Tweak

I use GoDaddy as host. Buy your domain at NameCheap.com. Works fine.

Well if its finite or not matters. You need to be able to reach whatever resources you want to get your hands on. If something exists in the ground and you dont have the means to get all the way down you will have to see it as finite resource since you cant get it anyway. "This implies that instead of fearing a tougher future, we should think about how to build a better future from the near limitless possibilities."- These are just words with no substance. Just because something is finite doesn't mean that there will be a shortage. Thus one could reach a better future when it comes to material needs. We don´t need to fear anything when ut comes to resources as long as we can achieve a free market where the allocation of resources with alternative uses is free to flow where it is needed, this will also give the momentum needed to go to space as you talked about with knowledge, the materials and machines needed to find these next resources- the free market will create an incentive to do just that.

Well this sums it up why being a anarchist is the way to go!

I too am from Sweden and I once had a, not a shrink and not a shrink who can write prescription medication but the one who is "under" them and at one time I described a feeling and she said it wasnt valid be cause it was against the UN:s human rights.

I moste Well in my country "they" are lobbying quite hard for regulation. All this because someone might call you a fag online. The leftist media is heavily involved with this and has gained a lot of support by the trendies. They want you to have kind of a "real" internet name so that when you call someone a fag they can get prosecuted. Even now the biggest newspapers uses former trainers of terrorists (literally) to find the "dissidents" online who then break out information from peoples private accounts and gives it to the media who then go to the dissidents home with a camera crew. Their lives will be destroyed (threats, loss of jobs and so on). Theres even a popular show called "Trolljägarna" headed by a popular leftist who goes around finding these "horrible enemies." They even hold "workshops" organized by leftists who teach them how to extract information from say a post like this one to find out who I am, how old I am, to my home location so that I could be found. Mmmm socialism. I put all important informations separate drives...

"Is it immoral to drive your car - because someone might possibly fall into the road infront of you?" No I cant see how that could be immoral. Is it moral to facilitate conditions on the road that greatly endangers people?

Well I mean, they do give us some good laughs

To be honest with you I have not looked at this groups background and who the people are. My interpretation is that this is one of several anti human groups. Most of witch are backed by internationalists (the bad kind). They have again and again publicly stated their desire to depopulate the earth. They see "us" as cattle and that they do not need as many as we are to work for them once the "iron curtain" has fully come down. They want to depopulate the earth of people, remember that- people, not gods- as they see themselves. They very well know that the highest form of warfare is to not fight at all. They start groups of useful idiots to do the work for them. "They" themselves plan to stay. The very fact that this person, the one in the first video, goes on and on about animals is just crazy. Pandas come on, they are, black, white and asian and communists- the very wet dream of a leftist. No but seriously. Would the world really be better for the animals if we were gone? We do a lot of good things for animals as humans. A lot of bad things too- but I think we are more likely in the long term to provide better living conditions for animals than themselves for the very fact that animals are stupid. Animals themselves are killers. By the way, when some animals enter a new area it is common for one species to die out or relocate...

" If we continue down this totalitarian path to a socialist paradise, we may eventually see legally forced reproduction." No socialists would be the last ones to do that in the future. Socialists have for a long time tried to reduce the amount of humans.

Tank you. So basically you see the word like I do. Sorry you hade to suffer like this.

Its a great book. Ive read it. This system is still creating life tough. I agree.

"The idea that you'd align your actions with the preferences of something which doesn't exist is nonsensical. " You have a valid point. However as humans we know for example that if I push the break all the way down in my car on a freeway we know what could happen. I could get hit by the car behind me or there could be no car and nothing would happen. This situation doesn´t exist yet, am I then nonsensical because i see the possible outcome?

Ive read "Brave New World" too. You should check out his history. He is one of the shapers of the word that we live in today, he has been very busy. By the way its still the creation of lives... You have given me a lot to think about. Thank you for you answer I very much appreciate it.

I would say that I would prefer to see new people coming to life for next generations to go beyond the stars.

Now we are taking about what what I would prefer and has nothing to do with the question at hand.

As I stated before in my first post this is something I very well understand, that by my reasoning the human race would cease to exist. However the question is directed to see if my reasoning is flawed from a moral standpoint. Since a wanted child is yet to exist it can not be hurt nor feel joy for the very simple reason that it does not exist. Thus bringing one in to the world, create life if you will, ultimately leads to the possibility of hurt.

Yes. I completely understand what you are saying. I have had some (1 or 2) people who asked to kill them because of pain, they themselves being unable to. As to " As far as I can tell, most children who are not severely neglected or abused are pretty happy to be alive." My mom is a what we call "day- mother" I have yet to see a child who is to be acknowledged as a person who is not being neglected by their parents.

Thats the point tough, you know that there is a chans of "bad luck". Having had a lot of different jobs one including driving around sick, old and mentally ill people this "bad luck" is quite horrendous. The 1 % was merely an example of that it doesn't matter how little the chans of bad luck there is, as long as it exists.

If you look at the nonverbal behavior of women they do signal submission and helplessness when trying to get attention from males also with the help of makeup. When women are angulating they show even more desire for deep manly voices and otherwise male behavior. It is my own theory that by the male being the dominant one in bed you are showing the woman that you are able to protect here. With the reasoning being that if you cant control her, how would you be able to control male enemies. Since a man the same size as a women is twice as strong. My personal experience that I enjoy being the dominant one. If i were to be submissive in bed that would leave me to feel emasculated. For example one girlfriend I had asked me why I never slappt her as anymore, you know during the day, not during sex (I still did that). In hindsight I suspect I stopped doing this because I now had her and I felt like I no longer had to prove myself as being the dominant one. However this she noticed and asked me why I stopped as if it was like I no longer loved her. Maybe TS is just a feminized pushover or so comfortable in his manliness that he doesnt need to show dominant signals. Witch one it is I dont know. If he is, you are someone who does not need to be the dominant one in bed, well enjoy it.

Hello fellow anarchists! I was hoping that someone could help me shed some light on why moral people would have children or pets. I was thinking that I would describe my thought process, so here we go: If you bring a child to this world or pay someone to have it for you it is not the awaited childs wish. It is merely your own wish since the child is yet to exist. I can see to reasons why bringing a child to this world would happen: 1 You have by bad judgement had unprotected sex with a women- she is now pregnant. 2 You have a woman who you love and wish to have a child. However one does not have children to become unhappy, as long as it is not forced upon you by various means, that to me look like you want a child so that you could get happy. So by my reasoning having children is a most selfish and sick act. Why do I say that? Lets say that you chances of bringing a new child to this world who will live a very happy life, no sickness, no wars, always mentally stable and good personal economy with a lovely woman or man are 99 % sure. For 99 % of new lives this will be the course of their lives. Now to the 1 %. This 1 % will be mentally ill, get cancer, used by women and in the end getting killed of a piano falling over him. Knowing that this 1 % by empirical evidence is heavily underestimated, how could you do it? How could you even as a moral person contemplate doing this to another person or animal? Adopting however is a to my a completely different matter. If you adopt a child who otherwise is destined to grow up to become a hustler or whore, this to me would be a moral action. The same if a cat comes to you doorstep asking for food and you end up taking care of it. Both the cat and the child would probably be better of. Instead of the cat dying of hunger you feed it and instead of the child becoming a hustler or a whore the child will have an education and loving parents maybe a boy or girlfriend. One could argue that one could off one self once you are unhappy but you wouldn't have to do this most sad thing if you were not born. If you off yourself your parents would become most sad and unhappy thus again proving that a child is like a toy for parents got to make themselves happy. This proving their selfishness. Morality is a choice. I know that if all people would be reasoning like I do humanity would cease to exist. So this is merely a pure moral question. So is my reasoning flawed?

This study is silly. Ignorance is bliss, socialism breeds ignorance thus the people are happy. Sweden is the rape capitol of Europe, we have many happy rapists since in essence we pay them to rape (welfare), again, happy people...

It is my personal belief that if I am to tell somebody they are stupid, well then I want to be educated about it. It is not a must, however one will feel more liberated and able to "fight" agains tyrants such as in this thread commies. I have therefore studied it in some detail. So I´m going to make a short "what is communism" since I´ve seen some both faulty and good explanations. Like every system of ideological governance witch we have hade al the time it seems like. Requires that all principles must be laid on every person of that society and thus those who disagree must suffer. It doesn´t matter witch ideology it is, this is what will happen. To be very clear, people who have "money" meaning the super rich, are in fact communists. What do I mean by that? Well I mean that money is not enough for them, they want to control the people too. And that they do by the control of production. Just like commies. The control of production is key since the production of for example food keeps people "in line". Communism vs socialism. Whats is the difference with socialism and communism? It is the means by witch one thinks that socialism should be achieved. That one is that a communist thinks that he should force socialism on others, and socialists should vote their way to socialism. The anarcho- communist, to me seem like communism. What do I mean by that? Well one must understand that the endgame of communism, once fully implemented is that of a stateless society, that is called Full Communism- their claimed goal. Therefore I feel that anarcho- communism is faulty be cause what it is suggesting is a stateless society. Just like the NLRBE:s believe that things are going to show up out of nowhere and that society is going to supply them with an abundance of produce. No government needed. No money needed. So how come the most totalitarian regimes have been communist based? Well for starters communist core in furthering the agenda of communism comes to one end, and that is that anything goes as so long it further the socialist ideology. If the end is to have a stateless society how come they have dictators staying in power till they die? One reason ore excuse they have for this is that society needs to be reinforced until people are "good enough" to not have to be told what to do. This leading like in the case of Joseph Stalin to a nationalist state, witch in and of it self is contradictory, since a socialist is a person does´nt believe in a state, but that rather "all workers should gather together no matter witch state, sex and race you are. We are all victims of the capitalist." Already in the 1920:s the commies new that what they proposed did´nt work. Be cause of this they new they hade to come up with a new plan to implement their world- wide revolution. Before we continue a need to stress that what you are about to read is not necessarily communist subversion but subversion of the totalitariasts to " the common folk". This is what the sovjets did to us in the west and the rest of the word and is started not long after the October revolution. NOTE our leaders of the "free world" did the same thing most people forget this even tough there are evidence. This leading to some extent of my personal opinion that some checkas and then KGB to think that they were more successful than they were be cause the very people who they did this to, their own leader did to their own people at the same time. Thus helping each other furthering the agenda of a totalitarian regime. The regime change is going to be done by the same method of subversion. They are called today, 1:st 2:nd and 3:rd way feminists and then you have the liberals and the multiculturalists. In essence it is the same type of people trying to usher in a new world, by subversion. Most of them do not know this because they are stupid and shallow people. Once this things are implemented the kings of society can put forth the "Iron Curtain". Since society has collapsed and the masses are now screaming of a savior. This is the time when Benito Mussolini, Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin shows up. This can of course happen any time now since the people, at least from the western countries since the people, almost all are subverted. The NLRB: ist will have the same explanation to the worlds trouble as Karl Marx did. Marx said that industrialization was the answer to abundance. None of them seem to realize that just because something is scarce, doesn´nt mean that there will be a shortage. And that it will save the earth from extinsion. Wich is counter to what they both state, since they say that they want abundance. The free market will take care of that since the free market will put the resources in the most exact manner to the places it needs to go. People already buy shit they don´t need to impress people they don´t like....

One thing that I think you need to consider is the fact that she comes from a dirt poor country. And since the other guy as you said was " emotionlessness and passivity of her current boyfriend" might not be the one offering a ring and a stay in the country... You also said that she has been the dominant one in her previous relationships and on top of that offered to go to her place to cook. Some women from poorer countries are very good at letting one hear what one wants. These things, I have to say screams greencard. You seem like a very good guy so please don´t be a NoNuts kind of guy thats being taken advantaged of. I don´t know what she is like except from what you wrote so I hope that I just shined a possibility at you and in no way saying that "this is the way it is".

I suggest people take a good look at the companies funding these campaigns. It always goes back to the mega corporations and the banks plus the somewhat recognizable companies who are afraid that the "party" will kick them to the curb and then joins these life hating subverters too. So many times these "liberty movements" are just the product of the state, corporations and banks who almost always consist of a decadent menages a trois . Witch stupidly leftist think are enemies of each other. TS, how about we get rid of the biggest killer of them all witch is the state and this way biting the head of the snake? Here you have some figures: http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NOTE1.HTM

Well, the core of feminism says that there is a world wide conspiracy we men have against women and cheat you of your success, ofter referring to a carrier, calling it emancipation. I personally have never seen how being stuck at work would be liberating. And to your question as to wether women have been disadvantaged in history I personally would say no, at least for what I have seen. The thing is that if you look at history and then want to blame either sex for advantages or disadvantages I would have to say that "it´s the women folks fault". Why? Because thru out history women have made a conscious choice to choose the man that offers her the most resources and the most protection. Thus forcing men to compete with each other. And to this day cause serious violence and sometimes even death. If the man can not meet any of these criteria he will not get to have sex, at least not with the women's consent and he will have no offspring to carry his gens. This then proving that the people here today are the choice of women, by large. Sadly it happens to often that people on this planet are not here becouse of the womans choice. You also said that you sometimes feel like a piece of shit. Well sadly the feminist movement was never about helping women as some may believe and then "went to far". It was always about getting more people to pay taxes and to have kidz grow up with the state as their mom and dad. But most certainly you should not feel bad, most women never come to the conclusion you have. Since you are part of most radical feminist movement in history and resisting their brainwashing just shows that you have brain and integrity. It´s not an easy thing to escape this omnipresent doctrine. Sadly with this feminist world you will have a hard time finding a real man who knows what a hammer is. Most likely he will just know how to smoke pot and play video games all day. Witch can of course be fun, but come on doing that all the time... And when it comes to women there are at least not to many women who does not come from "Sluts R´us" and knows what a frying pan is... At least not where i live.