A4E

What do you think? Feel free to use anywhere.

You can show people the door, but they have to go through it themselves. If they refuse to go through it or even open the door to see what is on the other side of it, then they have shown you all you need to know. There is no reason then to continue something that is clearly not going to work anyway. So you will not be able to convert him imo. He might still be fairly young, (you did not clarify), which means that his views and opinions can change over years, but most likely not directly from talking with you. Though you have planted a seed. For example, I was a somewhat fanatic climate alarmist around 10 years ago. Today I hold the complete opposite view now that I am enlightened thanks to people on internet. But your friend seems like a closed minded person, and I don't know how it is to be that, so I don't really know if there is any way for him to change his mind.

I see that the view count is going up pretty fast, so those uncivilized people really help him reach more people, and faster. Perhaps we should thank them for bringing empirical examples of their uncivilized ways.

I was sent an email to a video of this guy, and was impressed. His latest video is very solid as well. So much so that it cracks me up. Makes sense that he supposedly was stand up comedian before.

Obviously working for other interests than that of Christianity.

First I want to say that, only if you have spent a lot of time researching on internet, listening to experts, and after a thorough, perhaps off and on multi year investigation, should you ever conclude that you can not create children. You should not make such a conclusion based on what one or more individuals in white coats have told you. Unless you want a relationship to crash and burn and end in a lot of pain, yes, of course you should tell the truth as soon as possible. But this is kind of a non issue in todays society because you already know how to use internet. You can probably go on any dating site and it would have a criteria called "Does not want children", which means you won't even have to tell any potential dates from there, as it would be their responsibility to make themselves informed of your criteria. If you refuse to use online dating, then honesty is the key for long term happiness. Lying wastes time, tortures everyone involved emotionally, and leads to more and more conflict, instead of less and less with honesty. Lying=bad relationship, Honesty=good relationship. True for yourself as well.

It could be that when people talk about sentience here, they actually mean "able to partake in human communication and relations". Which of course is an unrealistic expectation of something that is not human. Just like it is unrealistic that a human is going to partake in seagull communication and relations.

I did not think EU was that bad. Once again internet enlightened me.

If I convert to Islam, but my wife refuses to join me, can I still punish her for not doing as I want? If I convert to Islam, and find out that its not something for me, can I leave and go try out other religions?

Suggestion: If I write a book stating that everyone who is not loyal to the book should be killed, including those who are no longer loyal to it. Is that ok in society today? Might automatically direct the discussion to the important issues.

Is it your view that humans are the only sentient lifeforms on the planet? I'd like to have that explained to me.

had not seen the snippet at the end where Merkel gets rid of the German flag. She attended the 2005 bilderberg meeting and is going to attend this year it seems. She is in for some hefty praise there.

I was highly suspicious yesterday, but now I am much more certain that Mat H Physics is here to create resentment towards 9 11 scepticism. His contrived demeaning language is a giveaway. And these kind of accounts that play on emotion and slander, are plentiful on youtube, and always come with a silly name. It can be a code they use to identify each other. Or it could be the same person. Also his statement "I doubt we will ever hear from you again" was made to provoke, but it tells me that if it was a genuine person who have discussed anything with people on internet, he would not be able to make that statement without lying outright to himself.

Even I found my own post annoying. Because it invites defeatism. Actions (from many) can have wide results, so I admit that I misspoke.

No. We all come with plug and play anti immorality. Anger. Which means that the other child is going to get angry and perhaps do something in anger if the immoral kid is not reacting positively to the anger. This is last resort discussion though, as children should be prepared in advance of property values and others. In the case of a stronger kid stealing from a weaker kid, that would go under taking by force, and so should be treated similarly to adult cases, only that it is subject to the gravity of the situation, (children stealing from each other is not considered very serious). The idea is to show consequences. The victim getting angry will do that automatically, but if the victim is too weak to have any potential retribution, then perhaps that should be handled by someone else. But that does not mean we need to get violent. And in the case of anarchy solutions, I don't know how consequence solutions should, or will be handled. Just that moral agency is a dangerous red herring because immoral actions that harm society can be excused and tolerated. Violence focused Muslims are protected by various excuses ("its their culture", war victim, white supremacy, "its only the extremists", religion of peace). I would classify being loyal to a book that commands all non Muslims to be killed, as an immoral action. Sorry for steering the conversation there, and using that 'card', but I really can not help it in these times. Everyone knows children understand ownership. Basic preparations would be to say "Other children will have toys there as well, but you have to ask them first if you want to play with them. You have to respect it if they say no, and just find something else to do instead.". I would also encourage creativity and negotiation, but that should happen automatically as well if the child is already in such a path. The rest of your post does not seem to me as essential to this discussion.

Good points, but it is sort of complaining that the torpedos of the mafia are being too rough with people. And even if it had success, it will probably just turn into the same later. Removing violent Islam from Sweden wont remove violent Islam from the world. But don't listen to my partypooping, you or anyone doing something will have effect either way.

Then please tell me why in social hierarchical groups, (present in mammals, such as wolves or monkeys, and also present among birds, fish, and other creatures), individuals down on the ladder are generally conforming to the "moral" rules. They might 'choose' not to attempt to mate with higher standing individuals, or mate at all, or take any other privileges. For example there are these monkeys around hot springs in a cold part of Asia somewhere, where the "royalty" can freely use the hot springs, while the others are 'choosing' to not jump into the hot springs. How is this happening? EDIT: I tried to find some evidence of this, but it might have been a bit of misinformation from tv long ago. Its Japans snow monkeys btw. One could argue that animals are held accountable for killing humans, or their livestock, all the time, and then punished for it, (killed). But it is likely that a man with livestock is not giving moral agency to predators when he is protecting his livestock, or a society giving it to a wolf for killing a child, because one can perfectly remove all moral agency from all lifeforms and still protect a peaceful society. But no one here seems to be significantly interested in talking about that, which is fine. How? I am curious. I am advocating that animals are very much so capable of rational thought. If you want to see a scary example, look up "smart crows" on youtube.

Would you agree that flying saucers are real? A lot of people have observed and have video of flying saucers.

Wow, my mind was blown. Thanks. But I am thinking that a squirt bottle would be cumbersome to carry to make it available at all times. Unless there is some small effective squirt bottle that I don't know about. Like something I can have in my pocket. Also the walking stick is interesting. You have inspired me to be creative though.

Oh? That is new information to me. Could you please explain how so many animal and insect species are nice to individuals of the same species? Lets take Sea Gulls. Why would they tolerate or be nice to each other, and even cooperate to get food and keep predators away from nests belonging to any sea gulls nearby? According to you, animals are incapable of morality, so how is this happening? In your view, can any other life form besides humans on this planet have these abilities? How do you know if they can or can not? The scientific explanation of an animal is, among other things, a multicellular eukaryotic organism that can move, and have an eventually fixed body plan, and must ingest other organisms to survive. Some can also undergo metamorphosis. Humans are scientifically considered belonging to this group of lifeforms. A lot of animal species forms societies of their own, ie birds, lions, seals, wolves, ants, elephants, dolphins, bees, which would suggest they have some kind of higher moral order. I am curious to know how humans have evolved beyond this general tendency.

Thank you very much. I am a native Norwegian. Here are the reasons I want to be able to defend myself: -Aggressive people are going into my country expecting luxury lives. Those who are declined asylum will very often just vanish before they can be deported, which means no one knows where they are. -Life threatening violence from a non native Norwegian against a native Norwegian was recorded on a cellphone and broadcast on youtube in a city close to me. (sentence corrected by ninja SJWs) -Pepper spray is illegal to have and import. -I walk outside at night around 3 times weekly.

I completely agree. Real medicine which has been studied for 200.000+ years is a safer bet. I'm not saying conspiracy. That is mostly a strawman. I understand the larger picture you want me to understand, which is an appeal to authority of a (vigorous) process. But this process is part of a system to make money. It is not a system to make people healthy. Only to show some desirable effect. The stuff that makes you healthy is non patentable, so no monopolized money involved. But also its worse than that, because several of the alternatives have been widely banned so that it can not be sold to people. I'd like to leave you to ponder who the actual snake oil salesmen are.

In Norway, whenever something alternative comes up in the media, the money hoarding cancer organizations are invited to tell everyone how ridiculous it is to believe in anything like that, and that its really mean to advice people who have cancer. And usually add that there is nothing that can cure cancer for good measure. Pretty much the same tactics they use on climate change and other propaganda.

I'm sure lots of organizations and government regulatory institutions do not recommend using calcium and gelatin for arthritis, or iodine / iodide for low metabolism (hypothyroidism). I had both of those conditions. Years ago. I was on an artificial hormone for low metabolism for 10 years. Definitely the crappiest 10 years of my life. Had really nothing going for me. Just downhill half zombie torment. My life could have been drastically different if I had just received enough information 10 years earlier about iodine and importance of vitamins and minerals then. Cancer organizations are very effective at attacking, ignoring, slandering, or just dismissing many things that can be used for cancer. But I already know around 5 effective non dangerous treatments, so they did not succeed in subjugating me, which means I will not have any problems with or die from cancer.

I've watched some karate centered self defense videos on youtube, and thought that it was effective advice, but now I came across this lady who says, and shows that they are useless. I will include at least one karate video below. What do you think? And do you have better advice or links? I just want to be able to defend myself adequately. Also important for the ladies in these times.