Fashus Maximus

Well, I don't know that there is any evidence for God's intentions specifically for Japhethites. All I know is that the non-Jewish Israelites scoured across Europe and mixed with the Japhethites, which makes us - the offspring - God's chosen people. Marx was Jewish and Adam Smith was Scottish. Regardless, the sources you provided claim that these 2 were created by their "lackeys" but then specify that they were either influenced by said lackey, or the lackey was influenced by them. E.g. Bentham influenced Marx, Smith influenced Lord Shelburne. Quite the stretch to say that they were created by oligarchs. I don't see what any of this has to do with British aristocrats manipulating Jews, as I see no evidence of that. If anything, your 2nd article completely disproves this claim; by 1900, most of the aristocracy was of Jewish lineage. Sure, but they are disproportionately represented in production, as opposed to being government monopolist middle-men for other producers. In production, the interactions is mostly or entirely voluntary, depending on how involved the government is. Clients get to refuse the purchase, they have a say on the price, etc. With something like an insurance company, you don't get to choose whether or not you get car insurance. You either get it, or men with guns will come kidnap you for the government. You have little say on the price because you can't shop across states. You have even less say on the price because government licenses keep out competition. This is why I'm angered when I hear a Jew bragging about how their success is totally due to their verbal ability. They can brag all they want, but at the end of the day their refusal to engage us in the free market is an admission on their part that they are incapable of succeeding in a voluntary setting.

The white race matters to racially conscious whites. As for the universe, it is obviously not a sentient being to which anything can matter to, so I'm assuming you don't mean universe literally. What exactly do you mean by Universe? People in general? I must say, your angle on Marx and Smith is new to me. What do you mean the oligarchy created them? How and who exactly did that? Also, my argument to support Jews being on the top of the pyramid (of the rent-seeking economy) is the "follow the money" principle. With that in mind, how do you explain that the modern state of affairs uniquely benefits wealthy Jews at the expense of Europeans? If Europeans were on top of this pyramid, would it not be Jews who were losing out? By Faustian, I assume mean: "made or done for present gain without regard for future cost or consequences" (Merriam-Webster) Do you mean to say that the Alt Right is focused on short-term gain without regard for future consequences?

The Jewish Catholic Church was indeed sinful when it did so. So, I guess we can agree with my argument that the (valid) problems you raise are not Christian in nature?

I asked for which war you're referring to. Also, the Inquisition happened at a time when Christianity was already the dominant religion. So the Inquisitions cannot be an example of Christianity spreading. I'll also point out that the Catholic Church was at this time heavily subverted by crypto-Jews, who played a major role in the Catholic / Orthodox split to begin with, among other subversive tactics. Catholicism was considered heresy by Orthos and their Jewish practices were denounced by Martin Luther who served as an instigator of the greater reformation movement. That's why protestants now rely on the Bible so heavily, it's due to the distrust of those who claimed to represent God's will and used their credibility for rent-seeking and profiteering. "He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her." - Jesus Do you hold the same opinions as you did when you were 5? 10? 15? I would never bother debating an opinion you held then, but don't hold now. Why is it that you argue against an old passage, that was retestified by a later passage? You are arguing against an opinion that is not held by any Christian book, person or institution. I most certainly do not get the picture.

I'm missing the link between Republicans and pedophiles. The Christian God's values are universally preferable. Trying to argue against them inherently validates them. Regarding tribalism, what tribal allegiance do Christians have anymore? Their only allegiance is to Jews, (aka Churchianity). Had they preserved their tribal instincts, they would know that Judah (thus his lineage the Jews) was cursed and cast out, which is why they had their own kingdom. The remaining tribes of Israel mixed with the greater Japhethites (Indo-Europeans), and hence, the british would never have given Israel to anyone if they were loyal to their tribe. The historical evidence does not support your claim of tribalism. Much of our problems today could have been avoided if we put our people first.

Deus Vult. I'm missing what is immoral about cleansing the earth from the spawn of Satan. You're making the age-old mistake of applying rational thought to that which requires faith (the suspension of rational thought). That's what doesn't make sense, here. You cannot have an argument about faith without faith. So if you have a faith-based argument to make, I'm all ears. Otherwise, any argument made against God's actions is always trumped by a simple answer: faith. And what did I say that was not biblical?

While I agree with most of your posts, I don't think the above statement is totally accurate. There are negative externalities that are not induced by violating property, such as atmospheric pollution. The atmosphere cannot be privatized. Also, degenerate markets such as the trade of voluntary servants, whore-ism, sorcery, predatory lending, and witchcraft do not violate private property and yet also have negative externalities. This is my problem with those who profess AnCap. It is totally focused on individual property and does not address the issue of collective resources that cannot be privatized. You cannot have a voluntary society that ignores collective problems because collective problems will ultimately result in very private costs for the members of the community. Hence, it will be mathematically impossible to sustain.

Welfare may skew the incentives in favor of single motherhood. However, blacks have always been pre-disposed for R-selected behavior. Those stats are about the black men they actually found and served with divorce notices. In the majority of cases, those black men go off-the-grid; they pay nothing. Only 10.6% of Vitenam vets are black. 88.6% are white. What am I projecting? I didn't say it's about white men. I said it's about the openly stated goal of Jewish communists to eradicate the white race. Half the equation is sending white men to die in Jewish wars. The other half is convincing impressionable young white women that it is empowering to be a whore, and they've got nothing to worry about: when they hit 30yo and 2+ partners, they will totally be able to get with a 6 ft tall, James Bond billionaire with abs who is sane and won't cheat on them. No one is trying to eradicate any other race. It's only whites that have to deal with this stuff. For the record: - I'm a man - I'm anti-feminist - I'm anti-Jewish-Wars - I'm pro-family - I'm anti-divorce - I'm anti-generational-debt - I'm against the U.S. ever fighting in WWI, WWII. My family was destroyed because of WWII. My great-grandfathers fought for the Axis and died fighting the Brits and Soviets in defense of the Persian Corridor and the invasion of Gilan. Only the last generation of my family has been able to regain affluence, and that is very recently. - I'm anti-leftist-indoctrination Basically: I'm Alt Right. Sounds like you agree with this view. I literally don't understand this last quote of yours.

What is the fog covering up? You say the real power is legacy media, and educational institutions. Would you say that the financial system falls into that category? Military industrial complex? Lobbies? Rent-seekers? Do you think that running or owning these institutions relies on IQ? If that were so, why would they rely on expensive licenses to keep out competition, when high IQ is already a rarity? Perhaps it is not IQ - but rather - personal connections / nepotism that puts you in charge of these institutions? Do you think that these nepotists pick high IQ folks to run these institutions when they have no one to compete with and when their performance has usually little to no relationship to their income? Or perhaps, they prefer to put their own buddies in charge? So let's go back to the fog analogy. What is the fog covering up? Take a look at these nepotists. You notice anything about them? A pattern? Let's name some names, shall we? Perhaps you'll notice a pattern: Rothschild, Rockefeller, Warburg, Kissinger, Soros, Volcker, Summer, Blankfein, Greenspan, Yellen, Bernanke, Strauss-Kahn, Cohen, Lehmann, Goldman, Sachs, Lerner, Zuckerberg, Schmidt, Weinstein, Hertzel, Luxemberg, Rosenthal, Sackler, Lenin, Trotsky, Masaryk, Juncker, Benesch, Seipel, Baker, Adenauer, Schuman, Schumer, Schwarzman, Bilderberg.... Institutions that rely on nepotism. Mostly run or owned by individuals from a single ethnicity with the highest ethnocentrism known to man, ever. Another coincidence: this ethnicity cannot be criticized. Another coincidence: their history is illegal to question. Another coincidence: it is illegal to boycott their host country. Another coincidence: they have been kicked out of over 100 countries. A couple flukes make a coincidence. Many coincidences make a pattern. How do we cut that fog? We either name the problem by its proper name, or we get out of the way of those who have the balls to do so, i.e. the Alt Right.

Those people were given warning after warning to cease their incestuous behaviors and witch practices. After generations of inbreeding, those "infants" you refer to were non-human satanic abominations, who were most likely in pain and illness from their genetic deformities. The flood, and any other Godly purification cleansed society from heretics, degenerates, and their likely-to-die-anyway offspring. In non-biblical terms, it is likely that the last generations had degenerated to a point where they were no longer a forward-thinking people. They failed to foresee the flood, or they failed to acknowledge the risk foretold by Noah, or they took too many witch potions (i.e. drugs / alcohol) to care.

The state is not run by voters. It is run by politicians and their bureaucrat underlings, which are mostly men. Male* lobbyists The answer to all of this becomes very clear when I re-write it as such: "Why is it that every politician that gets elected need to remove rights from white men and offer more rights to non-white women? Why are white men raped in non-white divorce courts? Why is it that when a non-white woman accuses a white man is automatically guilty without due process? Why is it that white men cant get child custody? Why do white men pay in the system and that it non-white women that benefits from this system? Why is it that white men are sent to die in stupid Jewish wars while non-white women stay home?" White politicians are disproportionately lobbied and funded by foreigners, and non-white politicians already have an in-group preference that is explicitly and openly anti-white. Those removal of rights disproportionately apply to white men to lower white birth rates (their openly stated goal). Also, those rights disproportionately benefit non-white women (again, foreign funding + in-group preference + open and explicit anti-white hatred / jealousy). You most certainly can criticize white women, especially if they are married or not feminists. You can find at least one thing to criticize about every group, without much backlash. The only group you cannot criticize whatsoever is Jews. While I do welcome counter-arguments, I don't think that simply assuming I haven't thought of my argument or assumption is a productive route to take.

I agree with the conclusion reached. But it hinges on the assumption that nations are illegitimate. Are you arguing in favor of devaluing nations? Peoples do have collective group interests...

What do you mean by: - deducing a nation? - denationalisation? - null-set states?

Because the state is run by men, and women naturally defer to men as problem-solvers; god bless her for that, that's wife material right there. Since private sector men have decided to sell their offspring down the drain and have allowed their kids to become cucky soy boys, they are biologically useless to women. The only other men to turn to is the government. Hence, government solutions.

I agree with everything said from the other users. However, I'd like to answer your question on programming, since no one really addressed this and I'm in the industry. Can you make a lot of money? Depends on the type of programming you do. It can range from 40k to 400k, and even more if you go the entrepreneurial route. Since you're starting from scratch, it'll take a lot of time before you make much. You'll probably start off doing some debugging, or some basic front end stuff, and you'll be competing with H1B foreigners. Imo, you'll be better off expanding your music business and use your web skills to help with your online presence.

I guess I don't understand the difference between creating and setting a result...

My opinions: I'm a huge fan of Combibars. You can get them from Peter Schiff's brokerage. What's so neat about them, is they fit into your wallet like a credit card, and you can break off little pieces as needed (like a chocolate bar). I personally dislike silver's volatility, but hey, the bar comes in gold or silver (and platinum??). I've heard Peter Schiff advise people to keep some on person, but mostly stashed. As for gold funds, they defeat the purpose since the gold will be inaccessible when the collapse happens.

@Gnostic Bishop I get that, but what I'm asking is which theistic laws of Christianity are you referring to? And which war are you referring to when you say Christianity was spread by the sword?

what in god's name are you referring to?

if you run the same deep neural network over a given dataset, you will get similar but different results. We can test this out by comparing the results' correlations to the data's labels, and what you find is for e.g. one time it will be .93, .94, .92, etc. There is a degree of randomness, so the programmer cannot possibly set up every result.

I think your statement would be more accurate in the context of K-selected peoples. Certain societies tend to be rather rapy...

By "is that a girl", I meant joe not you. Well, failed joke I guess

oh wow, I see what you're getting at. That sounds like a very interesting concept. Have you considered that maybe you can create it as a plugin for the FDR forum? I believe they are using CKEditor as the word processor, so I'd say add a tab to the bar, and run your plugin when clicked. Cuz that would definitely be more efficient than investing a lot of money to gain the user base that you already have right here...

Speaking of PUA, agreeing and amplifying, I see.... is that a girl lol?

I would agree with your reasoning under normal circumstances. However, the democrats - and non-whites - have already waged gene war on right-wingers, but more importantly whites. People have been waking up to the genocide that is being done unto us by those filthy savages that roam our streets, and they have mostly used the government to do it. You don't get to decide whether there will be war. You only get a vote, and so does your opponent. It only takes one side to want a war for there to be war. With that in mind, how can it be a violation of the NAP to pursue Jared Taylor's policy proposals in response to our genocide? Is it not virtuous to cleanse society from initiators of aggression? The founding fathers were explicitly white nationalists and would be rolling in their graves if they knew what became of their country. Government violence is already being used unto us to remove us from the gene pool, partly by reducing the freedom of whites to procreate. You can choose to let your people die gracefully if you wish, or defend yourself and your people by any means necessary, including but not limited to the use of government force. Jared Taylor and I know where we stand. EDIT: here is a fantastic source regarding white genocide (aka the Kalergi Plan).