AccuTron

Your first point above: I keep reminding myself of that. I don't have many public/private contacts to test...having had any makes me want to avoid all...and I keep my cool, and realize the operative word is EXIT...and later I want to scream. Your second point, and OP too: Thanks for letting me know I'm not the only one who gets so rattled.

I was going to knee-jerk about how global warming fraud totally occupies the White House and so much more, there thus being already a strong tendency to ignore evidence unless it's tampered with usefully, and how is that going to change...then I see that Tyson is talking to Gore about politics in science!!!! That's like discussing The Jewish Question with Goebells. Another set of clay feet!! Gotta be blunt here: How the heck does Tyson not know it's all fraud? You just look, just start anywhere, and it's like Niagara Falls of information, how does he miss that? I painfully listened to snippets of the audio, and it's mindless prattle; they all assume the lies are true, then proceed from that point, total cheerleaders, I did not hear anyone presenting honest facts or questions. A total case of kiss the hog's belly. The clay feet list is growing: Tyson, M.Kaku, S.Hawking. AGW and Fukushima are the most amazingly useful litmus tests. Speaking of which, are you monitoring this go-to site re Fukushima?: ENENews.com – Energy News Recent post from above link: — TEPCO President: We lied about meltdowns, “It was a cover-up… This is a grave issue” — “It’s an unprecedented nuclear disaster… about as bad as it gets” —

Dude! YOU don't cause me distress...distress was from B. Gates, voted many years in a row the person most likely to be the anti-christ, a title only now under challenge by A.Gore....

What??? As an Amiga owner of many years (A2000,A3000), and realllly upset about what happened (B.Gates gets no holiday cards from me), I don't recall virus issues. Do you have links?

Population control is called having fewer babies. Given that the better off breed less and have little incentive, I can't imagine tons of Bangladeshi being shipped to Jupiter's moon. Which would immediately be replaced on Earth by new Bangladeshi. I don't see any reduction in environmental pressures, since the Earth's population will still be orders of magnitude beyond any Moon Towns. Maybe all that will come to pass, but it's hard to see the appeal unless it's total ugly down here, and it seems better by comparison. Free Soylent Green with each one way ticket!

If I'm in danger to begin with, I want to know the problem will be solved, not just delayed. Somebody psycho enough to threaten me once, if knocked down, may just plot more carefully next time. I don't carry weapons per se, don't need to, but if in danger, I'll look for the take down strike, the heck with what it breaks. The perp doesn't like that, don't be a perp to begin with.

Looks are surface and deceptive. Also niceness. I speak from experience re good looking intelligent medical females. Try asking her about these links, and see what is really inside. (They are mostly from, or added to, FDR forums elsewhere.) Notice that we are talking non-trivially about patient harm and death. Does she engage, or retreat?: A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated w... : Journal of Patient Safety Why Most Published Research Findings Are False Can we believe any medical research – at all? | Dr. Malcolm Kendrick Flawed medical research may be ruining your health -- Health & Wellness -- Sott.net Editors, Publishers, Impact Factors, and Reprint Income These two are about medical fraud from the current/former senior editor of Lancet, the top British medical journal. ‎www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736%2815%2960696-1.pdf Editor In Chief Of World’s Best Known Medical Journal: Half Of All The Literature Is False | Collective-Evolution If you really want to know a person, attempt to show them links about medical fraud or global warming fraud (many links in FDR). Blatant, can't miss it. See what kind of looks you get for being honest.

Flaw? Not seeing one per se. As dsayers noted the State is not mentioned. Yet I think the State is heavily implied, as being so pervasive that it's taken for granted, as what makes everything else that happens possible in the first place.

Women are products of millions of years of evolution overall, and tens of thousands as primates. A woman is a set of reproductive organs in a carrying case. All females of any (vertebrate) species are just that, any current egos aside. The top evolutionary priority is to save these organs and keep them operating. In the natural world, anything new is dangerous: it's a poisonous plant, a hidden predator, bad water, unsteady ground -- the correct answer in all natural cases is to "run away like a girl." Thus, when women encounter something new, they freak. (Not talking about a fad.) Likewise, to be ostracized in nature is to die. Starvation, exposure, predation. (Also aggression by other women for the act of breaking rank, probably with similar roots.) For a woman to break rank with other women is life-threatening at a genetic level. In the natural world, this worked, but with our vast civilized capacity for fraud, this is disaster. Women in general will not listen to anything challenging, it threatens them, and I doubt if they even know why. At a genetic level, it would express as the feeling of "well, it's just bad, it just is." I've run into what this cartoon displays approaching 100%, not to mention Dilbert is only about things that resonate widely: Imgur: Dilbert cartoon

How is vertical leap measured, relative to what point of the body? Are we talking about a running jump?

Some years back, I was curious about the Communist theme song, The International, it's origins, etc. I found a page...dead link now...with many versions listed. Of note: various Soviet orchestral versions, whereby Moscow always had the best performance. A Russian a cappella version. A Tuvan throat singing version... Tuvan - Tuvan Internationale by Huun Huur Tu - YouTube And these rock versions by Tang Dynasty. Internationale - Tang Dynasty - YouTube Chinese Internationale - Rock version by Tang Dynasty - YouTube (same music, different video) This reminds me of Queen, in it's rock style with choir. The rhythms and choir make me imagine a video, seen from next to a railroad track, in arid terrain, featuring a completely bronze steam locomotive, with the band playing on a flatcar, and svelte Chinese flying Valkyries dressed in long black with silver trim, flying in front. The train suddenly is in a football stadium, steaming but moving slow, and other flatcars full of international people step off onto the field, and they all move to the far goal line, standing toes on the line, all singing, and the very last sounds of the music are the Valkyries sighing as they lightly land in the goal zone.

Some eyebrow raisers, including avoiding legumes?? I like sunflower kernels, will look into it...anyone already know of anything? A number of other things I agreed with. I use body wash and shampoo, usually the inexpensive lines at Safeway. I have no reason to think I'm hormonally compromised, good health overall. Those things rinse off pretty quickly, and I wonder how trivial it might be....except that...some years ago, maybe a dozen, I read a story in Science News. There was a doctor, S. Florida I think, who had a woman bring in her son of about age 12, who was growing breasts, whatever that word is. According to the article, once male breasts have developed, if the cause stops, the breasts will remain as is. That was the always expected result. The doctor asked the mother about exposures to various things. One thing caught his attention, either because of specific knowledge, or a hunch, or some clue. The boy was being daily body rubbed by his mother with lavender oil. (Sounds like another forum thread about that.) The doctor suggested ceasing that, and to the great surprise of all, the breasts actually shrunk. Ever since I read that, I am wary of lavender oil. So I take the other suggestions of the article with a bit more curiosity than if I hadn't read that Science News report.

The anger at Trump rallies is from dishonest arrogant brats who hate the idea of anyone who will ask honest questions, because they'd have to give up their crushes on Hillary and that guy in the White House who is Satan's bedroom buddy.

My compliments, aviet, on your full, honest, and clear writing. You will surely get lots of good insight from others here. One thing caught my eye, along with a strong suspicion overall. This: "6) As mentioned above, I do not know what to say to a woman when I am approached. The last time I was approached for sex, they asked me maybe ten time, held my hand and rubbed themselves against me. I was not able to directly tell them I didn't want to have sex with them, that I didn't not want to hold their hand and I did not want them to rub themselves against me." I think she was not rubbing against you, but against your wallet. Your intuition, which is the sum of all the circuits in your head that aren't tangled with emotions or desires or expectations, tells you quite clearly "Vamoose, Satan!" or words to that effect, re these women. These low rent women in quality would likely be be very high rent in practice. You may be making a string of wise decisions, but don't yet know it. If so, your conscious self might perceive it as personal weakness, but it ain't. As to what to say, "No thank you" would be a good place to start. Simple, direct, honest. Be prepared for pouty fits in some cases, but just walk away. I picture Clint Eastwood in spaghetti westerns: basically polite, few words, good posture, doesn't lose his cool, can just look away.

>Firstly Markus, congrats on your openness. Also a recognition that there's a bit of time lag here in responding to points you may have already addressed. I'm convinced that therapy can only be useful for me if there exists an actual emotional bond between the therapist and the client. It relates to my main problem which is betrayal by my mother, >I think not. You're looking for something in a place that it has no business being, like you were looking for breast milk from her. An emotional bond with a therapist shouldn't exist in a two way direction; I think it's well known that clients will want to bond but it should not be reciprocated. She's not your good mother substitute, your good mother will never exist. Which is the sad fact to accept. Not to steal your spotlight here, but your mother reminds me of my own. My last therapist was a conventional CBT practitioner with 45min sessions, a woman in her late 40s with a conventional family who was rather reticent about opening herself up to me and being vulnerable. It was more of a conventional therapist-client relationship, it seemed. I didn't find it a very efficient way for her to help me. >She was probably being reticent because it was bad practice, not vulnerability. What do you mean by efficient? Things take time, maybe weeks before you notice something. Gotta plot and clear the ground before the first parts of the building go up. Forming emotional bonds with women as partners is fucking impossible. So if someone, a therapist like her seems to put forth the effort to help me, I find myself wanting to trust the process even if it seems weird at times. But still, I don't know, I'm not sure and that's why I asked all of your help. I'm pretty much open to anything at the moment. >Your openness and your desire to learn are very strong and attractive features. (Women, help me out here.) You may also not have encountered someone to properly bond with, it's not a flippant thing, the odds are low. So don't cut yourself short on being a gardener, if you haven't yet found good soil. Sort of a zen thing, put offhand, but maybe you need to discover a self that doesn't need emotional attachment, to clear your mind at a foundational level. Not saying it's easy, nor that we don't need these things, just saying it's a practice practice practice that may clean out some corners of your mind. All projects go better when the workspace is first cleared.

"insomnia, brain fog, fatigue, even slight bouts of depression/anxiety" plus "I'm sitting at multiple access PCs, monitoring ~10 screens. When I cover overtime, that becomes quite a lot of butt time" I see 2+2. Castus, it sounds like your job is wearing you out, nothing to do with hormones. I'd be cautious about testing from an "anti-aging" doc; I wonder how accurate or info complete that would be. Another case of "Bucks For Beliefs"? You are already correctly suspicious of modern medicine in general. Anti-aging sounds like buzz words; why not just "be healthy"? I don't know the guy or gal, but my inner scam alert is itching. (Wuzzums, you are comparing apples and oranges; the two hormone sets are not the same. I am not an expert in the field, yet I never heard of a female going into violent rages from taking hormones.) I'm wondering if you are really experiencing mistaken psychological distress at not being manly enough, or some such phrasing, a common and almost required condition these days. (See about one quarter of all forum posts about that!) Trying for respectful humor here: You remind me of a government program -- forget the obvious likely sources of a problem, pick something else to point at, set up a program which will cause endless cash flow and some sort of dependency. I don't know your specifics of course, but this is my reaction.

I notice the UN goal 13 is to support the largest fraud in history, AGW, and 13.b specifically indoctrinates the young and marginalized, thereby creating an army of believers in something that doesn't exist yet will give them a True Believer motivation. Yay, UN.

What was the particular cinematic trauma? I haven't been to movies in ages, so fill me in with needed details.

The editing, images, etc., come together well. I'm only half way thru, gonna do some chores and come back, yet I'm struck by how powerful the piece is. Technically sophisticated, it delivers at gut level. All of which is only possible because it strongly resonates with a great deal of frustrated upset. I wonder if this video will end up as an historical marker, when viewed a few years from now.

Very good article. I feel like it presented the perfect and truthful focus of the core problem. Thanks for link, will be sharing it.

Oh yeah, I missed that one. I think my mind would be mush after that. I don't think we can process that much information at once.

Sounds way too complicated for a valid or effective therapist relationship. I mean, you're telling us your problems (I say this in an off hand conversational way) and they're mostly about your therapist! (I realize that you were only focusing on this one issue.) This image comes to my mind: Sometimes a vacuum cleaner will snag some long loose threads from someplace, and they wrap around the roller brush, tight between the bristles. We don't even know they're there until there's enough to cause a problem, and we have to meticulously unwind the whole mess. My non-professional opinion is to find a therapist with fewer loose threads. I go to my car mechanic because he does good work, not because I have a crush on him. It sounds like you might want to date her? In which case, can't be a therapist at the same time. And for dating, the defensive reactions seem to be red flags. And of course, yawn, that eternal question, "Why (really) are you a single mother?" And a therapist too, suspicious. You are both in ages, male and female specific, where hormones that make us go panting after someone are at their peak. Clear thinking is greatly reduced. Asking a therapist about her family life, other than the most general question, nor maybe even that, sounds out of bounds. Not for being unethical, but for being confusing. It's backwards of why you are there, it's you and not her, and seems like boundaries are muddled.

You're not an inner bully. I had a violent neighbor who wanted to badly hurt anyone he could get to, that's a bully. You are mentally and accurately targeting the real bullies, you simply and justly want them to stop being evil, and they won't do it on their own, so the frankly most effective result would be to crack their heads open. Your brain is being quite reasonable at that level, it's how you'd treat a mosquito or rabid animal. This is no longer a societal option, plus or minus the value of that, so it's internalized, and worse, reversed direction back at you. (Like a trapped light beam, it can't escape your skull so it reflects and refracts back inside.) Don't blame yourself, write out a long list of others to blame, including probably almost anyone you can think of in "a position of trust." That might have it's own discovered value, who else was supporting your abuse in a secondary or passive role? You might also try a dart board with their pictures on it -- or maybe just their names on slips of paper. It might get aggression out (at least letting off a bit). Even more interesting, it might show that your hand hesitates to throw at some images, causing terrible aim, which could be good beginning insight. (Get a wide backdrop to protect your wall!) I wrote elsewhere about the Japanese study of pistol shooting, Kenjuu Do; a hand dart is similar. Zen benefits of Kenjuudo, The Way Of The (target pistol) - Self Knowledge - Freedomain Radio Message Board. Each shot reveals the mind of the shooter, if they have the sense to be aware, the target is secondary. Partly because my air pistol has a huge charging and trigger force, I limit myself to five darts per set. That's muscles, but it's mind too -- five darts is a sample of your thinking, more is maybe wallowing in it, and losing the original freshness of insight. Several five dart sets per day is mental exercise. You may eventually stop using the images entirely. “The shooting practitioner does not look at the target for the result of his or her practice, but inward, for the target is not a target – it is a mirror. And if the heart is right, each shot clears away some more of the obstacles clouding the vision of one’s true nature.” —Zen in the art of pistol shooting website

Thanks for the video. Timely for me, will listen again.

Wait, wait, I just heard this on Car Talk, will look it up again. It's the 8:36 minute segment in show #1621. Power = work/time Knowledge = power Knowledge = work/time Time = money Knowledge = work/money Money = work/knowledge Therefore: As knowledge approaches zero, money approaches infinity.