Tweak

Well I have to say that I understand your dilemma and even tough a post I made some time ago doesnt answer your question I wish that you read it for your own sake and maybe you have some help in the manner. https://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/43842-the-rational-behind-having-children-and-pets/#entry400480

Well, you ask why not? Might I start by stating some reasons FOR nationalism to start with. I think my message will become more clear if I state some reasons in support for nationalism to shed some light on the issues at hand. Explanations and pros regarding Nationalism: Nations as we have today are the results of western- european heads of, well, regions coming to terms over new regions. Nation states. Some say it was a treaty but it was actually a prolonged talks with over 200 delegates. Anyway it was a way to balance power since Europe had witnessed so much war. National interest, foreign policy etc.. The west I have to say have had some to do with how the rest of the world operates. On a nation state basis. "In the before times" kings, emperors, well rulers have operated on a "im one with God, the center of the universe" ond so on. Actually, France was perhaps one of the countries perfecting statecraftship to more or less what we have today. Actually it was more or less one man obviously a stratigigist who started the process and was a man of the church. The reason I personally find nationalism to be a beacon of light is because it creates a balance of power. Over the times, many wars have been fought coz of different people have been subjected to believes, laws and many other things that does not go hand and hand with their culture. The same problem exists today in states themselves tough it is not to the same extent. Just look at the people here in europe and the opposition to the EU. Not only does it create a balance of power but it creates a shorter hand if you will. What I mean by that is the fact that it is easier to make a change. However in my personal research I have found that nation states- (many are now just nations) are more or less governed by the same kind of people and in fact the very same people. Witch is not odd in my personal view. Who has the most in common? A billionaire in the UK and a farmer in the UK or a billionaire in the UK and the US? I think any rational person would know the answer to that question. Okay so now to the downside of nationalism: No matter how noble you might find for example Donald Trump he is in fact just like everybody else. What do I mean by that? He is the man who is trying to have other people subservient to him. To become the commander inb chief. Commanding you. The problem with this is that he is representing an area ei. the USA. In the US there are over 300 million people. Not everyone voted for him. The truth is that only the majority decides your destiny. So if 51 % thinks that you shouldnt eat potatoes you can no longer do that... () The cold hard truth of the matter is that if everybody had the "american spirit" they would not need a commander. Nor the laws to enforce the "values" of the american people. If everybody under this region (the US) had the same attitudes and so on there would be no reason for laws or a commander. Also when it comes to leaders and their parties they have a very dangerous element witch is the element of ambiguity. When ever you have ambiguity like for example Donald Trump states that he wants to make america great again. Ambiguity is something all leaders and their parties have and this makes a lot of room for radicalism. It is almost a kind of must. Coz if you as a leader lay out exactly what you want to do, not as many people would follow. When you have ambiguity as a leader you can rely on you charms and let the people in question fill in the gaps in order to feel like they belong to something (you the leader).

You are looking through the lens of totalitarianism. In a free society (anarcho- capitalism) the woman could choose to have an insurance if you will, towards bad judgement for her not choosing the right man to provide for her. You are not deep. You are a regurgitation of all media input when it comes to family, gender and so on. The choice is up to the women. It has nothing of convincing to do. When it comes to the increase in wealth for couples when they both work... Well the only reason you would feel the need, financially, for both of you and your wife to work is coz the banking industry together with the mighty state have made the situation in witch you and your hypothetical family live in. In an anarcho- capitalist society I can easily see you, wife and child living together in a house with white pigged fence.

It seems like I do not understand your post. Would you please elaborate so that I can fully understand the post and give a proper answer.

I have a theory. The basis of my theory goes in hand with the fact that most anarcho- capitalists come from a (term used broadly) right wing basis. When it comes to politics, right wingers are the ones most keen to underscore the problematics of immigration.

I moved to London 1.5 weeks ago and ive only met one brit so far...

How can blaming an entire race for something be in the "right direction"? All they do in that show is to try to be the underdog. I dont care if all other white people did something bad yesterday. I will not tolerate being blamed for anything other people may or may not have done. All this creates is an underachieving culture with whiney people, competing on future entitlements from the government. Because that is all you will be able to do in the future when you spend you time like this.

How do I know? Well as I told you in the previous post I have studied them for 3-4 years. If I´m lumping them all together? Well yes I do. On speculation? Both yes and no. Some things I can only speculate in. However my answer to you is solely based on facts. Different organisation that use the name freemason? Well you have different lodges. They can differ in some ways depending on the country. But freemasons are freemasons. I assume you are an anarchist and an anarchist who wants to join a lodge is almost as funny as an anarchist joining the church. It always does. I have not had any discussion online in some years. It never goes anywhere. The topic is enormous. Simply put it you have 2 groups of people when it comes to this. Those who will arrive at the conclusion that the masons are responsible for the everything, much like a God is to religious people and then those who say that it´s just people getting together. Both groups are wrong. And this was my last post in this topic! Over and out:)

I have spent the last 3-4 years studying secrete societies and I live right across of a lodge used by multiple societies. When I was a taxi driver I used to drive them to and from their gatherings. Would you be a part of a church because of their moral values? Just like the church the masons values are based in pretty muddied waters. To be honest with you, if you seek to better yourself to become a moral person I suggest you do that elsewhere. Those people are far from moral.

Hello! Just finished som last tweaks on my new non-profit website. It is going to be updated with new material from time to time. It is meant for you guys to study the workings of government leading you to be better able to protect yourself. The website is: www.subversiveactivities.net I hope that some will find it useful.

I know that there is a lot of talk about the "rights" (rights where are you!XD) in regard to the gays getting married. I don´t understand why on earth the gays work so hard with big daddy the state into making them be part of it. If I were gay I would´nt want to join a club witch expresses that it does not want to have anything to do with me. Secondly It is a damn shame to elevate the power of the state like this. I think 1MFi is wrong that this somehow shows that the government is reducing it´s control because once again it has shown us that it needs to be the one making the decisions. Besides it has been a tremendous amounts of different little brothers of the state such as NGO: s and think tanks supported with private donations AND our tax dollars, working in tandem with the state do make this happen. Far from all people in the US wished for this to happen and ignored their wishes. The state once again shows a lack of respect for the individual. Oppression of the few to make room for the state is getting old. Remember the state granted this "right" this unfortunately only shows us how little power we have. If the state disappears in my lifetime you gays can be part of my club, everyone is welcome except for statists!

Misspost

If you found this interesting I suggest you read a book called "Magnificent mind at any age". http://www.amazon.com/Magnificent-Mind-Any-Age-Potential/dp/0307339106/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1431373463&sr=8-1&keywords=beautiful+mind+at+any+age

The only way for the UK to leave the EU will be if they put in place a "shadow EU" where the elite can continue to prosper. Every time a party in Europe gains momentum they become less and less critical of the monster EU. Most of the things will not change its more like: "Would you like me to wear a blue or red T- shirt while I spank you" thing...

Did not mean to post...

Well since you are a part of this "community" I find that the people in general here try to be moral. You also wrote a very long post where I concluded that you needed third- party validation. Your problem is something that I dont know, but think is actually not a big deal and if its not a big deal this means that you are insecure. (At least thats my train of thought). Your problem X is something I believe to be something thats "not normal- but actually is normal".

I think that there are good women in the UK.

Its depressing that pavlovian dogs runs this world...

Well my advice is to go to therapy. I think that you should try your very best to tell the therapist whats nagging you. I was lucky be cause I hade a therapist who was a man and very soft spoken but still manly, otherwise I would feel very uncomfortable. "Do you have experience engaging deep problems in a relationship. How did it go?" It did not go well, to say the least... And I dont have any advice in this particular matter since I myself is a highly dysfunctional person. I mean I wouldn't want to count on other people to solve these kinds of deep problems for me.- Why not? The next time they need help you will be there for them!

What does he do for a job? Could he afford going abroad for a moth? Maybe there are foreign women? Or maybe use a datingsite witch pairs you with others?

No I dont think you have a victim mentality. Have you gone to therapy? This thing that had burden you, did you ever share this with anyone? I have a very amateurish theory: You have this problem, lets call it X. The X problem is your burden than nobody but yourself knows about. Since you are an insecure person (thats the feeling I get) you have no idea how other people would react if they new what your X problem was. Would they understand? Would they hate me? What are the chances they think im just like everybody else? The core of the problem, I believe is that you have this X problem and theres nobody there to tell you are a good person or not. You are so insecure with your feelings that you need a third party that tell you "ITS OKEY, YOU CAN MOVE ON AND BE HAPPY"- witch you dont have since you are afraid of what that person would think of you? Im I right or wrong?

$19/hr ? Do you have any rich family members where you can find a job? $19/hr.... I think you will have to lower your expectations regarding payment.

So in other words now she is designing things thats also is being used to control people

Our own intelligence services has done the exact same thing with their own people for a long time. Ive already made this post before but il copy and paste it here if its of interest: It is my personal belief that if I am to tell somebody they are stupid, well then I want to be educated about it. It is not a must, however one will feel more liberated and able to "fight" agains tyrants such as in this thread commies. I have therefore studied it in some detail. So I´m going to make a short "what is communism" since I´ve seen some both faulty and good explanations. Like every system of ideological governance witch we have hade al the time it seems like. Requires that all principles must be laid on every person of that society and thus those who disagree must suffer. It doesn´t matter witch ideology it is, this is what will happen. To be very clear, people who have "money" meaning the super rich, are in fact communists. What do I mean by that? Well I mean that money is not enough for them, they want to control the people too. And that they do by the control of production. Just like commies. The control of production is key since the production of for example food keeps people "in line". Communism vs socialism. Whats is the difference with socialism and communism? It is the means by witch one thinks that socialism should be achieved. That one is that a communist thinks that he should force socialism on others, and socialists should vote their way to socialism. The anarcho- communist, to me seem like communism. What do I mean by that? Well one must understand that the endgame of communism, once fully implemented is that of a stateless society, that is called Full Communism- their claimed goal. Therefore I feel that anarcho- communism is faulty be cause what it is suggesting is a stateless society. Just like the NLRBE:s believe that things are going to show up out of nowhere and that society is going to supply them with an abundance of produce. No government needed. No money needed. So how come the most totalitarian regimes have been communist based? Well for starters communist core in furthering the agenda of communism comes to one end, and that is that anything goes as so long it further the socialist ideology. If the end is to have a stateless society how come they have dictators staying in power till they die? One reason ore excuse they have for this is that society needs to be reinforced until people are "good enough" to not have to be told what to do. This leading like in the case of Joseph Stalin to a nationalist state, witch in and of it self is contradictory, since a socialist is a person does´nt believe in a state, but that rather "all workers should gather together no matter witch state, sex and race you are. We are all victims of the capitalist." Already in the 1920:s the commies new that what they proposed did´nt work. Be cause of this they new they hade to come up with a new plan to implement their world- wide revolution. Before we continue a need to stress that what you are about to read is not necessarily communist subversion but subversion of the totalitariasts to " the common folk". This is what the sovjets did to us in the west and the rest of the word and is started not long after the October revolution. NOTE our leaders of the "free world" did the same thing most people forget this even tough there are evidence. This leading to some extent of my personal opinion that some checkas and then KGB to think that they were more successful than they were be cause the very people who they did this to, their own leader did to their own people at the same time. Thus helping each other furthering the agenda of a totalitarian regime. The regime change is going to be done by the same method of subversion. They are called today, 1:st 2:nd and 3:rd way feminists and then you have the liberals and the multiculturalists. In essence it is the same type of people trying to usher in a new world, by subversion. Most of them do not know this because they are stupid and shallow people. Once this things are implemented the kings of society can put forth the "Iron Curtain". Since society has collapsed and the masses are now screaming of a savior. This is the time when Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin shows up. This can of course happen any time now since the people, at least from the western countries since the people, almost all are subverted. The NLRB: ist will have the same explanation to the worlds trouble as Karl Marx did. Marx said that industrialization was the answer to abundance. None of them seem to realize that just because something is scarce, doesn´nt mean that there will be a shortage. And that it will save the earth from extinsion. Wich is counter to what they both state, since they say that they want abundance. The free market will take care of that since the free market will put the resources in the most exact manner to the places it needs to go. People already buy shit they don´t need to impress people they don´t like....

On a dating website I think that may be the case. However in real life you can communicate your message differently. Being funny is something women like and its hard to be funny at a dating site. Ive spent at least 1 year at different dating sites and I have never gotten a reply or something like that. Not once. Im not bad looking nor good looking maybe a 6.5 or 7. However in real life the girls Ive had were 8:s, 9:s and 10:s. I can only assume that this was be cause of something other than my looks.