Matthew, the word "mistake" jumped out at you, it did not have the same provocative effect on me. I find it more productive to seek out solutions to concerns, rather than dissect the language used to present such a concern; or certainly that was my initial reaction in this case. Ultimately, if the word "mistake" was used, more support should have been offered to question it from a technical perspective. You are correct in that finding (or so I "think" rather than "feel" you are correct)
As to your comments insisting that someone who lacks detail or evident support for a statement or hypothesis is a "dick", is somewhat amusing. Following your logic, do you proclaim that all persons presenting a question or concern for which they cannot resolve themselves is a "Dick?" Doesn't that undermine all use of diagnostic or legal discovery ,troubleshooting, scientific method, etc.?