Sabras

I smell a call incoming.

That would be brutal.

Lethal force was on my mind when talking about murder. What about physical punishment in form of a beating? Would that be considered as a restitution even if the person would not want to be subjected to it? Sure negotiation would be the way to go, but some may not wish to negotiation and instead take 'justice' into their own hands. Could this ever be considered moral?

Czech sounding like Polish.... Czech - I have an idea / Polish - I have a seizure Czech - Broken / Polish - Fucked (sexually) Czech - Place of abode / Polish - Cow field Czech - Constellation / Polish - *something*poop Czech - Girl / Polish - Hooker Czech - Tampons / Polish - Ass bombs

Hey, I was discussing punishment and morality in Ancap society with my buddy. We begun to wonder whether it is ALWAYS immoral to initiate force against another individual. For example, if a person commits theft/murder/rape/assault, is it wrong to initiate force against that person after they have finished committing the act of aggression (I understand that if someone steals from you, you have every right to take that thing back, even if it involves force). If someone murders a member of my family is it immoral to seek retribution in form of initiating force against that person? I think that a lot of people would want to initiate force against that person under such circumstances, I think it's not entirely unexpected reaction, but is such thinking/emotional response compatible with Ancap philosophy or is such a person not considered an Anarcho-Capitalist? In summary: Is it always immoral to initiate force against another individual? Are there any exceptions? Can a person who wants or does initiate force against another individual still be considered an Anarcho-Capitalist, or is that incompatible with Ancap philosophy? Also, I want to throw one more question: Is punishment in Ancap society delivered only in form of social/economic ostracism as well as voluntary 'labour'?

Sorry, the first message was an accident. I do speak Polish, aye. However, as I said above, some words do differ a lot, for example in my language the poster reads 'seven ships'.

Not Polish. Czech is quite similar to Polish but it does have certain 'funny' words which although sound similar to Polish words, mean totally different things.

http://www.cambridgebrainsciences.com/ You can take tests in order to assess your memory, reasoning, concentration and planning. I'm scoring top points in reasoning and concentration, memory however is a big problem for me. Let me know how you guys do! P.s - anyone know whether there is a way to improve short/long term memory? Always been struggling with it.

Amen

Don't tease me! Can you confirm that it is happening? I would like to see plenty of you too Mike!

For me it would be the ultimate Anarchogasm seeing the FDR team out there on the streets.

In the most recent conversation with Bill Whittle I heard Stefan saying something about doing some 'man on the street stuff'. I would absolutely LOVE if Stefan did some interviews etc. outdoors, Kokesh style kinda' thing!!!

Some disturbing tweets indeed https://img.sauf.ca/pictures/2015-12-29/c12fc3b2278596da4a26edd4a41f3373.pdf His twitter account appears to be down. http://pastebin.com/yk8bgru5 more tweets

Houston, we don't have a problem.

All we would hear is "Look Stefan, I am a smart guy, I'm not a bigot, I know what is right, I know what to do to make America great again!"

Leyton

"You have enemies? Good. That means that you've stood up for something, sometime in your life" - Chuchrill

Hey Jacob, I'm Jakub, welcome to the forum!

I do not know why your post got down voted, these are some excellent questions, some of which I came across on my path of becoming pro-gun. I recall Stefan saying "You are afraid of them having guns, I am afraid of them having armies". These are very hard question to answer in the context of the current society. In the free society however; 1. - Why would there be people wanting to engage in a terrorism acts in a free society which does not intervene or engage in coercion with other geographical areas? 2. - Do these people not deserve to own a weapon? Are they less worthy of having the ability to defend themselves? I personally think that these people should be taken care of by their families and friends. 3. - I don't see a reason for restricting it. Not many people will be able to own a nuke. And hey, if they do, social and economic ostracism, who would want to engage and do business with these people (unless they are company which is hired to defend the free society). These are just some of my thoughts, stolen from Stefan of course and other wonderful people of FDR, all credit goes out to them

In this case spreading political goals like democracy, is the same as spreading sharia law.

Yes ifs and buts always exist. But if someone is coming at you with a knife, something tells me you'll be able to tell that the person is a threat.

I wish it was this easy. Gun at least gives a person a fighting chance.

I think that is a very good definition, I'll use it from now on. I still think it would apply to yesterday's incident.

I used this definition ' the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims.' The suspect shouted "this is for Syria" which leads me to believe that it was politically motivated since, around two days ago, UK government agreed to send RAF jets to Syria. I guess if the rape had a political aspect, then yes, it would be terrorism. However, If I am wrong you guys are more than welcome to correct me! We might be neighbours then!

Let's imagine that a law-abiding citizen had a gun.