aviet

Tucker ascended to boss-level over the election period. He's been hovering around in the area between FOX News and Infowars for a while. What's happening is that those who were previously constrained by the stangleholds of 'professionalism' and political correctness have had the snow plowed from in front of them by the likes of Stefan, Alex Jones, Watson, McInnes and others. The paradigm has shifted to a considerable extent, but to a greater extent the perceptions of what the paradigm is has normalised more to what people actually think, as opposed to what they were told to think. Tucker has both shifted his range of acceptability to such things as going on Alex Jones, who he previously thought was insane, but has also slipped into the new space of popular political incorrectness that was only created by people with more balls, like Stefan, Jones et. al., who had the courage to go past the peer pressure and go with facts when doing so lead to mass condemnation and villainisation. Thus far only two people have ascended to god-tier: Trump Farage

These huge databases already exist. At some point I'd like to do a write-up on the data industry and how to keep your data from being collated. If you live in The West, and maybe even if you don't, you're almost definitely in such a database. When you open a bank account, all the personal details you give them are sent to credit check agencies. They have your real time bank balance, your income, your debt, your debt restructuring, debt terms. This data has been bound up with multiple different sources to create tables with 100s of columns. They've been merged with voter files, which contain political affiliation and race. They've been bound with religious donations to give religion; mobile phone databases, land line databases, family size, all manner of magazine subscription lists, immigration records, emails, whether you have a swimming pool When you buy anything like mobile phone contracts, insurance, credit; in that big contact you sign but don't read they tell you in jargon that pretty much everything they have on you will be for sale. It's a big industry that is worth billions. I have one UK database that is for one year (2013). It has 18 million entries, some duplicates, with all manner of details and the name of the company of who sold them. Some of the companies: TESCO, EE, ASDA, Virgin, Aviva, Direct Line. If you value your privacy, the biggest mistake you can make is signing up for one of these loyalty points cards. When you do that, these companies sell your entire purchase history and bind it up to the above mentioned huge databases to create detailed profiles on you. In the last few years a new bumper crop of data has arisen - social media, in particularly LinkedIn, who openly sell all your data to companies who bind it up to the above data. Large companies will have databases with thousands of fields of info on you. And this is only the legal side. Who knows what else may go on. And on top of that you have the dark side of hackers who are increasingly getting hold of this info. I was able to bind up about half of the Ashley Madison dump, which includes sexual perversions, to credit rating data with income, address, family size, debt and so on. It's not my intention to use it this way, but it's a motherload of blackmail info. One of the highest value hacked data sets is medical records. For blackmail. Some of the best simple things you can do to maintain privacy: Set up a catch all email on a domain and use a unique email for every site <- use this when you have to give out an address Get an account with Scryptmail and use a unique email for each site <- use this when you are signing up for sites anonymously, like forums Don't maintain accounts with large stores like Walmart, Sainsbury's etc. Don't use loyalty cards More advanced: Get a second passport, often quite easy if you have some foreign ancestry: Indian, Serbian, Polish, Armenian, Germany - among others. Keep your money in a backwater like Saint Vincent, Seychelles, or at least Hong Kong or Seychelles Buy a house in an obscure country So, most large companies have these databases and they use them in part as you suggest, to establish trust. And it's not really difficult to get access to them as a private citizen, especially if you live in the US when you can use sites like InstantCheckMate. In other countries you need to go through a PI. I don't think there is any need for such databases for what you suggest. In a much freer market we would have more cowboys/low quality setting up as the barrier to entry would be much lower. The result would be that people would have to be more diligent with their purchases, which I think is a good thing. Right now people expect to just fall back on the government or a bank if things don't go as planned. You may be more likely to get burnt, but that's life. With the level of regulation we have now, I've been burnt.

One thing we can say for certain is there will be Nye warming tonight. Nice and cosy. Not heard the, "If the science is clear, what percentage of warming is caused by humans? 100%? 79.4?" line before. Will add that to my repertoire.

There is a girl in my town who is about 24 and recently had a baby with a much older guy. I think he's in his forties and he is notoriously untrustworthy among other things. He has about 4-5 children with different women. Before hooking up with this guy another guy was interested in her. His lot in life is no better than the father of her child, but doesn't have the father's baseless confidence and bad boy appeal. She cast this potential suitor away. Today I heard the girl say, "I am over my fuckboi phase. I'm looking for a gentleman." This girl has had a terrible life and I feel it is going to get much worse. When she was 20, she was with another guy who was about 38. I only met him once, during which time he made an argument on the imperative of hitting your children. She was also abused. As the conversation went on, it is obvious that she is clueless that her sexual market value has just gone through the floor. She was completely oblivious of the ideas that go through many men's minds when they come across a single mother - that is that they are an easy target for a liaison. Personally, I am not interested in a single mother, but if I was not better principled, I'm sure it's something I would entertain as a short sojourn. I've also heard on this forum, a guy who was pursuing a single mother, but essentially knew he was not planning on sticking around long and tried to cover up to himself his true intentions. I couldn't find any studies that shed light on this. A search mainly threw up articles on why all single mothers are virtuous, powerful and deserve a medal and are so unfortunate as having to navigate a maze of immature and stupid men. So, I am going anecdotal. How have you seen the romantic expectations of single mothers change over time? As an extra note, personally I think it's unlikely that a gentleman would be interested in a girl who had a fuckboi phase.

This is something I have bee thinking about for the past week; interested to here others thoughts and how this will pan out. Will the left be able re-align itself? Or will it continue its epic decline? The coalition of the left is failing all over the West. In Britain the coalition of the left (Labour) was formed out of a growing underclasses that arose from population growth, mechanisation and a squeeze on resources. It was a coalition of poor people who wanted a better life and wealthier people who believed they should get it. The Labour party used to be full of people whose primary concern was those who weren't so well off. It was diverse. It contained people from working-class backgrounds representing their area and peers coming down from their estates to (in their mind) help the little man. But over the past two decades the Labour Party in particular has been packed full of a narrow-band of MPs. They come from upper-middle to upper class backgrounds, often infused with a jot of champagne socialism. They go to top schools and Universities to study politics, history, art etc. Once out of University they typically go into academia, journalism or become a political aide. And thus, very few Labour MPs ever have a job facing the market their old constituents known nothing other. Their top concerns are things which are obscure and cater to a fairly fringe audience. Recently in the Labour leadership contest, both candidates went against numerous issues that are people's primary concerns and instead began championing obscure and unpopular causes like staying in the EU, banning men from standing in certain seats and fixing the immigration problem by spending more money on migrants. These are the problems of the Islington dinner party and are in so many cases against the wishes of Labour's former base. When the left do want to try and message the working class, they do it by covering things which people aren't too interested in like worker's rights and the environment. I've never heard any working-class people mention these issues. As a result the coalition of the left, formed by the poorer in society and better-off do-gooders is collapsing. The former and their concerns have been squeezed out of the party by privileged and disconnected accademics. As polled for years, the main concern in Britain is immigration, with a recent poll showing 40% of people think immigration is the number one issue. But for the most part, Labour has done it's best to say there is no problem and that anyone who think so is a bigot. Turns out a lot of former Labour voters are bigots, as they peeled off Labour for UKIP, even though UKIP is largely a carbon-copy of The Conservative backbenches that so many former Labour voters despise. This leads to another crux of the problem for the left. Many people voted Labour for decades on a fairly-single issue basis - that Labour were for the working class. Many of these people would not be considered right-wing on social issues like capital punishment, immigration etc. So as Labour deleted it's messaging and policy for the working-class, millions had no issue in common with Labour and promptly moved to UKIP, largely based on a single issue. This problem of left/right leanings among people whose primary issue is the working man has been addressed in Australia's Labour Party by having a left and right wing inside the party. Many other labour parties cannot bring themselves to even approach such an idea. And it's why they are slowly dying out. A narrow-band of idealogues have taken control of left-wing parties and trying to cram everyone into their small, unpopular tent. They are so disconnected that they look like they are prepared to continue on this path for decades. Good.

As an update to this, after being covered by The Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge and others, Alexa, which is a wholly owned subsidy of Jeff Bezos's Amazon, who owns the Washington Post and keeps their likely failing finances private, have blocked the list of countries showing that four sites: BBC Washington Post New York Times London Guardian get ~50% or more from China. They have also changed the country where the sites are most popular from China to the US, but it also looks like they have begun filtering out the Chinese traffic, as their Alexa ranks have begun to go sideways and come down in two cases. The Alexa rank listed on the site is a three-month average to the day, so will take three months to give a better idea of how far these sites traffic have really gone down. Soon they can take their place with the rest of the fake news, whose election cycle traffic boost was not enough, in almost all cases, to cover up a decline. Now the election cycle traffic has gone it's clear many fake news outlets have lost double-digit percentage points of traffic.

Brilliant. Only an academic who has never had to respond to anything could come up with such a bird brain statement. "create equal opportunity for everyone" I forgot that part of capitalism. I must have missed it when I skipped over the social egalitarianism section in The Wealth of Nations. Capitalism is a system where the majority of production is held privately. The more that is held privately, the more capitalist the system is. Not being able to bequest a single possession after you die would be less capitalist. Sounds more like burke studies than philosophy.

There are people who are ultra-submissive on one end and ultra-demanding on the other. I like my relationships to be in the equilibrium of reciprocity and respect. I've experienced both relationships where a submissive attaches and a demander imposes themselves. In the case of a submissive, themes of attachment can be bathing in your status, safety... and with a demander: propping up their status and also safety. Thus there is reciprocity, but the respect is one way. Both are using each other as tools to achieve subconscious goals. But this is not the strongest basis of a relationship as it is based on primordial rather than philosophical motives. I think even in the case of a woman who suffers from extreme domestic violence from her husband that both have a use for each other. They are just based on unhealthy drives that many people do not have. Self-destruction is a common expression of humans and animals. Staying in an abusive relationship if a form of self-destruction, where the abuser meets the needs of the self deprecating victim. I don't want to treat people as tools, or to be treated as a tool. If I enter into a relationship where there is not reciprocity and respect I get out. Relationships are based on reciprocity. If both partners are not getting something it will likely break-down. I don't know if Stef has covered this specifically, but I remember in a video he asked questions to the affect of: Would you marry a hideously ugly, manic, depressed woman out of empathy for her? Would you sleep with any old pot-belly schmoe who rolls up because you feel sorry for them? Would you give up your business you spent ten years to build to a leftist thug because you wanted them to have a chance? Although there may be some circumstances in which those may be seen as reciprocal, they generally won't be seen as so by people in those positions. Many people endeavoring into relationships don't really make there needs known. Does the trophy wife who dumps the businessman who loses it all tell her husband throughout the relationship that is what she would do in those circumstances? Or does the wealthy businessman who dumps his aging wife tell her he will do that all throughout the relationship? The idea that you will enter into a relationship and give the other person a blank cheque (metaphor) to do whatever they want with is masochistic, but so is the idea that they are just a tool. If these are peoples' drives, we won't have a society.

grithin, are you pulling a Pepe at the Taj?

Trump Records?

First, on the business front the key is to keep at it. I was able to build a viable SEO business from zero in about six months. But I had quite a bit of prior experience; even with that it took time and I could have been doing a lot more if I had clients who knew what I could do. On cold calling. It's difficult and something I would rather avoid. But my old company did it and the results were very low. You'd be lucky to get one client from a whole day of calling and that is with 'professional' cold callers doing it. The best clients always came from word of mouth.You could try going to those business meetups that I think you've mentioned. One of my friends, who give no shits, had success with trying to sell businesses face to face by going round businesses. He built about half of his clients like this. Very forward. Once when cast out of reception, he climbed through a window into a meeting room where a meeting was in session and immediately began pitching. Give it time. For both the businesses I started on my own, it took 6 months for the first one and maybe one year for the second one to get up to a decent to good income. As fro going to meetups. Take advantage of living in The Pitt. I live in a really rural area and if there is anything relevant round here to me I'm pretty sure it would be mainly 60+ year old people there. You could also take the initiative to start an FDR or Proud Boys group. Here's an idea I want to follow through on, when I have time to break from work: Make a list of your positives and negatives, e.g. Positive: I am pretty good looking I have a good income Negatives: Low social interaction Bad wardrobe Bit flabby Unorganised with my cleaning Then come up with a game plan to get rid of the negatives.

I keep an eye on the Alexa rank of news sites. Since the election I have noticed three sites: The New York Times, Washington Post and London Guardian have been receiving massive amounts of traffic from China, according to Alexa. See: WaPo (59% Chinese traffic) NYT (49% Chinese traffic) Guardian (57% Chinese traffic) This unexpected amount of Chinese traffic was not there previously. Going back to October 2016, Alexa showed only 2.6% of The Washington Post's traffic coming from China, a swing of over 56%. Given that Chinese traffic now accounts for ~50% or more of their Alexa rank, it is likely this Chinese traffic is covering up a considerable decline in real traffic. Other aggregators such as Similar Web show no sign of Chinese traffic. Quantcast gives estimates of actual number of traffic; using those estimates as a gauge would give these three sites somewhere in the region of 30-40 million unique Chinese visitors, which would mean virtually every fairly competent English-speaking in the country is reading all three sites. Alexa Rank is calculated from over 25,000 toolbars installed on million of computers.

Do you homeschool? If so what's it like in your area?

Welcome, Waw, something to aspire to.

When I was in school, the most popular book with the boys was this now forgotten classic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonfleet Others: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Day_of_the_Triffids https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tripods http://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/58319/smith-the-story-of-a-pickpocket-by-leon-garfield/9781590176757/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Farseer_Trilogy(and the ensuing two trilogies)

I want to start up a side-project that will aggregate companies who enact SJW policies, make statements and also highlight other opportunities like when Trump tweeted about various companies and their stocks subsequently went down. The purpose will be for people to short the companies. But I don't know if I will have time to get to do anything on it this year and that has been so many shorting opportunities since 8 Nov. Holding site: http://marketsafe.space/

There have been a lot of names suggested to describe the types of groups you cover here: The regressive left The control left The radical left The left Leftists Liberals / libtards Progressives Communists Socialists Social justice warriors Antifa But I think you've come up with a more encompassing title here, "These Fuckers".

Many Islamists and leftists would be gleeful to hear you are withdrawing yourself from society, leaving them to fill the void with their collectivism and supremacy. One of the reasons things that have got so bad is because people who opposed the anti-civilisation left have been shut up with the sword of bigotry hanging over their head; used to threaten friendship, jobs and reputations. The way I see it, we've got a window that will span for approximately the rest of our lives to push back against various forces. We've had major victories in 2015 and 2016. Now is the time to walk against the wind, risk all your friendships, go where you see danger.

There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Reince is like a gobblin lord, guiding Trump around, showing him how to open all the doors. MAGA 3X - 12 more years. How are people's leftists friends taking this?

It's not in a foreign language, but it's the best I can think of: http://www.theapricity.com/forum/forum.php

Hi, I asked a similar question about 6 months ago: https://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/47553-answering-why-i-have-never-been-in-a-relationship/ There were some pretty good responses. To your one query about how to answer why you've not been in a relationship. My conclusion on this is to just be open about it. You can somewhat sweeten that fact with the truth that you have been working on your career. I'm in the same position as you on this. I've been working 60-80 hours / week pretty solidly for 5 years and am going to look more into relationships soon. If a woman discards you simply because you haven't put part of your body in a woman and ignores any strong traits you may have, then she would probably be the type to cast you off for an upgrade at any opportunity. I would recommend giving online dating a go, at least just to get your feet wet. I tried this about six months ago. It is frustrating. There are a lot of chancers - people will message you and then quickly drop off. I was lucky that I was contacted by a girl who had set her profile to private and we had a lot of common interests. She was more mature and serious and messaged me. Our online conversation was huge and we met, which went well. But it seems for whatever reason they didn't like me as after a few messages more I never heard from them again. This rejection in itself was a good learning experience and I now feel more confident of ploughing on through the further inevitable rejections. I think I'm going to be rejected at least three more times before I have an opportunity; and I am kind of relishing it - the pain, the reality. I think our big problem, that you hit on, is our lack of ability to be charming, flirty etc. and that we are more suitable for Christian women, but we are caught in between the space of modernity and Christianity, the genuine benefits of both. As for not finding women who are of a similar mindset, with similar interests. I think it's important to temper such expectations. If your benchmark is FDR, you are going to have a hard time finding anyone. I think it's better to look for markers that suggest a woman could be receptive to such ideas. Someone made a good post recently on this, but I don't remember what it was. For example, the woman I went on a date with was a Catholic who goes to church every week but is of the cultural Christian ilk. I'd describe her as being quite heavily latently left and she did make a statement along the lines of disliking capitalism. But there was certainly a lot of room for conversion. A lot of women are latently left in a very whishy-washy way. Their leanings are very casual and typically based on a drip-drip of background inputs and not strongly formulated philosophies. If you don't already listen, I'd recommend The Gavin McInnes Show. Along with Trump, he's been quite instrumental in changing my mentality into one that is more conducive to success in these areas.

Have a look at the sources here: http://www.conservapedia.com/Atheism_and_charity

It's not really possible to identify fake news in many cases, as so much news is based on word of mouth essentially. My approach is that I soak up a lot of news and don't put the narrative and facts on a pedestal. Everything is suspect, but in its sum I allow it to form a general picture of the landscape and where we are going. In the current age I don't think its possible to fake trends if you consume a lot of news. I also like to consume a lot of statistics, from surveys, national statistics institutes, academics and so on. Most news sources just shitpost. The aim isn't to inform, but rather to push the needle of society into a direction you want it to go.

Has anyone got this woman's number? If so PM me.

Did you go to a Proud Boys meeting? Some people still haven't got the message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWX1SKncyOA ------ I'd add Norway, Switzerland, Greenland, Iceland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, South Korea and Chile as "The Hard West". And I'd throw out South Africa and possibly Lithuania. Croatia is borderline. Though I think a gradation approach is best. As I see it there is now The West and there is Islam. Anywhere does doesn't have a significant influence from Islam is The West to various gradations. For me the epicenter of The West is Hong Kong.