A4E

Strawman. Wow. Really. Not sure how I got my information screwed up then. Will it work like if an object is going at 2% of C, that time will go slower for it than for an object going at 1%? What about the movement of the planet, and solar system, and galaxy? Is time changing dynamically according to these all the time as well? If so, we would have some serious issues making any accurate measurements of the universe. And if an object is going at 100% of C, time will stand still for it, right? so how can it move anywhere if it is 'frozen' in time??

I thought the premise was that time slowed down for an object the more speed above the speed of light you are going. Is it not? I don't think it would be possible to go backwards into time to the moment the object was created and watch it transform into its previous state. Or is that included in it? I thought something like that was only possible in worm holes or black holes. (two equally fantastic contraptions) But this is exciting to think about right? One reason it got popular. A boring universe where everything is straightforward is not exciting enough. Relativity theory = Fail videos and cat videos of today? Well. The people behind the theory, or other supporters, would have to prove the theory. And it is other people's choice whether they want to believe a theory or not. If people create new theories based on a theory, then that is their choice and problem. I agree with Steljarkos that it holds back productive science.

Why not? I read the paragraph before, but just curious if you have more to back up such a conclusion.

Without trying to remember this video too much, I think the point is that he is not showing any signs of changing, or attempts of changing. And that the person on the phone is certainly not the person who can bring about any of that. People can change. Its just that they might need some other person than who they already know, or someone with medical/religious/any authority to intervene, in order to accept that they need to change. Or just hit rock bottom, perhaps several times. An alcoholic is going to automatically change his drinking pattern if he has no money left, or physical ability to get more.

If this forum was a soccer match, would you still call players on the other team 'bullies' if they took the ball from you, or blocked it from where you wanted it to go? Sentimentality is quite a powerful and disabling force. If you let it grow its leaves around you, you will just be left crippled, and lulled into nothingness. Push that member berry manure away, look forward and make history. I have been engulfed by this crippling force, so I know what I am talking about. It will take several years to get out of it if you let it sink its teeth in you. (member berry: south park reference) No. Stop waiting for other people. Make it happen! And I'd imagine because you want the world to be a better place, with less immorality. (maybe that was such a given that you forgot about it)

Not sure what country you are from. But you probably have the court as a last shield against getting thrown in jail, even if there are laws against beheadophobia. Another option is to rally a bunch of friends that you can trust. Agree that you will all post these things, and agree to help each other if something happens. If you have few friends, or want to remain solo or whatever, if something happens, I am sure you can ask for help here, but you would probably have to become completely public and show some proof. But remember that more prominent people than you, like Robinson, can still walk freely, which is a good sign that now is not the time to cower in fear. It is definitely too late when most of the government have a thick beard and disbelievers need to pay tribute. I would say fear is a worse enemy than Islam. It seems to be the main reason Islam have gained so much ground.

selfuniverse d0t com. But I don't have much if any about QM there yet. Yeah I had that in the back of my mind, but did not think he was very serious about being sceptical to his own theories. And being critical of your own convictions is usually a rare occurrence, or only valid for people who are in transit from one belief to another.

So if you were able to program some person to walk a mile, and arrive at a destination, then it could not be said that the person did any walking? We might call it walking, but that is just an illusion? Could you define free will in your context? Like most people accept that water is needed to keep the body hydrated. Or that people accept that they can not normally touch someone they are talking to over internet. Or that people accept that sunlight will make you warmer.

Ordinary people will not know, or just be hostile to a word like "fallacy". A psyop that you want to create requires simple terms or words that people can relate to and link together. Our enemy knows this. Like "Conspiracy - theory", "climate - denier", "anarchist - agitator"

Very well laid out! Can I put it on my website with your name on it? I accepted most of the relativity, and big bang, and black holes, and the 'gravity and light space time' that dabbles in time travel. Until I started my red pill journey 10ish years ago slowly unmasking one lie after another. QM is very compelling, and far far more respectable than the relativity stuff. I concluded a long time ago that one of the reasons Albert Einstein was promoted and hailed so much, was simply because it was exciting and interesting, and that the control freaks at that time did not mind it, and probably helped it along. Albert Einstein himself surely thought he was right of course. It seems that the QM science needs alternative forms of media to be presented to people, as I can not recall much of it in controlled media, which only means its more possible that it can be the truth.

Do you have some examples of basic ideas and concepts you have, or have had problems understanding? Or is it all of them?

Fair point. But getting informed about ie obviously staged moon landings, may act as a gateway red pill to harder red pills. Actually all those will probably make people more motivated to be more productive, to try to avert them, because they can prepare for all of those (ie great wall of china), but you can not prepare for the nuclear armageddon, unless you have enough personal capital to make a home underground or something, and then still you know that you would face significant problems surviving in the long run.

if I recall correctly, no one in this thread has disputed exploitable nuclear energy. It is the nuclear explosive capabilities that are under question. That is a good point, and I and others here surely understand that, but you are leaving out the negatives, which have been mentioned in this thread. People might not feel motivated to build anything, or make anything happen, or invest time in oneself, or anything productive that requires work, since... Everything and everyone could blow up tomorrow. I started this thread because I am always in search for what is true, and was convinced that this forum was ment for that, and it has not disappointed. I am pretty sure a thread like this would not be much possible anywhere else. If nuclear explosions is a sham, but the net result is considerably positive, (even if lots of people don't care so much about being productive anymore), do you think it is ok to keep the lie alive?

Thank god I have a lot of things to do now.

That is normal for a strong building. End of thread.

Do you think we should stop trying to explain why dinosaur media is spreading propaganda about current events? When Trump fires Comey, and the dinosaur media says he did because he wants to stop investigations into any ties with Russia. Should we then not talk about any agendas behind that propaganda, because "It has entertainment value, but nothing actionable" ?

For one it means no one has a claim on the moon. And perhaps the tax payers has something to say about their money being used for a very expensive 'show'. And it can be nice to keep it in mind. For example when/if NASA or others try to convince people about a trip to Mars. High production value videos were popping up several years ago, that always linked a flat earth perspective with 'that's why there was no moon landing'. It is quite an ingenious psyop to link scepticism, with a flat earth perspective. It has found its way into this forum which is an example of just how effective it has been. These high production value videos did not just spawn by themselves. They would need funding. (Even the narrator is professional sounding in these videos). There are probably people who really believe in flat earth, but if there is, they are usually residing in channels with a low production value. What also happened as far as I know, is that real hardcore long time flat earthers has a website/forum that was rapidly invaded, and obfuscated, by new people, which also shows that this was not some natural growing support for a flat earth perspective. It was pushed along, and always with the 'that's why we did not go to the moon' agenda. It also means that someone found it necessary to create this psychological operation. And that is likely because science, evidence, observations, pictures, etc all stack up to not be in favour of a successful moon excursion. And these things are easily shared on internet. But since this successful psyop, those do not readily have much value anymore. Since anything I or others say about it will now be countered with the produce of the psyop. You put different things in a bag, labeled it religion, and presented that to a person who is talking about some, or one of them? Ok behaviour?

According to wikipedia you don't need reflectors to bounce lasers off the moon. If there are reflectors on the moon, they would not have to put them there with the help of people. A rocket loaded with a ton of glass shards sent to crash on the moon might even have been enough. I don't know how or if they did send something reflective to the moon, but the point is that it is not an evidence for humans setting foot on the moon. Just as the other usual arguments are not. There is however quite a lot of evidence that we did not go there, and probably still do not have the required technology to safely get to the moon and back. You are lucky that I even bothered replying since you still could not contain yourself calling me names after I had notified you.

Non arguments, somewhat ordinary personal attacks, a straw man, 'science' fogging. So you are joking right?... hahaha... You got me at first. I don't believe that the Apollo moon landings did not happen. I know that the Apollo moon landings did not happen. In the same way I know that water is a liquid.

I understand the social aspect of going along to get along. However if everyone leaned on that, then me and you would not have been red pilled. And Hillary Clinton would be forced to cough to everyone about once per month. But I was not talking about red pilling specifically. Just talking about streaming something on twitch. If for example gardening is a thing you do in your spare time, then you can start with that. And when you get popular, and it is generating economic support for you, THEN you could begin red pilling. (You could theoretically stream anything there, which is why I said gardening) I just got a feeling that you would be able to be a streamer, from what I saw in your post. And also from your second post. I am just guessing that you would have the ability to go on and on talking to your viewers, which most successful streamers need to do/are doing.

Impressive. some notes in my head: (Very good video! just want to share) Things were moving forward a bit fast for me. I was struggling to hang on to the narrative, partially due to somewhat UK influenced language (because I am norwegian). But I was thinking that the general population in the UK might have some similar things to say about the speed and the slightly stressful way it was presented. Comments about how bad something is should perhaps be reserved until after explaining why it is bad. (at least in a public setting like youtube). Ie, "This policy does x and y and z, therefore it is arguably one of the worst policies ever made.". Or just explain how it works, in a way to make it easy for the viewers to understand why it is so bad, leaving personal comments out of it.

Judging by how you write (easy to read), and say that you do socially with people to 'get things done' maybe something where you need to be social, or connect with people. I have been scouting the website Twitch d0t tv, and am considering setting up some live stream there. Maybe something like that could be for you. If your stream is enjoyable, or interesting, fun, or whatever, then people will come to look. And then start pouring money your way, that is if you are determined, and in for the long haul and scheduled live stream hours, and have it in you to keep talking or half shouting or acting or anything to the viewers.

Life gets better instantaneously when you fully accept and stop waiting for other people to do something (for you).

You could also design one yourself and use some third party to sell it.

1- He is alive. And busy beating in the talking points from the quran into young men, because the quran is apparently too weak and too unappealing and too long and too outdated for the young men to want to read it for themselves so that they can make up their own mind. 2- Hammering in the same phrases or paragraphs about something without letting anyone ask questions about it. And doing so in a place of perceived or recognized authority. I have seen that indian guy taking questions from anyone, but he just makes up stuff as he goes if someone asks a real question, like 'if men and women are equal in Islam, why does every lady have to sit behind all the men in this large concert size area?' His answer was somewhere along the lines of "Its nothing about anything, women have been placed in different areas before and its nothing to worry about." 3- Its called an educated guess. If you don't know sending a person to war is likely to get him killed, then he must be brain damaged or something... Sure they are promised a lot in the 'afterlife', but if there is so much in the afterlife, just go jihad yourself then and let the young men follow if they want. And yes I know the families are taken care of, but that is not a productive future, and not anywhere near having a man to support the family. Its wellfare. 4- Going to a market place and not knowing if you are going to be blown to pieces, or run over by a peace truck.