surviving) is probably the situation described behind "the only thing it takes for evil to flourish". This isn't some "The Postman" society rises from the embers fantasy. It's an endgame, your lineage won't continue.

What insanity causes one to think otherwise?

With "Modern Money Mechanics", an understanding of the primary mechanisms have been available for a very long time.

Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch.

[disparaging remark] The reason the debt can't maintain was illustrated for decades by a guy who came out with "the mathematically perfected economy". It's based on the obvious nature of paying debt back with more debt (fed system) leads to an ever increasing interest portion, which eventually stifles out business activities. This, however, is naive - not taking into consideration negative interest rates or QEs or etc. The notion debt unsustainability is equivalent to human unsustainability is similarly principally wrong. It would require that production capacity were optimal, that unknowable and/or long term factors were priced in (land degradation from farming), and that debt backed payments were rationally priced. If the IMF creates a giant debt by manipulating the government in Jamaica into debt terms, does that giant debt reflect unsustainability of humans? PS: These damned public schools do such horrible jobs with economic, and to top it off we keep importing idiots - it's almost as if a widening high/low class disparity were intended.

2. people tend to fail to recognize one of the principle themes of The Wealth of Nations, and that is the natural formation of monopolies and cartels, and the prevention of abhorrent ones being one of the key reasons for government. Anarcho Capitalism is naive to this pattern. 3. Haha. I missed the opportunity - that's delightfully humorous. Go read Tragedy and Hope or listen to Alan Watt.

"Follow" is hardly worth anything. Donate or spread (I do both). And, if you don't have any money, perhaps go work at McDonalds (their working environment is probably cramped enough for you). The depth of corruption in the education system is not that important. For the people that care, the fruit it bears is evidence enough for there being an issue. And, if your intent is to spread info to alert others, there is plenty of information on the surface without the need to determine the in depth connections. If the issue is a matter of identifying corrupt politicians, well, that is done easily enough by just looking at how the vote. So, I assume the interest here is a personal itch that serves little public interest.

Unless the skirmish comes to you, the tentacles aren't worth fighting - rather attack the head. To my knowledge, the best avenue for this has been Judicial Watch, of which, I stay amazed at how little coverage they get by so called liberty movement heads. Separately, the way to go about defeating the education cartel would be through decentralized education, perhaps started as homeschooler resources. If you are interested in particular entanglements, see https://littlesis.org/

Depends on how many layers of separation that you need to consider helping a murderer moral. You could consider paying tax as contributory to the dollar value which enables the military through funding. And, then, apart from the layers of separation consideration, there's the greater good consideration. Perhaps you should consider that, with all the hot air the liberty movements produces, it was the military that saved us from a dark era signaled by Hilary.

Indeed, in my seeking humor your post did go over head. Perhaps if I had read your response to the OP I'd had known that you were playing the psychologist and had a vested interest. And, perhaps there is a deeper reason for the nightmare, but it is some times the case that chemical imbalances owing to diet in combination with stress are sufficient to cause issues. But, I suppose I have found my comedy after all with "Secondly, would you be inclined to stick with the dentist that recommends such an approach?" - all yours.

Pain killers (NSAIDS in general) have multiple potential negative effects, especially depending upon your genes. Have you tried electroshock therapy? Personally, I find sucking on ghost pepper powder sufficient for removing attention from minor pain annoyances - you'll have the added benefit of increased blood flow to the gums. Most dentists are horrible. For more than a decade studies have been around that show baking soda based toothpaste works better than fluoride, and yet, I haven't encountered a single normal dentists who knew this. Fortunately, market demand has led to a new set of dentists called biological dentists. Unfortunately, they are rather pricey.

Take a TENS device and apply it to your frontal lobes. Or, try pruriens (general neural chemical plant based supplemental), 5-htp (serotonin), theanine (anxiety), melatonin (sleep) [but only after trying the lobot... electro therapy]

No. ASVAB correlation would put it somewhere above 140, but I know someone else who supposedly also was in the 99 percentile, and I estimated her IQ around 125-135. Also, I've encountered plenty of brain damage since then accumulating in a general decrease of 30% in multiple metrics (typing, n-back, etc).

Stick with alex jones, he's been the most constant. Lack of energy is usual a consequence of low mitochondrial output (small mitochondria), you should exercise regularly. Maybe sign up for antifa and get in some cardio - probably could find plenty of traumatized people there to talk with.

<pre> {_} | /*\ | /_*_\ |120 Your IQ must be above this high to go on this ride {('o')} |--- C{{([^*^])}}D | [ * ] | / Y \ | _\__|__/_ | (___/ \___) | </pre>

The reality is, peoples' fantasies about freedom generally are far removed from reality. There are a lot of places you can go, away from civilization, where mostly no one will bother you. Some chose to go into the jungle in places like Belize, and they find, eventually, despite being in the middle of no where, the government can eventually ruin your life. Plenty of cases in China where infrastructure projects ruined "goat herders" lives. Some chose islands (henderson island, pitcairn, robinson crusoe island), but these peoples' access to civilization is at the pleasure of a larger government (the queen, chile, etc), which could change its mind at a whim. And, if you go completely away from civilization, you'll probably find life made miserable by otherwise treatable ailments. "global power is on a decentralising trend" The smaller and less powerful the sovereign entity is (country), the easier it is to control, and that there are a lot of them doesn't indicate decentralization. "The EU was basically all of their chips," Nonsense, and I'm afraid you know very little about the cartels of power if you think this. "They can't even defend their own borders." Quite an uninformed, dare I say ignorant, opinion. To choose not to is different than to not have the ability to.

Amusingly, after helping write the FISA memo, Gowdy announces he will no longer contend for congress, and says the Russia investigation should continue ( ) What would you guess this is a response to: 1. threats of assassination 2. threats of revealing of illicit history 3. preemptory tactic to avoid the above whilst already having let loose the material of importance 4. a new form of the star trek ear based mind control bug (or some similar technique or technology effecting the same) 5. a fabrication of person (synthesized imagery and audio, or perhaps that was Racheal Maddow in more makeup than usual) 6. there is actually more material to the Russia investigation (none of the items he mentions seemed worthy to cause an investigation) than my peripheral attention has alerted me to

The issue with public education being a matter of it's origin and pattern being that of to spread statist propaganda and generate cogs. There is plenty of potential in publicly available education programs - especially of the automated sort, but I haven't seen a natural rate of progress in this area - in fact, I've seen a regression in this area, which leads me to think there's an effort against the progress of public education (and, I expect asian countries are not as subject to this counter production, but are generally less potentially speedy in development of this area). Further, as a matter of rating a country's freedom index, you might consider the high degree of leftism in college professors or those otherwise submerged in intellectual pursuits, and perhaps a better gauge is average IQ in combination with level of free enterprise (reduces number of laws on books and reduces ad hoc administration) In regards to the various items garrett mentioned, what is on the books is often much different that the implementation. China has some great property laws/taxes until you find the actual implementation is what you'd expect from a communist country (it's yours until we say otherwise). And places like panama have great gun laws, unless you are an immigrant (partly because of the US history in panama). Then you might consider something like the moral tendencies of the people and find the results of the ultimatum game, and find paraguay is the best in that regard, but then you might also find how much some rather nasty elites have invested in paraguay, and how nasty the government there is in regards to collusion. Not only that the on book rules are different, and that the caveats can compromise the deal, from my previous programmatic analysis 10 years ago of places to live based on a variety of factors, places (specifically states in the US) change significantly. Louisiana, for instance, passed a law outlawing cash resale. Globalism (global serfdom) is a funded global campaign, and no population is naturally immune to it. Further, no organized collection of beta males (ex, free state project of new hampshire (or, just libertarians in general)) can reverse its progress. Your best chance is in the US, and is as a billionaire with connections to the military industrial complex. Or, perhaps, like me, you'll just resign to the secondary desires of making tons of money and strangling hobos.

The economy.

I suspect you have edited your main post since I am not seeing the statement which prompted me to suspect you failed to understand that an excess to select groups has been useful to civilization. This failure to understand the previous utility to civilization was my original concern. But, separately, "Beyond the point of not enough" is not addressing the principle of why a priest class has, in the past, evolved civilization. The ability to expend excess towards uncertain endeavors provides the potential for unusual advancement. And, if you were to apply this today, you would see this similarly applies, but now to corporations like space-x. No. I just understand it as a more general principle.

The second comparison is faulty in two ways: 1. a citizen would not necessarily see it as competition, since the citizen would be getting his UBI regardless (much like citizens don't see inflation as taxation). 2. the notion of a threat to the economy should already be acknowledged if it is expected a citizen will oppose immigration, unless we are to think a single level of separation (miscellaneous welfare vs UBI) is currently preventing the citizen from acknowledging that threat. On the first point, we'd first have to assume that the extra time would be spent towards an understanding of economics (more UBI out means more inflation means lower dollar value which means you get less value from your own UBI) and towards political action, instead of the various forms of entertainment. From my observations of people who get extra time, I don't think extra time would lead to these activities. But, say extra time did lead to these activities. From what I've seen, more time does not necessarily increase the depth of self-interested action, but only the breadth. And so, you'd get something like movements to increase the UBI (similar to movements to increase the minimum wage).

Listening to a bit of Alex Jones' show from yesterday, he takes on the view he often does, that of corruption of innocence, that Trump was fooled by those desiring overthrow of Assad, including McCain. This being wrong, however, this spawned an idea. If you observe the previous meeting Trump had with Saudi Arabia, you'd either come to the conclusion that either the Saudi's thought Trump was ignorant about their desire to overthrow Assad having nothing to do with false claimed atrocities, or that Trump was not in outright opposition to overthrowing Assad, despite those atrocities being falsely attributed and staged. Now, the Arab Spring, from the outset, was to any reasonably discerning and informed mind, a construction and not a evolution of rage. This, to me, was apparent in 2011, when Tarpley visited the various countries and confirmed it as a construction. The notion that Trump does not know that previous chemical attacks in Syria were false flag events (despite the white house seemingly releasing a statement to the effect of knowing this in just the past week), and coming to the conclusion that Trump thinks this present chemical attack was the Assad regime, is insane - but, you often get a mixed bag with Alex Jones and other Christians. Instead, we either have a diminution of power of Trump, wherein, perhaps, the deep state told him he has X amount of time to play around at the start of his presidency, and that time has passed (which would make sense given Trump's statement of regret about his efforts towards health care instead of taxes (which presumes either regret upon timing (April or the breaking of congress), or upon future inability)), or this is an agreement between Trump and the McCain faction to allow passage of either health care reform or tax reform or both.

The first "over simplified" was in regards to #2 (and that's not to say there aren't more efficient mechanisms than general excess to provide the innovation that such leisure has provided in the past), and the second was upon "I, an individual man, abjure my natural right to challenge other individuals to natural duel -- a natural right enjoyed by the males of all sexual species. I will also come to the defense of the rights recognized as legitimate by this company." - where instead, societies are upon functional practices ingrained through cultures stemming from necessities and morals, and don't have the hard points of "will defend" or "will not inner-compete", which I suspect might be mentioned by you owing to either that general notion (will defence) from "natural law" or from your suggested ant book on eusocial evolution. I hadn't seen this particular response of yours, only the one on, go read "The Social Conquest of Earth". I'm afraid the book did not improve my knowledge of how things have progressed since it seems to be for those who have somehow taken the notion that evolution worked upon projections of outcomes by individuals instead of the correct notion, which, to my knowledge, was first formerly presented and accepted by Ilya Romanovich Prigogine, that systems progress in a manner of accumulating persistence, and, in context, this means that a system, including both the individual as a system or a group of individuals as a system, will progress if their traits fit that particular situation in the time.