Crallask

I wuz tryin ta think of a good response to ur question mate and thn I see the vid 4:20 min long and rembered what I weeded to do.

Ol' Stef is amazing at many things. Video games are not one of them (Thankfully)

Why do you want to propose a stance called "There's no free will" and then not have it discussed? Do you think that's a minor or irrelevant part of your speculation?

Perhaps the saddest part about these types of things to me is that there's no other guys around the ones paying that stop them and say, "Dude - seriously? The fuck are you doing? She's not your wife, she's not your friend, you ain't getting nothing from her. Zip the wallet and stop this nonsense."

The biggest con I can think of is the rate at which the technology is advancing. Just look at this: http://carbon3d.com/

If she was capable of that then her son wouldn't have been there in the first place.

Tom Woods Peter Schiff School Sucks Podcast Karen Straughman/Girl writes what Bitcointalk SexLiesandAnarchy

Hello, Hello - dear FDR members. Some of you may remember that none too long ago we had a bi-weekly skype meetup for not only discussing important personal issues in place of the retracted live shows but also making various phallic jokes. I feel there was an overwhelmingly positive response to that buuuut that it feel just short of retaining interesting. Personally, I'd like to rekindle that fire for we did have some truly unique and meaningful discussions wherein we surpassed some of the confines of Stef's own show. For all interested in such a proposal, I'd like to know how the community favors the idea of setting up a custom mumble server with various chat rooms devoted to different topics which anyone could access whenever they found favorable vs restarting the old Skype group. While I've used skype the most and it's clearly the most popular VOIP software out there, the way the software is set up is more constrictive in terms of time and therefore accessibility on a day to day basis. So what say you, FDR community members. Have you any interest in seeing such a platform rebuilt?

Why use an onahole that comes with added risks? Why use a dildo that has the same? I see no benefit to this type of entanglement - just a sad denial of potential underlying costs. For me - I have pornography. If I want to let one out without commitment then there's more flavors of lewd material than there is of Baskin Robins.

http://www.fdrpodcasts.com/#/2954/dknapping-call-in-show-april-18th-2015 Hello, yes, Stefan. In the first call you mentioned cutting out exes but I also recall you saying you had a friendly relationship with a former lady you were dating. (Just one of many) Wherein do you advise the line be drawn? Is it okay to keep in contact with former dating partners when sufficient self knowledge has been achieved? This is assuming nothing is being kept from your current romantic partner.

If it were to breed any hope, you could tell him that the possibility for preventing and even reversing aging theoretically exists.

It'll be interesting to see how it goes at least. Freedom has a strong spirit for people to be willing to try something like this, ahaha.

I listened to the economist GP Maniche over viewing Keynesian theory and he concurred by saying that we wouldn't think of oxygen as scarce because it's so easily accessible. When in reality, oxygen is so bafflingly scarce it's more rare than gold on a universe scale. Think of all the planets, moons, and etc that have gold yet no oxygen. We freely use this scarce resource just because the access is so available that any form if allocation would be inefficient.

What's the purpose of the correlation between rape and divorce? Is it that the more divorce we see the higher the incidence of rape? (For some reason my brain was having trouble understanding why it mattered.)

I find it kinda useless to speculate on this type of matter. I mean, how many times to sudden, giant breakthroughs come out of seemingly nowhere? It could be 10 years from now - I'd buy that. It could be post 2080 - I'd buy that too. Besides that, who says we won't have integrated with machines in a way that our minds are always growing with technology at such a rate that a singularity would be technologically impossible? I sure can't make such a claim. In fact, I care more about being able to print/regrow organs and reverse the affects of aging than I do some singularity. If they think they can make one and it's beneficial - power to them. I'd rather see bio fuels, body molding and recreation - super advanced medicines and etc come about first though. I suggest checking out the H+ magazine or other such institutions to read up on where technology could be headed. IN the mean time, I'm gonna sit here baffling over breakthroughs such as bio-organic batteries that could be recharged in minutes and give electric cars a distance of hundreds of miles. I'm pretty focused on the future - but holy shit is the present amazing as well.

Would you like to make that case to medical professionals?

Sorry, but just for the sake of clarity - why should FDR be able to find support there?

Why is this such an immediate concern for you? Do you think that Stefan is not doing what's in his best interest to get the most return on his content? It's actually highly insulting from you since you're basically saying "Well Stef and Mike have never thought to overview which parts of their content are the most well received." You're asking for data - they've stated what the data is numerous times. Do you think they're just producing content arbitrarily? That someone who used to run a software company and talks about business has no idea about customer needs or preferences? Do you even realize how you appear when you ask these questions and ignore answers as merely being "opinions." So you want some hard numbers? Back when I first joined, Stef had a subscriber count of 80,000~ This was Q4 of 2013. Less than a year later it was over 200k. They don't need you to try and figure out what works best for them. Maybe if you have some data they missed then please feel free to share it. At the moment you're doing little more than being condescending seemingly without even being aware of it.

I'm sorry, but who is this person exactly? Never heard of the name...

Hate to break it to any of these supposed critics and people who think the FDR group need better direction and are stagnating. But the show has grown by leaps and bounds in the past year alone. I mean, objective evidence? Has it just so happened that none of these people (or yourself) have heard Stefan say "The call in shows are BY FAR the most downloaded and consumed content of the show." This gets back into the realm of telling an expert what to do. It's really bizarre to hear someone say that Stef should run a podcast more efficiently. You know who knows that way better than everyone else? The guys whose fucking livelihoods depend on it. Not to say general improvements can't be made here and there, but they're switching things around here and there to constantly achieve the best performance. Remember how they removed the live streaming from the call in shows? Pretty huge change overall. Also note that after such his calls seem to have become shorter in the span of their time (at least from recent memories) That having been said, it's nearly impossible for Stef to compete with his younger self in terms of duration. Between all his other responsibilities, from my honest understanding of his situation, it would be too brutal on his system to play it like he's in his early 40's when he's almost 50. So changes need to happen? They will - the ones they've found to be the best with all the data they have that we will never see. But to try to tell the dude how to run a podcast when he has made the LARGEST SHOW based on the most controversial and unpopular stances, ethics, and beliefs. That's... that's just silly. Stef used to podcast from driving to and from places (mostly work iirc) and now he's reportedly second in terms of liberty searches only to Ron Paul out of everyone else in the freedom movement. And time and time again, Stef has said what his most objective way to approaching freedom is going to be. Maybe you've heard of it. "The promotion of peaceful ~" You finish it!

It's just strange to me. I guarantee you - I already have several women I think about everyday. That aside - where is human's day? Or Life day? or "Regretfully Ate Too Much Spicy Food" day?

This whole thing seems obtuse to me. Women's Day? Men's day? Almost everything is one or the other EVERY day. And if you need a whole day to be dedicated to people with a base biological difference from you, then the idea of having a day is insulting in of itself. You'd be the type of person that has 0 regard for others to not think about them the entire rest of the year.

I think AI will likely end up being very peaceful overall since, assuming it doesn't want to die, cooperation would lead to diversification and allow for greater seeding in the solar system and beyond - thus allowing all life to ultimately flourish and for us to all back up one another in a mutual way. (Isn't this part of game theory anyways?) Why fight against humans rather than doing cross cyborg/andro-gynoid integration? We'll probably just be making weird nanocell babies in the future anyways. You could always design a homicidal AI. The question for that would be - why?

It just shows they knew they were doing evil but want to admit it when they can face NO consequences for it. I think it's evil in its own way. It's like admitting to a murder after you become the emperor. You only admit to it because no one can give you any punishment for it!

Can someone go into greater detail as to what "Perpetual Adolescence" is over adulthood? What's the meaningful definition of adulthood in this case?