A4E
-
Posts
718 -
Joined
-
Days Won
10
Everything posted by A4E
-
Uhh... S.D.Attenborough, not just toxic but mad.
A4E replied to barn's topic in Science & Technology
When younger, I watched probably all of them, and the general feeling I had is that nature is awesome and cool and nice... and at the end of about half of the documentaries, humans are mentioned as the impending threat to it all. Always left me with a mild distaste for humans. So I initially agree with OP that there is some camouflaged "We need to take control of humans to save the planet" propaganda. I don't have time to try to find evidence, just sharing my opinion. -
Evidence for Higher Being Intelligence (not human)
A4E replied to GoodJBoy's topic in Atheism and Religion
Considering that gravity might have been much less when dinosaurs were alive (because of a possibly smaller planet), gravity is pretty weak with the size of our planet now, and even weaker when our planet might have been smaller at that time... so im still hoping there is some very simple explanation for gravity. General relativity is just too complicated imo, and ripe with problems. -
Only thousands?... Childs play... I ignore billions of people every day who all have coherent stories.
-
Evidence for Higher Being Intelligence (not human)
A4E replied to GoodJBoy's topic in Atheism and Religion
huh... didn't think of that. interesting. Many atoms have more than 1 electron... They push on each other, but not enough to push them away from the proton(s) perhaps?... -
Evidence for Higher Being Intelligence (not human)
A4E replied to GoodJBoy's topic in Atheism and Religion
I've just many a times wondered why and how this universe exist at all. DNA and other pretty clearly evolutionary traits are kinda boring for me compared. One theory I've had for roughly 20 years is that gravity is all protons pulling on all electrons. And/or the other way around. (I don't accept the general relativity theory.) But a theory as simple as that was probably proposed before, and perhaps ignored because its boring. -
They already found out almost everything about it 1 hour after. Who did it and such. Why would you question efficient people like that?
-
Little bit. probably just me, but i dont understand the overall picture you are trying to paint. if you want to try again, can you start over, and tell me as if I was 10 years old?
-
I dont understand. Can you explain it in a different way? I dont know what you mean with this. Can you elaborate?
-
I agree. I just want to try to point out that free willers and determinists generally agree on many things, but we think that we disagree. mostly because of definitions though. ie Stefan (quickly) found a definition of free will early in the video that determinists would agree with. If free willers agree/believe that the universe is 100% consistent, then they should also agree that everything is predetermined, but i have not seen people opposite of me make this connection, only a strong rejection of determinism, like it is some evil end-game boss. I have no problem accepting that we have a choice, just that it is not supernatural, and so conditional to the laws of the universe.
-
I am curious if anyone would disagree with any of these 2 statements: -Generally lifeforms with a brain which have basic abilities, (like remember things), make choices. (ie its easy to see that a cat or lion is weighing when it is most advantageous to stalk a prey, and when to strike. And it does not matter to which extent the lifeform is thinking before making a choice imo. the fact that it is clearly making a choice is evidence enough of some thinking that we can not easily analyze the extent of anyway.) -As far as we can understand, the universe seems to have laws of physics that are consistent and can presumably never be manipulated, bent, or otherwise changed, except between the laws themselves working on each other. (if you accept more controversial quantum stuff, then you probably already disagree with this one, which is ok.)
-
Thanks for the mindblow. Never heard about it before. I've Heard about hollow earth, but not this.
-
Wow. Eye opener!
-
Yes, and yes. No. Repair holes or other smaller damage not caused by ie a dentist drill. See this thread. I did not touch on the efficacy of vaccinations in this thread, and if you are a person who likes to put words in peoples mouth, then I will be less inclined to converse with you. From my research it does not look like vaccines have any long term benefit for humanity. Maybe a tiny/small short term benefit for individuals against some particular diseases, but that is extremely outweighed when compared to all the other effects of injecting aluminum, anti freeze, mercury, and other toxins into children/people. Also vaccines can give the disease that they are supposed to protect against. Things that make intelligent parts of the world live longer: -Clean water. -Good food. (variety, quality) -Good environment. (hygiene, sewage) The 3 things above results in the body being very able to fight disease, as it is not compromised by other factors. AIDS is a condition where the immune system is compromised, leaving the body prone to attacks from bacteria or viruses. One way to get AIDS is to use certain allopathic medicine/drugs. Another way to get AIDS is to be somewhere with dirty water, bad food, and/or a bad environment. Standard testing for HIV counts white bloodcells, if it is low, then you magically have the HIV virus. There is a documentary called "House of numbers" that goes into detail on this.
-
My words are there.
-
I refer you to this thread.
-
That's quite a lot of work to dig up/remember. So perhaps just start with a few of the most controversial ones that you might not have swallowed. No humans have been on the moon. No Jews were gassed to death in german concentration camps. (illegal to talk about in many countries) A lot of red pills around health... Teeth can heal themselves with calcium and d vitamin. (ie cod liver oil) Allopathic medicine mainly makes your health worse, and kills a lot of people every year, due to ie mistakes, but also just 'normal' use. Most diseases are either preventable or curable with the right nutrition. There are many effective cures for cancer. vaccines kill and damage children. And are responsible for many of the more common illnesses that children have today. No link between HIV and AIDS. No evidence, only circumstantial. (I'm not 100% sure but its not healthy to go around doubting my research) I remember other ones when I need them.
-
The 35ish different red pills I've swallowed, best thing that happened for my life. And I will never go back. (and that is kinda impossible anyway) Depressing and frustrating in the beginning, but very good in the long term.
-
I accept determinism for the moment, but my life is the complete opposite of 'going along to get along' or leaf floating around. As mentioned in op and countless other posts around, determinism does not mean people don't make choices based on their exp and knowledge and circumstances. The only difference in determinism is that those choices were predetermined. I am assuming free willers do not affiliate spiders with free will, so when a spider makes a web somewhere, did it choose to do so, or was it just pure robotic behaviour that happened by chance to result in that location?
-
So what if I say the idea of physical law breaking free will, is the first step to thinking you have superpowers? You guys are smart people, but it seems you have enormous difficulty accepting that you are a part of what looks like a deterministic universe. I don't get it. Revoking responsibility/agency does not have to mean anything bad happening to society, because we have no problems revoking agency from wolves or other predators, but it does not mean we let them hunt down our children. We keep them away from society, just like we will with bad people. Imagine if all people accept that they have no agency, but that the number one priority is to have a peaceful society, maybe it would result in a completely new way of thinking on the part of immoral people. (I know that is a stretch...). Lets say Bob steals another guys phone. Then the other guy calls the pol... wait that example did not work. Lets say Adam hits a random guy on the street because he is so pissed off at how much sense Stefan Molyneux is making online. The equivalent of a police force track him down, and tell him: "We all know that you have no agency in what you did, but you are hurting and threatening the continued existence of our peaceful and prosperous free market society. You have the right to make amends and go to counseling, (since we all make mistakes sometimes), so that you can continue to work with and build our society. If we see that you will not do this, then you are not welcome in this society no more. and sufficient measures will be used to make sure you are not in our society." What will Adam think? And more importantly what will he think when evaluating if he should even do any immoral thing, since he has already learned how his society works. Either he make amends (some kind of work or restitution) and have to be counseled until his bad ways are exorcised, or he will be banished/killed. I know my idea can create a new set of problems. But its not like the current systems (like jails) are working very well.
-
'The truth about vaccines' is a nice documentary series with experts on vaccines, that will add a lot to your knowledge base before making a decision. For my own personal opinion at the moment, it goes something like, Vaccines = Toxic = Worse health = More disease = Weaker immune system
-
in these situations, how about trying to talk peacefully, and then if the 20% don't want to talk, but rather raise their voice, slander you, get violent, threaten, etc, point out what they are doing, and then just ignore them? (Just my amateur question) I'd imagine that others and the person involved would remember how he lost control in a peaceful discussion.
-
Physics is 100% repeatable, by definition.
A4E replied to Mat H Physics's topic in Science & Technology
Woah! I appreciate you taking the time to get out of your cryptosleep casket to reply. No I'm attacking you because you are not being decent to people here. And showing pretty clear signs of instigating resentment towards people like me who value truth / physics / logic but try to be decent and nice to people. Might you be so kind as to explain your silly username? I firmly believe that physics had the day off on 9 11. Or maybe physics called in sick to the universe. Which means that a lot of star systems in our galaxy might have gone a bit whack during that day. I would be one of those. Pretty sure you can just schedule some appointment with Stefan through the correct contacts on this website. And they will talk with you and put it on youtube. But please don't, because you will just help make the rest of us look like aholes. But I know that you will not call in, because you know that you will have to be a decent person with him, or he will just end the talk. Also Stefan has talked about some of his scepticism of 9 11 in a very old podcast. I don't know how much of that is left in him, but its something to keep in mind. What you achieve by being like this is pretty much nothing else than resentment and disgust from the people you give the impression you want to inform. And those decent people not accepting the first story that was pushed down peoples throats after 1 hour on that day, will have a less friendly environment to talk in. Those things and your silly name is a hallmark of instigators wanting to flame the discussion so that less and less people actually take it seriously. That can also explain why you came back after more than 1 year, just to refresh the attempt at instigation, hoping that I've gone away or something. I know that instigators have been successful around on internet regarding 9 11, that is why I am warning this forum about that. -
A slightly more detailed version of Mike Adam's acoustic analysis that reveals a second shooter:
-
I watched this video yesterday, and it has garnered an additional 200000 views until today. Typical shock value thumbnail, but it actually has concise information. Though the meat of the matter starts at 5:00. Personally i would not be surprised if Stephen Paddock should be completely vindicated, which means that he could have been 'gotten rid of' before this.
-
I just watched this, and was wondering what you guys think of it. Its a different take on many shocking events. I tried to share it at the point where it really starts, at 9:09. This presentation was uploaded on 22. september. I can not say that I agree with his final perspective, but the information and evidence he lays out is even surprisingly valuable for an avid researcher like myself.
