A4E

Absolutely awesome. Will be linking to it.

Great article. I saw that you switched roles for A and B in the conversation examples. That confused me.

Just watched the full version of the video in OP.

Growing up in Scandinavia, my government and TV told me that we might all look different on the outside, but on the inside we are all the same.

Does all kinds of work in return for money require a license there or what?

I have been mulling over this for a while. Lets say I make a book where I write: "Intolerah made the world. Everyone who do not accept and believe that Intolerah made the world needs to be killed." Then I declare my loyalty to this book. Can people be expected to get along with me if they did not declare their loyalty to this book and Intolerism? Can I live peacefully with other people when I am an intolerist? Could it have something to do with me pledging my loyalty to a death threat to people with a different opinion?

The biggest problem I can think of is that apps in the background already use, and also possibly reserve, portions of your computer's memory. When available memory gets low, it means everything will start going slower from shuffling the used memory to and from your virtual memory, which is likely your hard drive. A well designed computer friendly program will typically not do anything when idle, such as using the processing unit (CPU), unless really necessary. Though apps can do a lot of different things if programmed to do so, an app can not just wish away the resources it is hogging. You simply have to close the app to make that happen. If a developer says that their app does housekeeping, That is likely a big exaggeration, to make you think it is more advanced than it is, or a plea for your trust or something. Basically the same answer as Shirgall, but explained differently.

"People are so afraid and racist towards these people, that it is impossible for them to find a girlfriend, so I do not blame him." "We all need to make some sacrifices for the bigger cause. A loving and tolerating world." "It would be selfish of me to think that I can use my body only for myself."

Awesome point. Never thought about it like that. The science is settled that water freezes at around 0 degrees celsius, 32 degrees fahrenheit, and I do not know of any international water freezing research around. The science is settled that sunlight warms the planet, (though climate change panels might object to that), and I did not see any sunlight warming panels around. Lies need propagators to even survive. The truth can just be awakened whenever someone wants it.

While the father probably had a role in it, I suspect the main reason being toxic fluids injected, altering the brain.

Isn't wikipedia such a system? Despite its flaws, it is revered, and in demand by many.

The method in the article in OP contains a straw man. And it is perhaps the biggest and most used straw man regarding these topics. That everyone, including 3rd parties, that could be seen as having any involvement, would have to be in on a conspiracy. It presumes that there is a criminal conspiracy of which all these people are in the know about. Which is a straw man partially made out of fluffy cotton that is very easy to attack. (since only straws would be too strong for this straw man). I have read and heard that there is a divorce industry in the USA where those involved in the legal proceedings, are making a lot of money out of it, while a divorce can even be virtually free in other countries. So is the divorce industry in the USA a massive conspiracy where all of the involved people get together in a dark room and plan it all out? Likely not, but it is happening, and it is a means to an end. In this case money. But it could very well be other results in other topics. ie Apollo may have had an intended effect of distracting away from the Vietnam war. Co2 scare making people planet abusing sinners to be emotionally harvested for political gain and money. The idea of going to the moon, or trying to figure out if extra Co2 in the atmosphere was dangerous might not have started with these intentions, but they were probably led there along the way. If anyone is interested in a possible deep background for 9 11, you could look up username "conspiracy theorista" on youtube.

The Co2 scare industry, moon landing charade, and vaccine industry all have dissenters who were involved. So where does that leave this method? Did you know that cats get some perfectly safe non toxic vaccines that work? Probably because their owners did not want them to become brain damaged, chronically ill, or killed from toxic vaccines.

Wide angle counseling

Very interesting. I have not heard many good things about new york times. Can I trust this article to be based on facts?

I calculated with the same principle of this method that if the teachings of Islam is a hoax, it would be revealed from those involved in it, in 49 minutes, and 30 seconds. Formaldehyde, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, thimerosal (contains mercury), amonium sulfate, benzethonium chloride, among other ingredients, is something I choose not to have injected inside me or my children. Thanks for the entertaining article. Do you think it was ment to be satirical?

First thing to consider is how genuine the video is. My theory is that the 2 guys rushing in at 27 seconds had been instructed to do so. The rest of the reactions in the video might very well be real. Quite a number of youtubers are faking reactions to supposed pranks.

Lets say just for example that some person proves, explains, mathematically and physically show, and passes all tests and scientific methods, that everything is being pushed, not pulled. Not saying this can be done. It is just an example. And I certainly don't know how the universe works. Do you think you, or the world is ready to shelve the gravity pull theory and consider this new theory?

Another problem is theories which sole purpose is to defend other theories when they fail. The theory of gravity in its current established form does not explain how a galaxy rotates, or even how a galaxy is held together, because of the speeds on the outer arms. So instead of putting the old theory on the shelf, the dark matter theory was created to defend it. Now all the additional dark matter will keep the galaxies together. But this created another problem, because observations apparently told us that the universe is expanding. How can that be if there is so much pull on everything from dark matter? Dark energy comes to the rescue! Now both dark matter and dark energy tries to explain everything on top of the theory of gravity. We have no real evidence of either of these, they are literally just made up assumptions based on the theory of gravity. I suspect it has something to do with everyone wanting to clam onto the established theory of gravity, because admitting that it may be false is too much to bare. The following quote from a site is a good example of this: "Let me begin by telling you that dark matter is real. The evidence is overwhelming. Without dark matter stars would escape their galaxies and galaxy clusters would come unbound."

Awesome! If you want some criticism, I found the parts about murder, stealing, and raping being 'unwanted' a bit confusing, because it was fast paced and you did not adequately explain the relevance imo. Even if I now understand what you wanted to convey. Those parts might throw off some people. But maybe thats just me...

We have a good idea of who is the most important person for a peaceful voluntary planet.

To reach a conclusion that a person has 130 in IQ, you would have to test the person with an IQ test. IQ tests include math as far as I know. So the question is a bit self imploding. All people are able to learn anything as long as the motivation is there, like social pressure, personal goal, or survival.

If this is true, I am not surprised. I have watched some Swedish political debates on internet, and it is some of the most childish stuff I have ever seen. Actually, that is unfair to children. Children are more mature than what goes on in those debates. I observed that the conservative side sometimes try to steer the conversation into something useful, but then they are dragged into the mud by the left again. Example: "...The other party was involved in something bad in our country 75 years ago. It is important to point out this fact when they now speak about this issue." "...But their party contributed to something even worse in our country 100 years ago, so I think we can all agree on who is not to be relied upon."

-Contributing extra Co2 to the atmosphere is a sin. -Sinners are rebellious and sexy. -People want to be rebellious and sexy. -People will gladly pay to be rebellious and sexy. Its kinda like a gym membership for people who frequently drive a car and don't want to work out. I think this religion is here to stay for the foreseeable future.