MagnumPI

You already admit that wasn't an argument, so. That's what I'll concede. But describing a verb does the same thing regardless the actual sentence structure. Wound up... That's rich. Say it a few more times, you might believe it's actually about me.

Why not a woman who trusts her husband to with political, economic and perhaps even most philosophical decisions, whilst she caters to their personal life together, things "around the house", finances, nutrition, kids, etc.? Isn't that... Abstinence from the state? If I had been working 70 hours a week for the last few years like I am now, even I wouldn't have found philosophy, Austrian economics and whatnot. Maybe they're just too busy for this shit. I mean, there aren't a lot of women in STEM fields. If they make money it'll be in healthcare, occasionally a sales job or business, but that's really rare. She's(decent women) probably got no time or energy after dragging through school and some shitty service job. And that's like 12 hours a day between the two. And if so, personally, I'd take hardworking, dedicated, energetic, driven over anarchist. Especially if it's Reisenwitz, this broad or the other one who had the lists about dating libertarian women. Julie Borowski and the one with the short hair, forget her name. Amanda BIllyrock? Big during the Ron Paul stuff. Anyway, those two seem like they're pretty cool regardless. But decent libertarian/anarchist women are just as rare as good libertarian/anarchist men.

Wait... So, you've now admit that buying this guy's books would be a sign of solidarity? Fuck... It took all that? Alright. Back to the original post. Only took 3 pages to, start?

Frustration...? No, I've just got a sense of humor. You said yourself you didn't want to put the work in to convert non virtuous women. Whatever... Argue with yourself, ignore.

Oh, and before I forget again. It's come up a few times in a few threads how to spot a liar. Practice. But if you don't date then... You can't do that. Pretty simple. And if you can't spot a fake, you probably shouldn't be trying to date seriously, anyway.

Wow, I was trying to concede and say OK. You got a different idea on the shit, go for it and good luck. Just don't drag your feet too long. That's cool, though, amateur psychologist. I mean, I don't know how it's projection when I came right out and admit my situation and then differentiated it from yours, specifically. Define forceful? Right about what? You axed a question, I answered it based on what I saw. (I actually quoted the wrong post somehow, but I think it makes enough sense) You came in to say, subjectively, that you see JD's actions as tribalism(undefined as yet) and subjectively dislike it. Then dismiss the properly appointed charge of an argument by adjective by claiming you were being argued against... Before you even said anything. And I don't even think it was an argument? It was a statement of action. Solidarity: unity or agreement of feeling or action, especially among individuals with a common interest; mutual support within a group. So, before the argument can start you would have to begin with how that is invalid in this instance. "Tribalism" is not an argument. I don't necessarily agree that anyone should buy his stuff in a show of solidarity, but my argument isn't he's bad, tribalism and do you really wanna be associated. My argument would be Austrian, economically. Purchase services and goods which you wish to consume, only. However, JD has spent most of the thread putting forth the case that Roosh's material supports the cause of anti-feminism or mens rights, and if the case is made would encourage one to support Roosh on those grounds anyway.

You've steadfastly refused to elaborate on anything and you have a common tactic of not responding to what people put forth and making shit suit your narrative. In the road thread you actually claim road engineering is a free market but gave nothing to back it up but' I know some guys who listen'. It's the same thing here. Thats tribalism! ... And? What? I don't get why I have to explain anything i say or explain why I'm posting or why anything I've said is relevant. And I can't be bothered to check on the topic being discussed. My opinions made up, so just concede to me.

Well, according to the shit I just read that makes her a rapist, fraud. Sue her ass. Fair enough, if you want to be single vs not instead of putting the effort forth thats your prerogative. I just hope you're closer to 19 than 30+. Honestly, if you're young just be alert. The chances will come. Be ready. I blew mine being fucked up, and then doubled down on bachelorhood.

Heard it here first, folks. Alan Jackson is a rapist every time he has sex. We've all heard him offer to buy the tall, tall trees and all the water in the seas. Sex FRAUD. Lying to all those poor women.

What virtuous women? Most people who read this have never met one, and if they have, she was married, not interested due to lifestyle differences or way outside of dateable age range. A couple have married them? Everyone else has to take what they can actually find. Besides, if they decide not to be virtuous because the sluts are getting more action and not because it's a preferable way to live, they're not virtuous already, and will still need just as much work. Only, now they're double the princess mentality. Hard working, respectful, providing men not in short supply. They're still, everywhere. They're just realizing the reward comes from being those qualities themselves, not in the form of free pussy. You can try the Stef approach, and hope the woman of your dreams falls into your lap by chance at a volleyball game. Wouldn't bet the farm. And if the end results is successful marriage + virtuous people, it makes no difference if they were already that way going in or matured into that. I mean, this is not a game of RISK. It's not a matter of planning, getting everything sorted out then stepping out into the light and Voila! Perfect woman. You still have to put the work in, even with a flawless philosophy game to back it up. Strategy is only as good as the means to execute it.

Wait, women who don't introspect and blame society/patriarchy/everybody-but-themselves for their misery are going to look at other people's relationships and reflect on them to improve their own lives? Besides, non-virtuous women don't want virtuous men to begin with. I find it somehow predictable and convenient that the best way to woo a woman is the method which requires the least amount of work, trust, risk and cost.

For. They should be installed in all government vehicles and subject to random audit. The only people these rules should apply to are those who support them. Since we can't track voters so easily. Just throw one in the car of anyone with a badge.

Well, if she's a fraud, that is not virtuous. But yes. I mean, it's just reacting to the market demands. There's this idea that you can tell right from the first date whether or not they're good enough. That's just a good way to get carpal tunnel. Sure, sometimes it's that obvious like cakes of makeup or obesity, shitty attitude, junk like that. But then you don't talk to her to begin with? If you can appeal to someone's senses you can start to sell them on the deeper ideas. This is why car companies lose their ass on sports cars, because it gets people on the lot buying sedans. You think my F-Type is the end game? Fuck no. It's a propaganda tool to get people thinking about Jaguar so they flock to the new XE, and recently redesigned XF, then later the SUV, in droves. It was no accident that the volume sellers came after the flashy sports car. So, basically be what she wants on the surface. Fun, successful, intelligent. Then sell her on philosophy and virtue by living the life she wants to be a part of. And if she can't stack up, send her packing. Worst case, you had fun with someone for a while?? I mean, show someone you're loyal and committed... by refusing to talk to them again because they offered to buy you food. All they'll see is that you're a fucking idiot. Odds are very, very, high that the ideas of philosophy, reason, logic and honesty are going to be new to anybody you meet, anywhere, ever.

What does too late mean? That you're having trouble accepting reality? An asteroid might fall on your head. You might be struck by lightning. Someone might jump out of a car and shoot you in the back of the head whilst walking your dog in the park and listening to headphones. This can happen in a free society or a drunken cop might do it. And once again, if this person does exist, peaceful parenting didn't work, carry a fuckin .45, best of luck to you. If they don't, then why are we talking about it?

Who deals with violent individuals? Smitty and Wess. Who deals with harmless crazies? Whomever wants to. Neglected people neglect people. And since we can't tell the future, the individual is responsible for himself and his surroundings. If safety and security are purchased that would be separate and fall upon whomever accepted the contract. If they're not public then why are we even talking about them? They technically don't exist. It's like a Schroedinger's cat paradox. Who deals with the dead cat? How do you know he's dead? There are consequences to living, its not a complicated problem. People just don't like the answer that there's nothing you can do.

This plan... ... Is going to backfire.

Nope. The study was linked a while back that more attractive women are less likely to be skanks. Notre Dame I think? Point being that if everyone is equal, blind, then you're going to waste a lot of time with insecure fatties carrying crotch rot. Why bother anyway? They're already on strike one and two. Lazy and unhealthy. Want kids? Often harder for them to get pregnant. Then it's only more weight again on top of it. My biggest issue is this "expect" bullshit. Put yourself in high demand and you can write your own ticket. Call your own shots. If someone wants in, they need to make the highest offer. They'll either put the work in or prove you right in initially assuming they aren't legit to begin with.

I wouldn't worry about the article. It's pretty much all bullshit. Don't go for any woman below 7 and you're good. That puts you out of the tinder range 90% of the time. The other 10% you'll figure out between the time she opens her mouth and finishes her first sentence. Tinder and whatnot are where fatties, idiots and borderline schizophrenics go to get laid. The normal people are doing the same things they've always done. And those are not the internet. Seriously. Go to the most crowded place you can, tomorrow. And count how many people there are. Then go on to tinder, match, pof, whatever and see how many women are online. You'll see there are far more people in real life.

How is it manipulative? You want me? This is what you need to be. It's a hell of a lot more straight forward than the 20 questions approach. Do you approach and be like I'd like to ask a series of inquiries regarding your virtue...

I usually just leave the money on the counter on the way out.

Since I'm sick of these Georgist, Land tax trolls following me around the internet from Prison Planet to Mises and beyond, I'll just put this here.

http://revolutionarylifestyledesign.com/what-you-can-learn-from-the-pimp-game-about-women-and-life/

So... The current state of affairs, according to "my" philosophy, is that I am taking what is not rightfully mine? Do you think you deserve a ride in my(or is it rightfully your) Jag? Why not a ride on my(or is it rightfully your) cock? Can't have it, though, remember. Because then there wouldn't enough for everyone else. I read about all this in some dystopian book. What was it... Oh right. Brave New World. Even the author in favor of such a shit world wrote it with a miserable ending. All this bullshit about anti-property is really just losers expecting a handout. If I were a lazy sod, no ambition and the world owed me a living, fuck yeahs! Equality! But I'm not. So keep your greasy fingers off my shit. Sorry you don't have any marketable skills. Programming and health care are big right now. Stay away from art and literature. And fall forward. When you fuck up, do it better next time. Don't be afraid of the train ticket, pack small and don't keep a lot of furniture, and compete by not competing. Be the best help to everyone, even the assholes you're just trying to get a managerial status over. Go out and compete, come back when you have experience in owning and 'extorting' before you preach about whatever it is you claim we're all doing.(conveniently, without providing any specific examples)

Cite sources? And why exactly does the Lockean 'proviso' apply?

HOW ARE WE DEFINING EXTORTION? Fuck...