AccuTron

Lately, I notice that all forum topics show on my latest Mac Safari as the original post, then a huge vertical blue bar, and no other text anywhere. This website is now unusable. I won't bother to look for a reply here since it wouldn't show. Blue bar is gone, or not.

A+B. This is very well established BY LEGITIMATE SCIENTISTS. And any fool can just look. Search climate fraud and spend your next hundred hours reading about illegal math, illegal physics, falsified data, money trail, etc.

"MGTOW is a product of men's tendency to hold grudges. As such, it is rabidly irrational." -- That is such reflex shaming tactic, based upon an opening statement which is untrue, that I am guessing Brainwright is a girl. If you are not a girl, BW, then you are a brainwashed mangina and really need to look into it. Seriously. I wonder how many MGTOW videos and comments you actually saw. Because your statement is so devoid of core understanding, that it is essentially fabrication. If you actually read the comment sections, you'd see many men, different ages, who simply saw with their own true eyes how very often and very severely men are destroyed by a woman with a mood, and chose to avoid women and avoid the problems, ya' can't hold a grudge if nothing happens in the first place. And the courts are bogus...now I'm just repeating the standard stuff, go watch the videos for better analysis. The TRUTH is that men have a tendency to honestly analyze -- something rare in females -- and we honestly see how dangerous and worse-than-worthless most women are. No woman commentator, or Brainwright him/herself, will speak of the elephant in the room: the women (large yet valid generalization) are crap, they are NOT attractive, NOT feminine, NOT very bright, NOT honest, and possibly NOT well behaved. So how do those female widespread (pun) traits supposedly originate with male grudge??? Victim blaming. Running with the pun, Caley is on target. It endlessly impresses me how many females don't understand that they are...girls. Squishy warm body parts, well behaved. Without that, women don't have any value, in fact it's negative value. Quote by Blonde In The Belly Of The Beast, look her up for image, she's the perfect out of the box porn toy, not a bitter spinster with persistent nose zits: "Modern women no longer have anything of value to offer men." Women aren't very interesting to talk to, very surface, run from uncomfy facts like roaches from a room light. Chronic liars. And can be lots of time, money, trouble, and THE MAJOR POINT OF MGTOW, the man's will and activities are blended and diluted with the female's, and while this may be a good thing, often it is not. I can cook and clean just fine by myself. The following instructions are fundamental for a woman's value, and can have other things added later if deserved, yet the core must first honestly be there: Give head, make sandwich, shut up. And keep yourself clean and healthy. --- Like those are bad things!!! In my senior citizen life, I've maybe met one woman who understood that. MGTOW men, thru sharing endless stories, tell so very much the same thing. "The juice isn't worth the squeeze" is practically a slogan. So how is it a "grudge" to see that the product offered for sale is worse than junk??? Saving my best shotgun for Camille: If you put that same question on many Youtube men's channels (Howard Dare, MGTOW Is Freedom, Sgt. Terence Pott at Redonkulas.com, and the under-appreciated brilliance of AngryMGTOW are good starts), you'd get a philosophy course provided by many men, far more than my overworked typing fingers can provide here. Actually try it. I will cover the most immediately obvious points: You, a girl, right up front, are asking for "strategies." Which is femalese for "manipulative techniques." What about the strategy of just being a good sexual servant and rip out of your brain with laser blasts any trace of entitlement? Oops, don't wanna mention that. Not like it's perfectly obvious or anything....It is clear that you are trying to weasel your way into a men's space, playing the innocent card, that it's really just about "that women can use to improve their lives and interactions with people (i.e. to keep men engaged honorably before they MGTOW) " I don't even know what that means. Not just because it's missing at least one verb. Actually, I, that is to say, we, DO know what it means. Improve their (women's) lives = but the heck with the men's lives? All about that girl greed? Interactions with people...a generic innocent glance to the side, oh it's just for the betterment of humanity, you know we women are so spiritual and all. WTF is engaged honorably before they (become) MGTOW? Do you mean "keep them bullshitted as long as possible before they come to the unmistakable conclusion that we belong in the dumpster"? As you would be told in any comments section: "What are you really doing here?" Girls, we are on to your shit, we tell each other, it's the internet age, and we know your brains better than you do. The ugly base truth of female nature has been let out of the bag, and it won't go back in, no matter how many times you try to innocently flutter your eyes.

" previously acting from a subconscious level but fairly harmless "...fairly harmless? Ask the divorce raped homeless men about that, plus many others, which you'll surely hear/see if you stay with the MGTOW men, and there are at least several to listen to with good value. As Meister said, I think you misunderstand. MGTOW is in large part about how women's minds work, as self defense. Like learning magician's tricks. We are on to the tricks. A woman using different tactics is still seen as a woman using tactics, just different ones. And we get better and better at spotting the false moments. Put in the hours. Howard Dare, MGTOW is Freedom, AngryMGTOW, Heartbern, just a few names.

Fear of posting bail bond.

Note my edit: "But friend zone HER. She will love you(r ability to do stuff for her) in no time!"

Also, were some of the unmarried men burdened with health issues that kept them at a disadvantage in dating and marriage? That would skew the data.

All crystal balls are inherently broken, there is no way to know what will happen in any of those situations. Which choice has your passion? Tho', caution there, passion may be emotional more than appreciative. The woman in Denver, I get the impression you are wanting a situation, and you are looking for a person to put next to you in the play-house family car. Being flippant a bit, asking if the tail is wagging the dog. Another consideration: if SHTF in some way, where will you be in the most resilient situation?

Your icon image is small and blurry, but you look like you are still young, 20-30's. Make a calendar note for ten years from now and see if you are then still baffled.

Back up to the starting line: all this alarmism was brought up to begin with by...drum roll... -falsified data -illegal math and physics --HUGE money trail So don't sweat (pun) any of it. The climate is doing what it always has. So are humans (see also "forked tongue").

Keep handy ripe bananas, also a palmful of mixed nuts and raisins together. They stave hunger very well for at least a half hour and are healthy face stuffing. I've moved much more plant based, and never have a grumble tummy. Don't forget that a glass of water also fills the belly awhile.

What are you saying? You don't see it????

This is a very important video. A number of victims are mentioned, for those of you thinking there are no known victims. Also, look at 27:38 in the video; compare to Imgur:

The speculation is by the Portuguese police investigator, and he put it rather bluntly in his report. You did read it, right? I think I put the link someplace above. And the near perfect match of two suspects descriptions with the Podesta brothers...that's two matches...and they were staying 1/3 mile away at the time, at the villa of a world class pedophile. That's a bit much on the innocent-coincidence scale. And by the way, the girl is dead, the police dogs found blood and cadaver scent in the parent's car, the apartment, the mother's pants. D..E..A...D. So no matter who did it, somebody did it. That's not speculation. The young child didn't spontaneously just up and die, putting her blood in spots on a wall. It seems that the brothers who are near spittin' images for two wanted posters, known to be in the area during the crime, staying at a veritable HQ of world class pedophilia, would be a darned good place to start looking. Then the aware citizen should ask why this is not being pursued. Red pill, dammit. I'm assuming you've not really delved into this. Basic Fact Number One: dispose of bodies; they have essentially unlimited and unchecked resources for this. Another Basic Fact Number One: It's easy to get children that no one will miss, won't leave a trail. Plenty of homeless, runaways, the usual, sourced from a slew of countries, including Haiti with orphans. Human trafficking is huge. And no, not completely suspect. Why would you say that? If there's a body found decomposing, it's after the fact, and any reports regarding the crime are completely suspect? How about check and verify the reports before dismissal. It's amazing that on this FDR forum, I cannot get traction by even one person as far as I can tell, who will state: "Yes, the wanted posters look very much like the Podesta brothers." There's a determination here to absolutely avoid the smoking gun evidence. Eyewitness descriptions for Wanted posters are evidence. The Portuguese police inspector's conclusions are evidence. Alefantis denying he has a basement, yet referencing it as a storage area in a food article, that is evidence. MSM shills couldn't do a better job. That is most curious.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio: Obama’s Birth Certificate is Forgery Press Conference 12/15/16 - YouTube It started as an effort to quash once and for all the "birther" claims, by a Obama voter no less, and the evidence points unavoidably to fraud. This is a press conference by a Sheriff in Phoenix explaining step by step what happened. Anyone who's done computer graphics can follow this easily. The bad guys got sloppy and the good guys found it...accidentally. Yet the good guys pursued it, and that's what makes them good. A quick check of MSM shows white wash, dismissive, avoided facts...the usual.

“I think I made a grave mistake.” I don’t think so. As to your gambling/woman example, you clearly already understand the concept of sources of behavior, will probably continue to learn, and I sense that your moral code is strong enough to be used as a successful reference. Just to mention in passing. As to your reference to a true self, I should think that if there was a thing, it would be constantly morphing. “I’m going through a critical time in my maturity. ” More than you know. Our brains at about age two, and in late teens, are piling on the neurons, taking in our learning of the world. Think about the “terrible twos.” It’s very confusing, and the following two years or so our brains do lots of sorting and trimming. Thus, you are now in the temporal place where your brain is the most overloaded and confused, just anyway. You feel Freak Out, yet you might try to feel Faith, that if you don’t mortally screw up, your brain, on it’s own, will sort out much and you should feel better over many months or a few years. Feeling great is not guaranteed, the world is really screwed up. But you will be feeling clearer. I’ve never heard of anyone who has opened their mind later wanting to go back to ignorance. Maybe they might miss the cozy feeling if they had that. I grew up with a family swimming pool. I noticed that Nature came up with lots of water beetles and frogs, yet to my knowledge not one other species developed “the Australian Crawl.” I thought, the heck with that, I’m going to be an underwater swimmer. In recent (senior citizen!) years I had a 25-meter swimming pool almost all to myself, and I tried to see how far I could go underwater on one breath. Taking my time, on the third try, I did the full length. A few meters shy, I developed that feeling some of you may know: “If you don’t go up for air right now, you are going to die!” Logically, I knew that wasn’t true, it was only more seconds that I needed, my blood O2 could do that, so I consciously, willfully, almost without effort, instructed myself to ignore the alarm. The alarm disappeared. (First time I tried that, it surprised me how easy it was.) It was only an alarm, like a flashing light, not the thing itself. (I’m pointing out a delay between alarm and actual disaster, what alarms are supposed to do, I’m not saying that alarms are to be ignored.) Notice this: If the “you are going to die right now, for real” alarm can be turned off, what could you do with the alarm for “I’m feeling very, very, uncomfortable”? The alarm is not the thing itself. As you deal with…good luck to all of us…life on the outside, and your internal evaluations, it’s good to know something of the wiring you are working with. A control room operator is going to be much more effective if the operator has looked at wiring diagrams and opened a few equipment panels. You as operator of your own brain now know, from the swimming example, that it is possible to turn off the darned alarm horn while the lights on the panel get figured out. Just turning off the horn makes things feel better. Here’s another thing that might help. Stick with it, it seems to wander at first— If you look at our brains in rough cross section from the side, you will see an evolutionary hierarchy, of stacked brain layers: —Fishy brain-stem wiggles, eats, evades, perhaps builds, mates. —Amphibian/reptilian brain grows on top. A very successful additional set of executable codes towards the same basic goals as fish. —Proto-mammal to mammal. Here’s the fun part. Being nocturnal, our tiny ancestors further developed olfactory circuits, yet another set of code — again, towards the same basic goals of life — which would eventually become what we call the limbic system. Mammals developed what we call feelings. If we smell fresh coffee or bread or fudge brownies or whatever does it for you, you feel good, you are drawn towards this life necessity. It could also apply to other necessities such as good shelter, flora, water, etc. Plus one extra feeling…Fear. Otherwise our ancestors would have been eaten while gloating in feel-good (political metaphor begging it’s own thread). Fear has evasive neuro-wiring, plus maybe some hormones, that are slightly faster than already good reptile lunges. Fear is meant to keep us alive. After that, we get the cortex stuff, values and what not. These are very generalized statements, all layers interconnect all over the place with other layers. The layers that got there first have the strongest connections vs layers that came later. Thus, we have the common situation where logic and values say don’t do something, yet we have this huge urge to do the thing. It makes no sense, this ancient neuro-wiring meant to keep us alive will be destructive in our modern, non-natural world. The conflict we feel is the result of that wiring imbalance. The enlightened control room operator will understand that, and if real danger is not present, will practice, practice, practice, the art of turning off the alarm horn. It can be done. Having considered the above, do you still feel as strongly that this is true?: “It's these emotions that reflect my desires, that is, the true self.” Are you maybe less sure that this is true? (Remember, I could free will override the urge to breathe!): “Rather than accepting that I have no free will over these emotions,” Good luck on your flight deck.

Great job Isaac, on the letter you wrote. It is full of important logical construct, with an eye towards historical reality and honest recognition of implications. Thus, it's chance of honest response had a sparrow's chance of penetrating bullet-proof glass beak first. The O-response is pure boilerplate smokescreen. It is glaring for what it doesn't say. Almost every sentence is cheerleading avoidance. For example, suggesting that career success is dependent on kindergarten. I'd think a more secure childhood would be the better approach. The unspoken: -- Where teachers with unions will be employed, and the children are further removed from family structure, and big surprise, earlier introduction to various propaganda.

Madeleine McCann, as explained earlier this thread.

I'm confused. Did you start eating the fish/oil and taking calcium at the same time, or were you already taking the fish, and added the calcium later? What variable do you think made the difference?

If the FBI poster doesn't establish it for you, then what would it take???

Such as Alefantis(sp?) recently saying there is no basement in the shop, yet an old cuisine article has him saying they store their own sauce in the basement? Or that the property is described as 2 story yet it's only one level at street level? These were in a recent YouTube, but the YouTubes are being banned; that itself ought to tell you something. And there is still a Herculean effort in this FDR thread to completely ignore the wanted photos for the McCann girl murder being dead ringers for the Podesta brothers. And the singer at a private party meandering about child sex, how is it that this is STILL being ignored in this thread? Rosencrantz you are really really really being dishonest in trying to imply one element of the logo is all there is, you must know that. In one hand sweep, you dismissed hours of video evidence. HOURS of EVIDENCE. Define it how you wish, it's in your face in huge amounts. And what's all this bonehead discussion of the definition of code? What a fabulous way to distract attention from the EVIDENCE. The words are known code, and emails are sprinkled with them, making no sense if not in code. The various logo images contain known code -- it's in the frickin' FBI poster! -- and paintings contain known code. And you people worry about the linguistic origins. Yeesh.

You take YouTube titles seriously? HE is pointing out what THEY do. You seem to have a penchant for missing the message and attacking the messenger. In Forum Tradition, it's about here that someone mentions Stef's Bomb In The Brain series. "Evidence" means things to evaluate. There is a huge tangle of things to evaluate. And you STILL are declining to answer any of my challenges. Evidence is to examine in detail, not dismiss en masse with a hand wave. C'mon Neeel, I'm daring you, gauntlet time: find me another pizza image that can make five fairly symmetrical* human figures simply by adding five dots. Or even one figure! (*'Cause if it's too symmetrical, it's a giveaway, right?) What's this made up stuff? The emails peppered with code words, the use of known pedo symbols, the singer explicitly mentioning child sex (you still avoid this one), the bathrooms behind secret panels (avoided), these are made up??? Podesta's hacked FB images with ancient murderous symbolism on his hand...somebody made that up? How about Trump's jab at Hillary? Trump Mic Drop on Haiti - YouTube Tell me what you think he meant, and explain Hillary's reaction. Do so with accepting pizzagate, and do so by denying pizzagate. And don't run away from the question this time. Here's a form for you to fill in: Pizzagate false-- Trump's remark meant: Hillary's facial reaction is because: Pizzagate true-- Trump's remark meant: Hillary's facial reaction is because: By the way, in at least one of those emails, Haitian food is mentioned. I don't even know what Haitian real food is. In code, yawn are we paying attention yet, it means Haitian children -- this is in emails with other known code words. B.Clinton DOJ human trafficking division appointee Andrew Kline's name is on the building purchase as the purchasing agent, which you did see, because it's in the videos. -- This is which of these: "conjecture, guesswork, made up stuff, leaps of faith, seeing things that arent there, and outright lies" This item alone is a red flag big enough to blot out the sun. Please explain it if pizzagate is false. "Well, the guy supposed to find human traffickers bought a building...by chance...that seems to be a central point in human trafficking." I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell to you. And dangit, stop avoiding the specific questions! (I guess it was my leap of faith that I was done here.)

My post disappeared again. What's with that? Neeel, does noticing the arrow in the FedEx logo, on one's own, make them an employee of FedEx? Do police detectives discover clues because they are criminals? Or do they simply know how to look? I think the word here is disingenuous. You completely avoided any of my challenges, such as making any other pizza image suddenly have five human figures. That's dishonest. Cheese pizza being a relatively new "code" and not meaning what you say it means --uh huh, and you avoid the Podesta references, AGAIN -- what did HE mean? And what does new have to do with it? You ever see anyone using a NEW consumer product? Works fine, doesn't it? James alefantis not actually being an anagram --I don't even know what you mean. It sounds like "I like children" in French. It does. Really. Tenuous connections between symbols. conjecture, supposition --The FBI doesn't think so. Blatantly altered or made up images --the blatant is already there; I just put a light on it. Still challenging you to find even one other example where a few dots can suddenly make several people images in a row. And explain why the cheese is dripping from the crust edge, and where in your life have you seen cheese drip in a pattern? If you use 0 as the "crust edge", 1 as the length of the middle sections of each "person", and 2 as the length of the "legs" then the data from left to right is: 2120 2120 2120 2120 2120 2, then the image stops. And you don't see a pattern? "You dont think that people mistaking a paediatrician for a paedophile, just because of the WORD, and going to attack him, is stupid , and incredibly worrying? Ok then" --I never said that. Of course it's stupid, so stupid it's not worth mentioning. Was that pediatrician in any way connected to any other evidence? I'm guessing not. Is pizzagate a huge tangle of evidence? Yes. The info is there. I'm done here.

But make it a pattern easy on cuttlefish.