A4E
-
Posts
718 -
Joined
-
Days Won
10
Everything posted by A4E
-
Some comments from accounts on youtube: Happy Healthy Human: "they better have lots of video of this joker carrying bag after bag after bag after bag after bag thru the casino yesterday bc there is a 0% chance you're having all that hardware in a hotel room there for more than 24 hours bc housekeeping is coming in and they are going through all your shit. seems pretty far-fetched. I read there is a homeland security conference beginning in Vegas tomorrow. " sagrammyfour: "My friend is ex military, and the first thing he said was he heard 3 separate weapons firing at once. " Michael Moran: "Those windows have sensors on them and are shatterproof ballistic glass, this is to prevent suicides and are in every Las Vegas high rise. As soon as those windows even have a certain amount of pressure applied, security will be up to that room within a few minutes pounding on the door and loudly asking if everything is OK and if they get no answer they open the door and come in to make sure that you are not trying to commit suicide and therefore have a multi million dollar lawsuit from the family members. You have to remember that these casinos have more money than any bank and go very far to protect that money, there has to be multiple shooters or a shooter in a different position. " K G: "How is it possible that people from the nearby rooms didn't hear assault rifles firing to call 911. This smells funny! " DISTURBING THE PEACE: "...why would the stage crew light up the kill box(zone) " -
If they base this on reports, then they should take into account that: -x number of injuries/deaths/SIDS might be ignored by parents/victims as having been caused by recent vaccine(s). Because most parents believe vaccines are safe. -x number of parents tell their doctor that they are pretty sure it is because of the vaccines, but doctor firmly denies any relation, or 'accepts' relation but only decides to report y amount of cases to the CDC because reporting is tedious work.
-
Please explain how the above two quotes of yours do not contradict each other. In the short run, that is how it works yes. In the long run, it is the perfect genes for the environment that persists. Which results in what I said at first: You can search on internet just as easily as I can. Look up indoctrination and see that your 'begging the question' accusation is nullified. As you already know: "Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike."
-
Yes. Good to have you on board. Now I trust you will stick to your word and do that in any form you'd like. Watch out for changes in the definition of polio, that I just learned about by following your advice. Looks like my evolution argument was not understood. If there was a better way for humans (or animals) to protect themselves against tiny organisms, they would have evolved differently to make the best defense possible. I know that the tiny organisms will do the same, which is also why the current way of trying to immunize people using the tiny organisms, is akin to opening pandoras box, because of things like vaccine shedding. I do. Its just that my questions and examples might have been a bit too intricate, skipping several steps. Sorry about that. Now we have come to the root of your replies in this thread. Thanks for revealing that. The majority of people critical to vaccines now were also pro-vaccines, or vaccine-accepting. And that is not because we were shown slides and statistics and actual history when we were young. Its just another indoctrination. True or false, good or bad, science, not science, I think you can admit that it is indoctrination, Right? No one here would probably be able to convince you to be open minded to our side and look at personal cases, and some documentaries or lectures or anything critical to vaccines, until something happens with yourself, your children, or someone else very close in your family. What is most important to you? That children are healthy, or that anyone in governments, media, and doctors talking about statistics before and after vaccines can be trusted and should be listened to? Please pick one.
-
I have kinda heard of it. It just seemed a bit desperate of you to include it, which also looks like a cowardly deflection. Either injections is an ok/good way to try to teach the body something, or its not/a horrible way. And actually evolution would make sure that it would be used, (in one way or another), if it was safe and effective. And for sure there are systems through the digestive tract and lungs to do it that way. I and others use the short word for that, which is 'natural'. To me it looks like my question did present an opportunity for you to appeal to nature, by pointing to anything of a living organism. Not sure how you did not see that. So compared to what? If the natural state of a human being is to walk and talk, and many of the victims of toxic shots can not do that, and you can throw out the appeal to nature where humans walk and talk. Then what are we left with? Are we going to compare it to whatever is most normal? So if the majority of children can not walk or talk, then it is the children who can walk and talk that are not healthy? Or what?
-
Woah... are you serious right now? Thanks for the laugh though. I have not really laughed that long for some time. What kind of food do you think humans should eat? Be careful not to mention anything of living organisms. You might be appealing to nature. What kind of standards do you propose we can use to compare a healthy life to, if we can not compare it up against nature?
-
Documentary bringing quite a lot to light:
-
Good example, and even though humans mostly eat those pharmacy drugs, they still get sick and die in droves from them. I had a friend from Texas Houston who ate all kinds of those drugs. Through the 15 years I knew him, he got more and more sick from them. His last 8 years was pretty much a part of his life where he could not do anything of the things he wanted to do. He kept trusting/hoping that there is a "perfect formula" to drugs, continued to experiment, and then he just died. And that is just one example I have personal experience with. My mothers life was destroyed by SSRI's as well. Imagine if doctors started injecting all those drugs into people's muscles, blood veins, and such. Or injecting Toothpaste, Soap, Coffee, Aspirin, Cooked food into people. Do you think people would accept the effects of doing that?
-
Wow. Thanks! Listening to it now. The man who had both his sons damaged in the video linked to on your webpage, has a good point that it is crippling society as well. Which mostly means western society. (and now Israel it seems from what he told)
-
Second that. You will spend time and energy, and you will have to focus on it probably for some time. Also you could lose, and that can also make you depressed and what not... And imo it does not seem that you have a clear cut case, so its risky for sure. Some of the only gratifications of winning would be to send a message to the 'bullies' and saving some money, but you don't know for sure that you will win, and the journey there is filled with obstacles for sure... all of which is time, energy and money you can spend with something else.
-
Up until today I was not 100% sure about a link between autism and vaccines. But now I am.
-
Below are some personal testimonies to give a more personal feel to it. There is more on that channel. Btw, my brother had 2 daughters long ago, and tried to confer with his gf/their mother to not vaccinate, but the mother chose to have them both vaccinated, and they are currently in good health growing into adults, but the youngest have always been 'dim'/stupid since very young. And she would prefer to use a nibbler well into her 4-6 years of age, and would frequently pee in her bed if she did not have a diaper when sleeping at that age. (and probably more that I don't know about) And the 1 year older was diagnosed with ADHD and put on Ritalin at a young age (and still use it). Not that I agree that ADHD is any real disease though. When I was around them when they were around toddler age and later, they, (or only the oldest), used to scream very very loud in a powerful high pitched shrieking manner. I guess most people would say that is normal, but I don't know what to think about that as of now.
-
We should all stop showering, so that we stop adding more water vapour into the atmosphere. All involved climate scientists and climate politicians should stop showering, and recommend everyone else to do the same, to show how serious they are about this. All fountains, water parks, and perhaps even all fire departments should be closed as well, to prove how dedicated they are to this. Water rationing is a given, as excess water consumed can be converted into vapour and added to the atmosphere through breathing and sweating. The planet is at stake here!
- 20 replies
-
- 2
-
-
- Climate change
- global warming
- (and 8 more)
-
Normal climate change or man made climate change? I found the "draft" of the report. But dont have motivation to look for cliffnotes. Anyone have some?
-
Ok, so what was your first post in this thread about? It was so triggering and nauseating I don't even want to quote it. You were appealing to authority 'scientists'. But now you have taken a kind of 180. I recognize the need to study or practice something to know about it, but some superficial graduation, or government/EU/UN paycheck scientist/official position does not automatically make you a real rational expert. Though there are plenty of good examples. And like already mentioned, social fear among them. I would feel pretty bad about myself if I made an appeal to superficial authority like you did. But you had no problem posting that? Is it your contention that man made global warming is a big and real problem? What do you think about lord Monckton?
-
Ok. Here is you slightly out of context: Why do you follow the principles of a non academic person, who is without any official position, and who is 'sceptical' of a lot of things in society?
-
Do you have a degree in philosophy, or specifically philosophical skepticism? If not, why should we take anything you say about these skeptics seriously?
-
How many of you forum posters have a doctors degree in English? When it comes to this kind of issue (making straw men, non arguments, earth is a waffle) there are three kind of options: A) The doctors in English posting anything on internet are a bunch of idiots and amateurs, or a group of forum posters know better how to post things in English. B) There is a vast conspiracy that includes all doctors in English to make them continuously come up with misspelled text and what not. C) The doctors in English studied posting on internet for a long time and know more than you about it. Choose wisely.
-
Thanks. I'm trying to understand. In the meantime. As a thought experiment. What if a photon was going at 101 percent of the speed of light. (even if its not possible in the theory), what would happen? And is there any chance that it is happening, but we are just not able to see/understand the effects of it?
-
Thanks. I tried to read it but my brain always has an allergic reaction to complicated formulas and language. So that is an incompatibility on my part. Sorry. Yes, this is what I have accepted as well. Thanks for your reply, but you did not really answer the question I had. Would you be able to offer an explanation in simple terms? Because if time stands still for the light particle, then surely it would either not reach anywhere, or reach instantaneously, or I just don't get it yet. How would it be able to travel at light speed, and still be subject to having to wait for 65 million years to reach the aliens planet in your example?
-
I was thinking about something today. Light particles/waves move at light speed right? And according to the relativity stuff, as described here, time will stand still for anything that moves at light speed. Does that mean that all the light that reach ie this planet, was put out at the exact time or just some milliseconds or whatever after reaching us? Would it also mean that light from other stars and galaxies are reaching us instantaneously or nearly instantaneously?
-
What are you trying to imply here? Reverse badness is not a thing!
-
Where is the European Struggle against Islam headed?
A4E replied to Crusader1986's topic in Current Events
Thanks Aviet. Now I / we understand better why IQ is low(er) in Islamic regions. -
Where is the European Struggle against Islam headed?
A4E replied to Crusader1986's topic in Current Events
To the internet. -
I wouldn't call that holding back though. That kind of money in the right hands could perform miracles. How many years have they received this kind of money? What progress have they made?